TRY ME!
Default Judgment Legal Guidance
Summary
In family law, default judgments are generally sought against parties failing to comply with court orders, not the applicant like your mother. If your mother was coerced into litigation, this should be raised with the court. You can also consider filing complaints about the process and any oversight by judges. Family courts can issue default judgments against solicitors for wasted costs if they acted improperly. Consulting a legal professional for detailed guidance is recommended.Full Conversation
I am writing to formally object to any further litigation capacity assessments regarding my mother, [Mother's Name]. Given the numerous assessments she has already undergone, I believe additional assessments are unnecessary and could be detrimental to her well-being.
Furthermore, I request a pre-emptive motion to prevent any last-minute evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor that could prejudice the matter. This is essential given their previous conduct and lack of timely communication.
Additionally, the opposing solicitor has failed to submit any evidence by the court-ordered deadline, significantly altering the context of our case since our last meeting. This lack of response should be noted, and I request a default judgment in favor of my applications, as the continued non-compliance by the opposing party warrants such action.
I trust you will take this objection and request into account and advise on the best course of action. Thank you for your understanding and support.
It seems like you're navigating a complex legal situation. Here are a few points to consider:
- Objecting to Further Assessments: You can formally object by submitting an application to the court, outlining your reasons and providing evidence of past assessments and their impact on your mother.
- Pre-emptive Motion: You can file a motion to exclude late evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor. Highlight their history of non-compliance and lack of timely communication.
- Default Judgment: If the opposing party failed to comply with court orders, you can request a default judgment. This involves submitting a formal application to the court, referencing their non-compliance.
Since this involves court proceedings, consulting a solicitor for tailored advice would be beneficial. Do you want guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
- Objecting to Further Assessments: You can formally object by submitting an application to the court, outlining your reasons and providing evidence of past assessments and their impact on your mother.
- Pre-emptive Motion: You can file a motion to exclude late evidence submissions by the opposing solicitor. Highlight their history of non-compliance and lack of timely communication.
- Default Judgment: If the opposing party failed to comply with court orders, you can request a default judgment. This involves submitting a formal application to the court, referencing their non-compliance.
Since this involves court proceedings, consulting a solicitor for tailored advice would be beneficial. Do you want guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
MY QUESTION IS - IF I ASK FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT - WHO WILL IT BE AGAINST
A default judgment would typically be against the opposing party who has failed to comply with court orders or deadlines, not against your mother. It's a way to resolve the case due to their non-compliance. Are you currently involved in a specific court case or hearing regarding this issue?
YES. BUT IT WAS MUMS SOL WHO SAID SINCE * THAT MUM HAS CAPACITY TO LITIGATE. SO WHO WILL THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE AGAINST - I DID OUT IN S. SERVICES AND POSSIBLY THE LPAs.
Case Rating: *
A default judgment would generally be against the party that failed to meet court orders or deadlines, such as the opposing solicitor or another party involved (e.g., S. Services), not your mother. It's crucial to clearly identify who is non-compliant. Are you currently working with a solicitor on this matter?
A default judgment would generally be against the party that failed to meet court orders or deadlines, such as the opposing solicitor or another party involved (e.g., S. Services), not your mother. It's crucial to clearly identify who is non-compliant. Are you currently working with a solicitor on this matter?
no i don't have a solicitor but a counsel HELPED ME TO SUBMIT MY * APPLICS TO FAM COURT IN JUNE TO SET ASIDE AND DISCHARGE THE HARSH NMO WITH NO END DATE MADE AGAINST ME.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation involving capacity assessments and potential non-compliance by the opposing party. Here are a few points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother's capacity has been consistently deemed sufficient, the judgment would likely be against the party failing to comply with court orders.
- Default Judgment: This is generally sought against the opposing party who hasn't met obligations, not your mother.
Would you like guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation involving capacity assessments and potential non-compliance by the opposing party. Here are a few points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother's capacity has been consistently deemed sufficient, the judgment would likely be against the party failing to comply with court orders.
- Default Judgment: This is generally sought against the opposing party who hasn't met obligations, not your mother.
Would you like guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
YES PLEASE. I NEED MORE INFO ABOUT EACH - ASI'M STILL NOT SURE WHO THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT SHOULD BE AGAINST.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving litigation capacity and non-compliance by the opposing party. Here's some general guidance:
- Litigation Capacity: If the opposing party (e.g., S. Services) failed to act or comply with orders, a default judgment can be sought against them.
