Finding Missing Son Abroad

Summary

Parents concerned about their sons whereabouts in Scotland should contact local authorities, consult a family lawyer, and seek consulate assistance. GDPR restricts information sharing. Relevant Indian case laws include K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) on privacy rights and D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) on detainee rights.

Full Conversation

A son of a couple shifted to Scotland from india to study and then sent a message that he wants to cut his parents off from his life and not keep in touch and even stopped accepting money from his parents, his parents are worried about whereabouts of his son and went to Scotland and his college and understood he is in the same city but when enquired in the college, it was informed to them due to gdpr rules they cant let them know the details of this son,so the parents are worried about their son, id they want to meet, what is the procedure like habeus corpus or any other writ governing access to a person fro another country against the college, questioning the college, give me case laws * in number in relation to in support of the parents and help them find their son

This is a complex and emotionally challenging situation. Here are some steps and legal concepts that might be helpful:

Steps for Parents:
*. Contact Local Authorities in Scotland: Report the situation to the local police in Scotland. They can conduct a welfare check on the son.
*. Legal Counsel in Scotland: Consult a lawyer in Scotland specializing in family law and GDPR regulations.
*. Consulate Assistance: Reach out to the Indian Consulate in Scotland for guidance and support.

Legal Concepts:
- GDPR: General Data Protection Regulation, which restricts the sharing of personal information without consent.
- Habeas Corpus: A legal action to seek relief from unlawful detention. Applicability may vary.
- Writ of Mandamus: To compel a public authority to perform a duty.

Relevant Case Laws:
Here are some Indian case laws related to habeas corpus and family rights. Note that these may not be directly applicable to the situation in Scotland but can provide a general understanding:
*. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (*)
*. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*)
*. Sheela Barse

more relevant case laws in support of parents the son is not a minor

Given the context and concerns, here are some more relevant case laws and legal concepts within Indian jurisdiction that might help support the parents' case. Note that these may provide a general understanding but may not be directly applicable in Scotland:

Relevant Case Laws:
*. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (*):
- Right to Privacy as a fundamental right.
*. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*):
- Guidelines on arrest and detention to prevent custodial abuse.
*. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (*):
- Guidelines on the treatment of prisoners and detainees.
*. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (*):
- Fundamental rights and personal liberty.
*. Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (*):
- Right to be informed of grounds of arrest.
*. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (*):
- Rights of prisoners and detainees.
*. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (*):
- Speedy trial and human rights in detention.
*

i need case laws with * words of explanation

Here are some relevant case laws with brief explanations:
*. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (*): Established the right to privacy as a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution.
*. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*): Provided guidelines to prevent custodial abuse and ensure the rights of detainees.
*. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (*): Outlined the treatment standards for prisoners and detainees, emphasizing humane conditions.
*. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (*): Expanded the scope of personal liberty and fundamental rights under Article *.
*. Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (*): Ensured the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, enhancing detainee rights.
*. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (*): Highlighted the rights of prisoners, including against inhumane treatment and solitary confinement.
*. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (*): Emphasized the right to a speedy trial and humane treatment in detention.
*. **Nilabati Be

i need relavant case laws with highlighted contexts for my case study

Here are some relevant Indian case laws with brief explanations and highlighted contexts:
*. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (*):
- Context: Established the right to privacy as a fundamental right.

*. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*):
- Context: Guidelines to prevent custodial abuse and ensure detainee rights.

*. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (*):
- Context: Treatment standards for prisoners and detainees, emphasizing humane conditions.

*. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (*):
- Context: Expanded the scope of personal liberty and fundamental rights under Article *.

*. Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (*):
- Context: Right to be informed of grounds of arrest, enhancing detainee rights.

*. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (*):
- Context: Rights of prisoners, including against inhumane treatment and solitary confinement.

*. **Hussainara Khatoon v. State

Finding Missing Son Abroad

Summary

Full Conversation

Related Chats