Business Records Hearsay Exception

Summary

The business records exception allows certain records to be admissible in court if made in the regular course of business, at or near the time of the event, and by someone with knowledge of the event. Key authorities include Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 803(6), and cases like United States v. Vigneau and Palmer v. Hoffman. In England & Wales, the Civil Evidence Act 1995 and Criminal Justice Act 2003, Section 117, along with cases like R v. Patel, provide guidance on this exception.

Full Conversation

Can you cite relevant authorities on this exception?
Certainly, Sophie! Here are some key authorities regarding the business records exception under the hearsay rule:
- Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule *(*)
- Case: United States v. Vigneau, * F.3d * (1st Cir. *)
- Case: Palmer v. Hoffman, * U.S. * (*)
These provide foundational understanding and precedents for the exception. If you want more detailed analysis or case studies, let me know!
Can you cite authorities that are from England & Wales jurisdiction?
Certainly! Here are some key authorities regarding the business records exception under the hearsay rule from the England & Wales jurisdiction:
- Civil Evidence Act *: This Act provides the framework for admissibility of hearsay evidence in civil proceedings.
- Criminal Justice Act *, Section *: This section deals with the admissibility of business documents in criminal proceedings.
- Case: R v. Patel [*] EWCA Crim *: This case discusses the application of hearsay exceptions in criminal trials.
Let me know if you need more information!