Employment Tribunal Case Withdrawal

Summary

When an Employment Tribunal (ET) case is settled in the UK, the claimant generally withdraws the claim. Withdrawal involves notifying the tribunal that the claim will not be pursued further. Strike outs are less common post-settlement and usually occur due to procedural dismissals. A claimant can request to strike out their claim for reasons such as non-compliance with tribunal orders, lack of reasonable prospects, or if the claim is scandalous or vexatious. If the respondents response contains false denials, present evidence to the tribunal to highlight inconsistencies. A strike out can expedite resolution, but waiting for a hearing may yield a more favorable outcome.

Full Conversation

When an ET case has been settled what does the claimant do - withdraw it strike out?
When an Employment Tribunal (ET) case is settled, the claimant typically withdraws the claim. Here’s a brief overview:
- Withdrawal: The claimant informs the tribunal that they no longer wish to pursue the claim.
- Strike Out: This happens when the tribunal dismisses the case due to procedural issues, not typically after a settlement.
Where are you located? This can help provide more specific guidance.
Uk
Once an Employment Tribunal (ET) case is settled in the UK, the claimant generally withdraws the claim. Here are the steps:
- Withdraw: Notify the tribunal that you no longer wish to pursue the claim.
- Strike Out: This is not common post-settlement and usually pertains to procedural dismissals.
Do you need help with the withdrawal process or have other questions about your ET case?
What reasons can a claimant strike out?
In the UK, a claimant can request to strike out their claim for several reasons:
- Non-compliance with tribunal orders or rules.
- The claim has no reasonable prospects of success.
- The claim is scandalous, vexatious, or has no reasonable grounds.
- The claim or response is an abuse of the tribunal's process.
Would you like more details on any of these reasons?
What would make the respondents response scandalous or vexatious?
A respondent's response in an Employment Tribunal (ET) case can be considered scandalous or vexatious if it meets the following criteria:
- Scandalous: The response contains offensive, irrelevant, or abusive language.
- Vexatious: The response is intended to annoy, harass, or cause unnecessary delay.
Do you need further clarification on any of these points?
What if it’s just denials that you know are not true?
If the respondent's denials are demonstrably false, you can bring this to the tribunal's attention.
- Present evidence that contradicts the respondent's statements.
- Highlight inconsistencies in their response.
- Request the tribunal to consider these points when making a decision.
Would you like advice on how to gather and present this evidence?
Yes
To effectively gather and present evidence:
- Collect Documentation: Emails, contracts, and any written communication relevant to the case.
- Witness Statements: Obtain statements from individuals who can support your claims.
- Organize Evidence: Make sure all evidence is clearly labeled and organized.
- Present Clearly: Highlight key points and inconsistencies in the respondent's statements.
Would you like more specific tips on presenting your evidence in the tribunal?
Why strike out and not wait for the hearing?
A strike out could be considered if the respondent's response is scandalous, vexatious, or has no reasonable grounds, as it could expedite the resolution without the need for a full hearing. However, waiting for a hearing allows you to present all evidence and potentially achieve a more favorable outcome.
Would you like more detailed advice on whether to pursue a strike out or proceed to a hearing?