- Default Judgment: This should be pursued against the party who hasn't complied with court orders or deadlines. It's not against your mother but the non-compliant party.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
It seems you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving litigation capacity and non-compliance by the opposing party. Here's some general guidance:
- Litigation Capacity: If the opposing party (e.g., S. Services) failed to act or comply with orders, a default judgment can be sought against them.
- Default Judgment: This should be pursued against the party who hasn't complied with court orders or deadlines. It's not against your mother but the non-compliant party.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to proceed with these legal actions?
BUT MUM WAS USED AS THE APPLICANT IN THE NMO PROCEEDINGS. S. SERVICES PUSHED MUM/FORCED HER TO DO LITIG AGAINST HER WILL AND MY BROTHERS WIFE , HER PARENTS, AND THE GANG THEY HAVE. WITH MY SIBLINGS AND MANY OTHERS - ITS ALL HONOUR BASED ABUSE UPON ME AND MUM - I COULDN'T SAVE MY DAD AND ITS VERY PAINFUL. PLSE NOTE THE BROTHERS WIFE IS VERY ACTIVE AND NEVERAT HOME OVER THE LAST * WEEKS.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're in a challenging situation involving family dynamics and legal proceedings. Here are some general points regarding default judgments and litigation capacity:
- Default Judgment: Usually sought against the party failing to meet court obligations, not the applicant like your mum.
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother was forced into litigation, consider reporting it to the court for potential reconsideration.
Would you like more specific guidance on legal actions you can take?
It sounds like you're in a challenging situation involving family dynamics and legal proceedings. Here are some general points regarding default judgments and litigation capacity:
- Default Judgment: Usually sought against the party failing to meet court obligations, not the applicant like your mum.
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother was forced into litigation, consider reporting it to the court for potential reconsideration.
Would you like more specific guidance on legal actions you can take?
YES, THE FAM COURT ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE - AS * JUDGES SAW MUM WAS UNABLE TO FOLLOW PROCEEDINGS BUT THEY DID NOTHING.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation involving family dynamics, litigation capacity, and potential non-compliance by parties involved. Here are some general points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: You may raise concerns with the court about the judges' inaction regarding your mother's ability to follow proceedings.
- Court Complaint: Consider submitting a formal complaint to the court regarding the process and potential oversight by the judges.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to address these legal issues?
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation involving family dynamics, litigation capacity, and potential non-compliance by parties involved. Here are some general points to consider:
- Litigation Capacity: You may raise concerns with the court about the judges' inaction regarding your mother's ability to follow proceedings.
- Court Complaint: Consider submitting a formal complaint to the court regarding the process and potential oversight by the judges.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to address these legal issues?
MY LEGAL REP TOLD ME TO PUT IN MY W. STATEMENT - THAT THIS IS BETWEEN ME, MUMS SOL AND THE COURT - NOT MUM.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a complex legal issue involving family, litigation capacity, and potential non-compliance. Here's some general guidance:
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother was involved under coercion, this should be raised with the court.
- Default Judgment: Should be pursued against the non-compliant party, not your mother.
Seeking detailed advice from a legal professional is recommended. Would you like more information on how to address these legal challenges?
It seems you're dealing with a complex legal issue involving family, litigation capacity, and potential non-compliance. Here's some general guidance:
- Litigation Capacity: If your mother was involved under coercion, this should be raised with the court.
- Default Judgment: Should be pursued against the non-compliant party, not your mother.
Seeking detailed advice from a legal professional is recommended. Would you like more information on how to address these legal challenges?
YES PLEASE.
Case Rating: *
You're dealing with a complex legal situation involving litigation capacity and potential coercion. Here are some general steps:
- Litigation Capacity Concerns: Submit concerns to the court if your mother was coerced into litigation.
- Default Judgment: Pursue against the party failing to comply with court orders, not your mother.
- Court Complaints: Consider filing complaints about the process and judges' oversight.
Consulting with a solicitor for detailed guidance would be beneficial. Let me know if you need further assistance!
You're dealing with a complex legal situation involving litigation capacity and potential coercion. Here are some general steps:
- Litigation Capacity Concerns: Submit concerns to the court if your mother was coerced into litigation.
- Default Judgment: Pursue against the party failing to comply with court orders, not your mother.
