Parental Rights Termination Case

Summary

The case In re C.M.C., 273 S.W.3d 862, involved the termination of parental rights due to endangerment and non-compliance with court orders. The court determined that the opportunity to defend was adequate, even though the hearing was not officially termed a show cause hearing.

Full Conversation

In re C.M.C., * S.W.3d * (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] *, no pet.) what was this concerning
The case "In re C.M.C., * S.W.3d * (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] *, no pet.)" concerned the termination of parental rights. The court reviewed whether the evidence was sufficient to support the termination of the mother's parental rights to her child based on endangerment and failure to comply with a court order.
Did it have anything to do with this The court held that even though the trial court did not officially call the hearing a "show cause" hearing, the litigant had an opportunity to defend themselves, which was enough.
Yes, the case "In re C.M.C." did address whether the litigant had an opportunity to defend themselves despite the hearing not being officially called a "show cause" hearing. The court found that the opportunity to defend was sufficient. Do you have any other questions about this case or need further information on a related topic?