Child Custody Enforcement Principles

Summary

The case In re Corder highlights the importance of considering the childs best interests in enforcement actions, cautioning against punitive measures like incarceration. Other Texas cases, such as Ex parte Griffin and Ex parte Rosser, emphasize careful use of contempt powers. If facing enforcement threats for missed child support, consider res judicata if a previous case was dismissed with prejudice. Filing a motion to dismiss or grievance against opposing counsel may be options. You can file motions proactively, even before being served, and consult a family law attorney for guidance. In Houstons 310th Family Court, motions may be heard via submission docket or oral hearing, depending on complexity.

Full Conversation

Well I thought that the case touched on The court held that enforcement actions should not be pursued in a manner that disregards the best interests of the child. Excessive or punitive measures, such as threats of incarceration without considering the child's welfare, can be deemed an abuse of the enforcement process. Is that not true?
Yes, your interpretation is accurate. The case "In re Corder" emphasizes the importance of considering the best interests of the child in enforcement actions. Punitive measures that do not take the child's welfare into account can indeed be seen as an abuse of the enforcement process.
Do you need more details about this case or how it may apply to a specific situation?
Okay great, are there other cases that highlight the principle or touch on the principle that using threats of incarceration violate what the enforcement process is intended to do?
Sure! Here are a few other cases from Texas that touch on the principle that using threats of incarceration in enforcement actions can be inappropriate:
- Ex parte Griffin, * S.W.2d * (Tex. *): This case addresses the misuse of contempt powers and emphasizes considering the best interests of the parties involved.
- Ex parte Rosser, * S.W.2d * (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] *): The court ruled that threats of incarceration should be used carefully and only when justified by the circumstances.
Is there a specific aspect or type of enforcement situation you are looking into?
Well yeah I can explain the scenario, opposing counsel is using threats of incarceration and jail time because of 2 months of missed child support which seems a little excessive
It's important to understand that while missed child support payments can lead to enforcement actions, threats of incarceration should be balanced with the best interests of the child and the circumstances of non-payment.
- Threats of incarceration for missed child support payments can be seen as excessive, especially if they do not consider the overall circumstances and the welfare of the child.
- The Texas Family Code emphasizes that enforcement actions should consider the best interests of the child (Tex. Fam. Code § *.*).
Have you had any prior issues with child support payments or enforcement actions?
There was an enforcement action against me from the same opposing counsel but he nonsuited because I paid over 30k to his client and he dismissed the case with prejudice, so he could be using that case against me for a new case but that violates res judicata, and he's using threats against me despite filing an enforcement 3 months ago and seems to be over doing it or litigating for the purpose of harrassment not for the purpose of the childrens's best interests
In your situation, the principles of res judicata (which prevents the same issue from being litigated again if it has already been resolved) and the misuse of enforcement actions for harassment are relevant. Here are some key points:
- Res Judicata: If the previous case was dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be brought up again.
- Best Interests of the Child: Enforcement actions should consider the child's welfare (Tex. Fam. Code § *.*).
- Harassment: Repeated threats of incarceration can be deemed excessive and abusive.
Have you considered discussing these concerns with a legal professional to explore any potential defenses or counteractions?
What kind of counter actions can I take, will filing a grievance be appropriate or are there other counter measures I can take?
You can consider the following counteractions:
- Motion to Dismiss: File a motion to dismiss the enforcement action based on res judicata.
- Filing a Grievance: File a grievance with the State Bar of Texas if you believe the opposing counsel's actions are unethical.
- Protective Order: Seek a protective order against harassment.
Have you consulted with a family law attorney about these options?
But I haven't techinically been served with his enforcement yet, do I have to wait till I'm served before I can file any counter measures?
You don't have to wait to be served to prepare your counteractions. You can:
- Gather evidence supporting your claims.
- Consult with a family law attorney to discuss potential preemptive measures.
- Prepare a motion to dismiss based on res judicata.
Have you collected all necessary documentation from the previous case?
Well the res judicata argument applies since he is trying to use the past arrears against me as evidence of history of non compliance with this new case, however this new case only has 2 months of unpaid child support which were just paid off by me recently. Can I still file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action before being served or are now the circumstances different? Also, I intend to modify the order, should I modify the order already or should I wait till I'm served?
You can file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action based on res judicata even before being served. It might be strategic to file for a modification of the order now, depending on your situation.
Have you consulted with a family law attorney about the best timing for your motion and modification?
So can I file a res judicata motion or a motion to dismiss the enforcement action because the child support has already been paid?
Yes, you can file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action based on res judicata, especially since the previous case was dismissed with prejudice and the child support has been paid. Include evidence of the payment and the previous dismissal in your motion. Consulting with a family law attorney for guidance on the exact timing and strategy would be beneficial.
Okay but I'm saying since the previous enforcement action, I fell behind only two months and those two months falling behind are what led to another enforcement action. Since I've since paid off the balance of the two months can I still file a motion to dismiss despite not being served yet or what?
You can still file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action even though you have not been served yet. Ensure your motion includes:
- Proof of payment for the two months in question.
- Documentation of the previous case dismissal with prejudice.
Consult a family law attorney for personalized advice.
Is there anything else you need help with?
Okay, and also include in their recent enforcement action are allegations that I did not return the children to the mom's residence on the 28th of December. However, I was under the impression based on the ambiguous language of the order that the children were to be picked up from their mom on the 28th of December. However, I did eventually return the children when the possession period ended because I thought the mom forfeighted her possession. Can I also file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action because the kids were eventually returned and the enforcement seems punitive at this point?
You can file a motion to dismiss the enforcement action for non-return of the children based on the following points:
- Ambiguity in the language of the order.
- The children were eventually returned.
- The enforcement action seems punitive.
Consult with a family law attorney to ensure your motion is well-supported.
Okay, and I can file all of these motions even without being served?
Yes, you can file these motions even without being served. It can be beneficial to be proactive. Make sure to gather all relevant evidence and documentation to support your motions. Consulting with a family law attorney would be advisable for personalized guidance.
And will these motions be considered on an oral hearing or on a submission docket or what?
In Texas, whether your motions will be considered on an oral hearing or a submission docket depends on the court's practices and the nature of the motions. Some courts may decide based on written submissions, while others may require oral hearings. Check the specific court's rules or consult with a family law attorney to understand the procedure for your case.
Would you like more information on how to file these motions?
Yeah, if I intend to file these motion on the 310th court of houston family law what hearing are they typically heard?
In the 310th Family Court in Houston, motions are typically heard in a combination of submission dockets and oral hearings, depending on the nature and complexity of the motion.
- Submission docket: Some motions may be decided based on the written submissions without a hearing.
- Oral hearing: More complex or contested motions may require an oral hearing.
Consult the 310th Court's local rules or a family law attorney for specific guidance on your motions.
Is there anything else you need help with?