- Court Complaints: Consider filing complaints about the process and judges' oversight.
Consulting with a solicitor for detailed guidance would be beneficial. Let me know if you need further assistance!
OK THANK YOU.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're navigating a challenging legal situation involving family dynamics and potential non-compliance by the opposing party. Here are some steps to consider:
- Litigation Capacity Concerns: Raise these with the court if your mother was coerced into litigation.
- Default Judgment: Pursue it against the non-compliant party, not your mother.
- Court Complaints: Consider filing if there was oversight by the judges.
Consulting a solicitor for detailed advice would be beneficial. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
It seems you're navigating a challenging legal situation involving family dynamics and potential non-compliance by the opposing party. Here are some steps to consider:
- Litigation Capacity Concerns: Raise these with the court if your mother was coerced into litigation.
- Default Judgment: Pursue it against the non-compliant party, not your mother.
- Court Complaints: Consider filing if there was oversight by the judges.
Consulting a solicitor for detailed advice would be beneficial. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
CAN THE FAM COURT MAKE THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST MUMS SOL FOR WASTED COSTS
Case Rating: *
Family courts can issue a default judgment against a solicitor for wasted costs if they find that the solicitor acted improperly, unreasonably, or negligently. Such an order is typically against the party or their solicitor who caused unnecessary expenses. Consulting with a legal professional might provide tailored guidance. If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask!
Family courts can issue a default judgment against a solicitor for wasted costs if they find that the solicitor acted improperly, unreasonably, or negligently. Such an order is typically against the party or their solicitor who caused unnecessary expenses. Consulting with a legal professional might provide tailored guidance. If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask!
OK SO I WILL PUT THIS TO MY LEGAL REP AND SEE WHAT HE SUGGESTS.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Since you plan to discuss this with your legal representative, it's a good step to take. If you need further assistance or have more questions in the future, feel free to reach out.
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Since you plan to discuss this with your legal representative, it's a good step to take. If you need further assistance or have more questions in the future, feel free to reach out.
HI - PLEASE CAN YOU LOOK AT THIS TEXT AND LET ME KNOW IF NEW EVIDENCE CAN BE RELIED ON IN A REMITTED HEARING TO ET BY COURT OF APPEAL - "the appropriate procedure for challenging a tribunal's decision on the basis of fresh evidence. The correct course will, almost always, be to apply to the tribunal for a review under rule *(*)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. A tribunal is normally better placed than the EAT to deal with the second and third Ladd v Marshall questions, i.e. whether the evidence is credible and whether it is likely to have an influence on the outcome." AS IN LAST HEARING AT ET THE JUDGE SAID THAT A REMITTED HEARING/MATTER MEANS NO NEW EVIDENCE. THIS IS WRONG.
Case Rating: *
In a remitted hearing by the Court of Appeal, new evidence can be introduced under certain conditions:
- Apply for a review under Rule *(*)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
- The tribunal assesses the credibility and potential impact of new evidence following Ladd v Marshall criteria.
Do you want more guidance on how to proceed with this?
In a remitted hearing by the Court of Appeal, new evidence can be introduced under certain conditions:
- Apply for a review under Rule *(*)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
- The tribunal assesses the credibility and potential impact of new evidence following Ladd v Marshall criteria.
Do you want more guidance on how to proceed with this?
YES PLEASE.
Case Rating: *
In a remitted hearing, introducing new evidence depends on the tribunal's discretion. To proceed:
- Submit a formal application for a review under Rule *(*)(d).
- Clearly demonstrate how the new evidence meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria.
- Highlight its potential impact on the outcome.
If you need more assistance or have questions, let me know!
In a remitted hearing, introducing new evidence depends on the tribunal's discretion. To proceed:
- Submit a formal application for a review under Rule *(*)(d).
- Clearly demonstrate how the new evidence meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria.
- Highlight its potential impact on the outcome.
If you need more assistance or have questions, let me know!
I ASKED THE ET JUDGE TO LET ME RELY ON * PIECES OF EVIDENCE - *. MY SUPP IMPACT STATENENT WHICH THIS JUDGE REFUSED TO BE ADMITTED AT THE ORIGINAL ET HEARING *. A SIGNATURE BY MY PHYSIO WHICH SHE DID NOT PROVIDE FOR THE ORIGINAL HEARING BECAUSE SHE WAS WORKING FROM HOME IN MAY * AND DID NOT HAVE FACILITY TO PRINT/SCAN ETC. *. A FAVOURABLE JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER ET DATED SEPT * - AS THIS WAS MADE/GIVEN * MONTHS AFTER MY OLD ET HEARING IN THIS MATTER IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE ABLE TO USE IT. *.
A MEDICAL EVID FROM MY OTHER PHYSIOTHERAPIST DATED * MAY * WHICH WAS * DAYS AFTER MY DISABILITY STATUS HEARING - I HAD REQUESTED IT PRIOR TO THE ET HEARING OF * MAY *. *. TEXTS OF ALL APPOINTMENTS WITH MY SPORTS THERAPIST PRIOR TO MY DISMISSAL
Case Rating: *
In a remitted hearing, you can introduce new evidence under Rule *(*)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules. To strengthen your case:
- Ensure the evidence meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria: credibility, potential impact, and why it wasn't presented earlier.
- Highlight the importance of each evidence piece in your application.
Would you like further guidance on how to proceed?
In a remitted hearing, you can introduce new evidence under Rule *(*)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules. To strengthen your case:
- Ensure the evidence meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria: credibility, potential impact, and why it wasn't presented earlier.
- Highlight the importance of each evidence piece in your application.
Would you like further guidance on how to proceed?
PLEASE NOTE ALL THESE * DOCS R RELEVANT TO THE * ISSUES REMITTED BACK BY THE C OF APPEAL. ALSO, I HAD BEEN ASKING MY LEGAL REP FOR SEVERAL WEEKS PRIOR TO THE HEARING WHAT MEDICAL EVIDENCE DO I NEED TO GET BUT HE WOULD NOT PROVIDE ME WITH AN ANSWER AND BEFORE HIM I HAD ANOTHER SOLICITOR WHO ALSO WASTED TIME AND REFUSED TO LET ME KNOW WHAT SORT OF EVID I NEEDED FOR MY DISABILITY STATUS HEARING.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving remitted hearings and new evidence. Here's some guidance:
- New Evidence: Emphasize the relevance and necessity of each document for the remitted issues.
- Application: Clearly explain why each piece wasn't available earlier and how it meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria.
Would you like more detailed guidance on presenting these documents effectively in the remitted hearing?
It seems you're dealing with a complicated legal situation involving remitted hearings and new evidence. Here's some guidance:
- New Evidence: Emphasize the relevance and necessity of each document for the remitted issues.
- Application: Clearly explain why each piece wasn't available earlier and how it meets the Ladd v Marshall criteria.
Would you like more detailed guidance on presenting these documents effectively in the remitted hearing?
YES PLEASE AND CAN YOU LET ME KNOW IF THE REASONS I HAVE GIVEN - DO THEY MEET THE CRITERIA IN THE LADD V MARSHALL CASE?
Case Rating: *
In the context of Ladd v Marshall, new evidence must meet these criteria:
- Relevance: Evidence must be directly relevant to the issues remitted by the Court of Appeal.
- Credibility: Evidence must be credible and trustworthy.
- Impact: Evidence should likely influence the outcome.
- Availability: Explain why it wasn't available during the original hearing.
Would you like more specific guidance on presenting these documents?
In the context of Ladd v Marshall, new evidence must meet these criteria:
- Relevance: Evidence must be directly relevant to the issues remitted by the Court of Appeal.
- Credibility: Evidence must be credible and trustworthy.
- Impact: Evidence should likely influence the outcome.
- Availability: Explain why it wasn't available during the original hearing.
Would you like more specific guidance on presenting these documents?
YES PLEASE AS THE FIRST * CRITERIA ARE MET BUT REGARDING THE AVAILALBILITY - PLEASE CAN YOU CHECK AND LET ME KNOW.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're navigating a complex legal situation. For the availability criterion in Ladd v Marshall:
- Availability: Clearly demonstrate why each piece wasn't accessible during the original hearing. Mention any obstacles like lack of resources, timing issues, or communication gaps with legal representatives. Each reason should justify the unavailability in the previous hearing.
If you require further assistance or more specific guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're navigating a complex legal situation. For the availability criterion in Ladd v Marshall:
- Availability: Clearly demonstrate why each piece wasn't accessible during the original hearing. Mention any obstacles like lack of resources, timing issues, or communication gaps with legal representatives. Each reason should justify the unavailability in the previous hearing.
