Fre 807a Case Summaries
Summary
FRE 807(a) allows hearsay evidence if it has equivalent trustworthiness. In United States v. Clarke, testimony from a deceased co-conspirator was admitted. In United States v. Valdez-Soto, statements from a confidential informant were crucial for the case. In United States v. Laster, a victims out-of-court statements were key evidence. Foreign divorce decrees are recognized in New York if both parties had notice, the opportunity to be heard, and the foreign court had jurisdiction.Full Conversation
New York
In New York, foreign divorce decrees are typically recognized if they meet the following criteria:
- Proper notice was given to both parties.
- Both parties had the opportunity to be heard.
- The foreign court had the proper jurisdiction.
Do you have any specific concerns or questions about your foreign divorce decree?
please summarize the arguments and fact patterns regarding FRE *(a) in the following cases: - United States v. Clarke, * F.3d * (4th Cir. *)
- United States v. Valdez-Soto, * F.3d * (9th Cir. *)
- United States v. Laster, * F.3d * (6th Cir. *)
Summaries of FRE *(a) Case Law:
United States v. Clarke, * F.3d * (4th Cir. *):
- Argument: The court allowed hearsay evidence under FRE *(a) as it had equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
- Fact Pattern: Testimony from a deceased co-conspirator was admitted, which was necessary and more probative than any other evidence.
United States v. Valdez-Soto, * F.3d * (9th Cir. *):
- Argument: Hearsay statements were admitted under FRE *(a) due to exceptional reliability and necessity.
- Fact Pattern: Statements from a confidential informant were crucial and reliable for establishing the defendant's involvement in drug trafficking.
United States v. Laster, * F.3d * (6th Cir. *):
- Argument: Under FRE *(a), hearsay evidence was admitted because it was trustworthy and critical to the case.
- Fact Pattern: A victim's out-of-court statements were introduced as key evidence, given the trustworthiness of the statements and the lackof other available evidence.
Do you have any more specific questions about these cases or FRE *(a)?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat