Child Support Modification Appeal

Summary

The user is appealing a child support and access modification case in Texas. They believe the trial judges findings and conclusions are not based on the case record. They have filed a motion to abate the appeal for the judge to file the findings and conclusions. The user is considering filing a motion for reconsideration with the third Court of Appeal to revisit the judges findings and conclusions. The users motion for a new trial was denied, and they claim to have the complete case record supporting their claims.

Full Conversation

I I lost my trial and I have file the appeal with the third Court of a field in Texas
What is the specific area of law your case falls under? This will help me provide more accurate information.
I case is a modification of child support and access
What is the current arrangement for child support and access, and what modifications are you seeking?
I already file appeal with the third Court of appeal in Texas
What are the specific modifications you are seeking in your child support and access arrangement?

For Texas, child support modifications generally require a significant change in circumstances.
Question is different my question is that I file motion to update the appeal so that trial judge can file is finding the facts and the conclusion of law is finding the facts and the conclusions of law are not based on the case record I would like to file the motion for reconciliation with the court of a field can I do that that if my question
What is the basis for your belief that the judge's findings and conclusions are not based on the case record?

In Texas, you can file a motion to reconsider, but it's typically used to correct factual errors.
I want you to act like an experienced appalette attorney practicing in the state of Texas. I want you to completely understand the following facts and then answer my question that I have put at the end. Please consider the following situation. I lost my trial case on motion for modification in Williamson county Texas I timely filed appeal on this matter with the Texas court of appeal. The trial judge had failed to file findings of facts and the conclusions of law in my case. I filed motion to abate the appeal so the trial judge can file the finding the facts and the conclusion of law. the court of appeal granted my motion to abate the appeal. the trial judge finally filed his finding the facts and the conclusion of law which are not based on the case record My question is that can I file a motion for reconsideration with the third Court of appeal to revisit the findings of facts and the conclusions of law that the judge has filed and they are wrong as they are not supported by the case record
Did you already file a motion for new trial in the trial court before filing the appeal? This is often a prerequisite for challenging factual findings in Texas.
My motion for new trial was denied
What was the reason given for the denial of your motion for a new trial?
Judge is not sports to give you any reason to deny your motion
What evidence do you have to support your claim that the judge's findings of facts and conclusions of law are not based on the case record?
I have the complete case record for the appallet record thatwsupports that
What specific discrepancies can you point out between the judge's findings and the case record?