If you require further assistance or more specific guidance, feel free to ask!
MY * LEGAL REPS - THE 1ST ONE FLATLY REFUSED TO GIVE ME THE ADVICE EVEN THOUGH HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO PUT MY CASE IN ORDER FOR THE DISABILITY STATUS HEARING AND TO TRY TO GET A SETTLEMENT. THE SOL BEFORE HIM ALSO FAILED TO PROVIDE THIS ADVICE TO ME - INSTEAD HE AGREED WITH THE RESPONDENT NOT TO CARRY PUT/FOLLOW THE ET DIRECTIONS AS THEY BOTH TRIED TO BULLY ME TO AGREE TO A LOW SETTLLEMENT. I REFUSED AND MY IMPACT STATEMENT AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE WAS NOT DEALT WITH FULY/PROPERLY. SO * FIRMS OF SOLS REFUSED TO DEAL WITH THE MNEDICAL EVIDENCE REQUIRED TO SHOW I HAD A DISABILITY OR THAT MY IMPAIRMENT WAS LIKELY TO BE LONG TERM AND/OR RECUR..
Case Rating: *
It seems like your situation involves significant legal complexities with potential solicitor negligence and improper conduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
It seems like your situation involves significant legal complexities with potential solicitor negligence and improper conduct. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
NO, BUT PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFT A SEECTION FOR THIS FOR ME TO PUT IN MY REQQUEST TO RELY ON THE NEW EVIDENCE.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here's a draft section you can include in your request to rely on new evidence:
---
Request to Rely on New Evidence
I respectfully request permission to introduce new evidence in the remitted hearing, based on the following grounds:
*. Relevance: The evidence directly pertains to the issues remitted by the Court of Appeal, providing critical insights into the matters under consideration.
*. Credibility: Each piece of evidence is credible, supported by authoritative sources including medical professionals and tribunal judgments.
*. Impact: The evidence is likely to influence the outcome favorably, offering substantial support to my claims.
*. Availability: Despite diligent efforts, I was unable to present this evidence at the original hearing due to communication gaps and lack of guidance from my legal representatives. Multiple solicitors failed to advise on necessary medical documentation, impacting my ability to demonstrate my disability status effectively.
Given these circumstances, I seek the tribunal's understanding to consider this evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair and just resolution to the issues at hand.
---
Feel free to modify it as needed for your specific context!
Certainly! Here's a draft section you can include in your request to rely on new evidence:
---
Request to Rely on New Evidence
I respectfully request permission to introduce new evidence in the remitted hearing, based on the following grounds:
*. Relevance: The evidence directly pertains to the issues remitted by the Court of Appeal, providing critical insights into the matters under consideration.
*. Credibility: Each piece of evidence is credible, supported by authoritative sources including medical professionals and tribunal judgments.
*. Impact: The evidence is likely to influence the outcome favorably, offering substantial support to my claims.
*. Availability: Despite diligent efforts, I was unable to present this evidence at the original hearing due to communication gaps and lack of guidance from my legal representatives. Multiple solicitors failed to advise on necessary medical documentation, impacting my ability to demonstrate my disability status effectively.
Given these circumstances, I seek the tribunal's understanding to consider this evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair and just resolution to the issues at hand.
---
Feel free to modify it as needed for your specific context!
I JUST REMEBERED IF I'M GOING TO DO A STRIKE OUT ON THE ACTIONS/CONDUCT/MORE ABUSE OF PROCESS BY RESPONDENT IN THE RECENT ET HEARING THEN I DON'T THINK I NEED TO DO THIS REQUEST TO RELY ON NEW DOCUMENTS - IS THAT CORRECT?
Case Rating: *
If you're considering a strike-out application due to the respondent's conduct or abuse of process, it could potentially negate the need for introducing new evidence. A strike-out is aimed at dismissing the case based on procedural misconduct. However, if new evidence strengthens your case, it might still be beneficial to pursue it. Consulting with a legal professional would provide tailored advice in this complex situation.
If you're considering a strike-out application due to the respondent's conduct or abuse of process, it could potentially negate the need for introducing new evidence. A strike-out is aimed at dismissing the case based on procedural misconduct. However, if new evidence strengthens your case, it might still be beneficial to pursue it. Consulting with a legal professional would provide tailored advice in this complex situation.
