Understanding Fiji Evidence Law

Summary

A hostile witness in Fijis law is one who shows hostility or unwillingness to tell the truth, allowing the calling party to cross-examine them. Hearsay evidence refers to out-of-court statements used to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally inadmissible unless exceptions apply. Cross-examination involves questioning a witness by the opposing party to challenge their testimony or credibility. Understanding these terms is crucial for navigating legal proceedings in Fiji.

Full Conversation

What is the term of hostile witness in fiji law of evidence
In the Fiji law of evidence, a "hostile witness" is defined as a witness who demonstrates hostility or unwillingness to tell the truth while giving evidence. The court may grant permission to the party who called the witness to cross-examine them as if they were called by the opposing side.
Is there a specific situation or case you are dealing with involving a hostile witness?
The term of hearsay evidence in fiji law of evidence
Hearsay evidence in the Fiji Law of Evidence refers to statements made outside of court that are presented to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Generally, hearsay is inadmissible unless it falls under one of several exceptions.
Is there a specific situation or case involving hearsay evidence that you need help with?
Is there a specific situation or case you are dealing with involving a hostile witness?
It seems like you're seeking definitions and explanations related to legal terms under Fiji's Law of Evidence. Here are the key points:
- Hostile Witness: Defined as a witness showing hostility or unwillingness to tell the truth, allowing cross-examination by the calling party.
- Hearsay Evidence: Statements made outside court to prove truth, generally inadmissible unless exceptions apply.
Is there a specific legal case or situation you need assistance with?
The term of cross examination
Cross-examination in the context of the Fiji Law of Evidence involves the questioning of a witness by the opposing party to challenge their testimony or credibility.
Is there a specific legal case or situation you are dealing with that involves cross-examination?