Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence

It seems you're interested in understanding the implications of Section 65B in the context of disciplinary proceedings, particularly with reference to a Supreme Court judgment.
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act pertains to the admissibility of electronic records. Key points include:
- Electronic records must be accompanied by a certificate as per Section 65B(*) for admissibility.
- The certificate must detail the manner of production, the device involved, and the integrity of the data.
To give you more precise information, could you please specify the nature of the disciplinary proceedings you're concerned about?

Impersonation in disciplinary proceedings can be a serious issue. Here are some relevant points regarding the admissibility of electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act:
- Electronic records must be accompanied by a certificate for admissibility.
- The certificate should detail the production manner and the device used.
- The Supreme Court has upheld the necessity of such a certificate for electronic evidence.
Could you specify whether the impersonation involved falsified electronic records or other digital impersonation methods?

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the admissibility of electronic records, and the Supreme Court judgment emphasizes the necessity of a certificate for such evidence.
Could you please provide more details about the nature of the electronic records involved in the impersonation case? This will help in understanding how the judgment impacts your situation.

For better guidance, could you specify the type of electronic records involved (emails, digital documents, etc.) and how they were allegedly used for impersonation? This will help tailor the information to your situation.