OK THANKS.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're navigating a complex legal situation with potential procedural misconduct and the introduction of new evidence. While a strike-out could address the respondent's conduct, having new evidence might still support your case. It's advisable to consider both avenues. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're navigating a complex legal situation with potential procedural misconduct and the introduction of new evidence. While a strike-out could address the respondent's conduct, having new evidence might still support your case. It's advisable to consider both avenues. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
OK IF I DO BOTH - HOW DO YOU THINK IS THE BEST WAY TO DO IT? DO SEPARATE SUBMISSIONS FOR EACH?
Case Rating: *
In this situation, it would be wise to make separate submissions for each action:
- Strike-Out Application: Submit a detailed application focusing on the respondent's conduct and procedural abuse.
- Request to Rely on New Evidence: File a separate application for introducing new evidence, emphasizing its relevance and importance.
This approach clarifies the purpose of each action and strengthens your case.
In this situation, it would be wise to make separate submissions for each action:
- Strike-Out Application: Submit a detailed application focusing on the respondent's conduct and procedural abuse.
- Request to Rely on New Evidence: File a separate application for introducing new evidence, emphasizing its relevance and importance.
This approach clarifies the purpose of each action and strengthens your case.
IN MY STRIKE OUT ITS ALSO ET ERRORS EG ET FAILED TO CONSIDER OR FOLLW THEIR OWN DIRECTION IN THE JAN * NOTICE OF HEARING SAYING THAT PARTIES SHOULD ATTEND AND IF THEY DON'T TO ENSURE THEIR LEGAL REP IS FULLY PREPARED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REQUIRED. THE RESPOND DID NOT ATTEND AND THEIR SOL WAS NOT WITH FULL INSTRUCTIONS OR PREPARED.
Case Rating: *
In your strike-out application, it's crucial to highlight the Employment Tribunal's (ET) errors, particularly their failure to adhere to procedural directions. Here's how you can proceed:
- Strike-Out Submission: Clearly document the ET's procedural errors and the respondent's non-compliance. Emphasize the impact on your case.
- Separate Requests: Mention any new evidence separately if it supports your claims.
Consider consulting a legal professional for tailored advice on this complex matter. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
In your strike-out application, it's crucial to highlight the Employment Tribunal's (ET) errors, particularly their failure to adhere to procedural directions. Here's how you can proceed:
- Strike-Out Submission: Clearly document the ET's procedural errors and the respondent's non-compliance. Emphasize the impact on your case.
- Separate Requests: Mention any new evidence separately if it supports your claims.
Consider consulting a legal professional for tailored advice on this complex matter. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
OK, THANK YOU.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're navigating a complex legal situation involving procedural misconduct and the introduction of new evidence. Making separate submissions for each action (strike-out and new evidence) is a strategic approach. If you need more guidance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
It seems you're navigating a complex legal situation involving procedural misconduct and the introduction of new evidence. Making separate submissions for each action (strike-out and new evidence) is a strategic approach. If you need more guidance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
hi PLEASE CAN YOU LET ME KNOW IF ANOTHER COURT HAS BEEN SENT AND RESENT MY STATEMENT OF TRUTH WITH SIGNATURE ON IT FOR MY N244 APPLIC TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT - WHY HAS THIS COURT WRITTEN AGAIN ASKING FOR IT?
Case Rating: *
It seems that the court is asking for your Statement of Truth with a signature again because it might not have been properly received or considered complete in the previous submission. Here are some potential reasons:
- The initial submission might have been unclear, incomplete, or not in the required format.
- The court requires specific documentation or confirmation via a signed statement for legal formalities.
To address this, ensure that the document is correctly completed, signed, and submitted as per the court's instructions. If you're unsure, you can contact the court for clarification on what might be missing or incorrect.
It seems that the court is asking for your Statement of Truth with a signature again because it might not have been properly received or considered complete in the previous submission. Here are some potential reasons:
- The initial submission might have been unclear, incomplete, or not in the required format.
- The court requires specific documentation or confirmation via a signed statement for legal formalities.
To address this, ensure that the document is correctly completed, signed, and submitted as per the court's instructions. If you're unsure, you can contact the court for clarification on what might be missing or incorrect.
I CALLED THEM YESTERDAY AFTER A LOMG WAIT OF * MINS I GOT THROUGH, BUT SHE ONLY HAD THE NOTES OF THEIR EMAIL TO ME OF EARLY AUG FROM ANOTHER DEPT. THE EMAIL TRAIL OF THEIR EMAIL TO ME OF * AUG ASKIING FOR MY SIGNATURE FOR 3RD TIME SHOWS I SENT IT ON * JUNE AND RESENT IT ON * JULY.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like there's a communication gap with the court regarding your submission. You might want to try the following:
- Ensure the document is in the correct format and includes all required details.
- Consider visiting the court in person if feasible, to clarify the issue directly.
- Consult legal assistance to ensure your submissions meet all necessary requirements.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like there's a communication gap with the court regarding your submission. You might want to try the following:
- Ensure the document is in the correct format and includes all required details.
- Consider visiting the court in person if feasible, to clarify the issue directly.
- Consult legal assistance to ensure your submissions meet all necessary requirements.
If you have more questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
I PRINTED AND SIGNED THE LAST PAGE WITH STATEMENT OF TRUTH AND ATTACHED IT TO MY EMAIL ON * JUNE. I RESENT IT ON * JULY BECAUSE ON * JULY THE COURT APOLOGISED SAYING THEY NEED THE FULL N244 BACK WITH ALL DOCS.
Case Rating: *
It seems there might be a misunderstanding or an incomplete submission. Here are a few steps you might consider:
- Double-check that the full N244 form with all required documents is attached.
- Confirm that your email was sent with attachments visible and readable.
- Consider sending the documents through registered mail as an additional backup.
If you have further questions or need more assistance, feel free to ask!
It seems there might be a misunderstanding or an incomplete submission. Here are a few steps you might consider:
- Double-check that the full N244 form with all required documents is attached.
- Confirm that your email was sent with attachments visible and readable.
- Consider sending the documents through registered mail as an additional backup.
If you have further questions or need more assistance, feel free to ask!
I CAN'T PRINT THEM ALL DUE TO TECH ISSUES AND I'VE HAD THE CAR ACCIDENT. PLEASE NOTE ITS NOT ACCEPTABLE THAT AFTER I SEBNT THIS COURT DETAILS OF MY CAR ACCID AND FIT NOTE I GOT THIS EMAIL FOR 3RD TIME ASKING ME TO SIGN IT AGAIN. SURELY THE COURT NEED TO GIV REASONABLE ADJUSTMENT.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a significant issue involving a car accident and potential court procedural difficulties. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
It seems you're dealing with a significant issue involving a car accident and potential court procedural difficulties. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
NO, PLEASE CAN YOU DRAFT ME A ROBUST EMAIL TO SEND TO COURT REG THEIR REGUSAL TO PROGRESS MY APPLICATION.
Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here's a draft email you can use to address the court regarding their repeated requests and your current situation:
---
Subject: Urgent: Request for Reasonable Adjustment and Clarification on N244 Submission
Dear [Court's Contact Name/Department],
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the repeated requests for my signed Statement of Truth in relation to my N244 application to set aside a default judgment. I have already sent the signed statement on * June and resent it on * July as per your instructions.
Given my current circumstances, including a recent car accident and the provision of a fit note, I am unable to print and resend the documentation. I kindly request reasonable adjustments be made to accommodate my situation, per the Equality Act *. This includes accepting the digital copies already submitted, which were sent in good faith and compliance.
I would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and guidance on how to proceed without further delays, as these repeated requests are causing unnecessary stress and hardship.
Thank you for your understanding and assistance.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Contact Information]
---
Feel free to adjust any specific details to better fit your situation. If you have further questions or need additional assistance, feel free to ask!
Certainly! Here's a draft email you can use to address the court regarding their repeated requests and your current situation:
---
Subject: Urgent: Request for Reasonable Adjustment and Clarification on N244 Submission
Dear [Court's Contact Name/Department],
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the repeated requests for my signed Statement of Truth in relation to my N244 application to set aside a default judgment. I have already sent the signed statement on * June and resent it on * July as per your instructions.
Given my current circumstances, including a recent car accident and the provision of a fit note, I am unable to print and resend the documentation. I kindly request reasonable adjustments be made to accommodate my situation, per the Equality Act *. This includes accepting the digital copies already submitted, which were sent in good faith and compliance.
I would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and guidance on how to proceed without further delays, as these repeated requests are causing unnecessary stress and hardship.
Thank you for your understanding and assistance.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Contact Information]
---
Feel free to adjust any specific details to better fit your situation. If you have further questions or need additional assistance, feel free to ask!
THANK YOU - PLEASE SEE MY EMAIL OF * JULY TO COURT MANAGER - HERE IS HALF OF IT - "I am writing to enclose the signed page of my N244 application, along with all supporting documents previously sent to the court on * March *.
I am very concerned that my application has not been processed in a timely manner. Despite sending all required documents months ago, I have only received delayed instructions from the court, often after many weeks. Meanwhile, requests from the other side, including their interim charging order, have been dealt with much more quickly.
I have already informed the court about my health issues, which make delays and uncertainty especially difficult for me. I am also dealing with several legal matters at the same time, which have been clashed altogether. This has increased my stress and made it even more important that my case is handled fairly and promptly."
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves procedural issues and communication challenges with the court. Here's how you might proceed:
- Follow-up: Contact the court directly to confirm receipt of your documents and explain your situation.
- Documentation: Keep records of all communications and submissions for reference.
- Legal Assistance: Consider seeking legal advice to ensure your application is processed correctly.
If you need more guidance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
Your situation involves procedural issues and communication challenges with the court. Here's how you might proceed:
- Follow-up: Contact the court directly to confirm receipt of your documents and explain your situation.
- Documentation: Keep records of all communications and submissions for reference.
- Legal Assistance: Consider seeking legal advice to ensure your application is processed correctly.
If you need more guidance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
HERE IS THE REST OF IT - "I am also concerned that when I called the court at the end of May to chase up my application, I was not told that my fee had been missed. I don't understand how my application was not looked at for over two months. If I had been informed at that time, I could have resolved the issue much sooner and avoided further delays.
I respectfully request that my application is now processed without further delay and that I am treated equally to the other party in this case.
Please confirm receipt of these documents and provide an urgent update on the progress of my application.
Please emails below but I note my emails of March are missing."
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're facing a complex situation with communication challenges and procedural issues with the court. Here's a suggestion for your situation:
- Follow-up: Consider contacting the court directly to verify that your documents have been received and to clarify your circumstances.
- Documentation: Maintain a detailed record of all communications and submissions for reference in future interactions.
- Legal Assistance: Consulting a solicitor may help ensure your application is processed correctly and timely.
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're facing a complex situation with communication challenges and procedural issues with the court. Here's a suggestion for your situation:
- Follow-up: Consider contacting the court directly to verify that your documents have been received and to clarify your circumstances.
- Documentation: Maintain a detailed record of all communications and submissions for reference in future interactions.
- Legal Assistance: Consulting a solicitor may help ensure your application is processed correctly and timely.
If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
MY COUNSEL WHO IS DEALING WITH FAM MATTER SAID HE WILL DEAL WITH THIS MATTER IN HEARING LISTED FOR FAM MATTER, BUT YESTERDAY THIS COURT TOLD ME THEY ARE ONLY DEALING WITH IT - EVEN THOUGH THE APPLICANT IS A PREVIOUS SOL IN MY FAM CASE WHO WAS GROSSLY NEGLIGENT.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like a complex situation involving multiple legal matters and potential negligence by a previous solicitor. Here are some general points to consider:
- Family Court Hearing: Clarify with your counsel how the family court will address your concerns and the role of the previous solicitor.
- Negligence Allegations: Document any evidence of negligence by your previous solicitor for potential legal actions.
If you need further guidance on handling these issues, feel free to ask!
It sounds like a complex situation involving multiple legal matters and potential negligence by a previous solicitor. Here are some general points to consider:
- Family Court Hearing: Clarify with your counsel how the family court will address your concerns and the role of the previous solicitor.
- Negligence Allegations: Document any evidence of negligence by your previous solicitor for potential legal actions.
If you need further guidance on handling these issues, feel free to ask!
IN MY SET ASIDE APPLICATION OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT I RELIED ON DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM AS I DID NOT GET THE CLAIM NOTICE AND THE PREV SOL NEVER INFORNED ME OF THIS BUT JUST GOT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT.
Case Rating: *
It looks like you have a serious issue with a default judgment due to lack of notification from a previous solicitor. Here’s some general advice:
- Set Aside Application: Emphasize the lack of notice and the previous solicitor's failure to inform you.
- Defence and Counterclaim: Clearly outline your reasons and any defenses you have.
- Documentation: Ensure all communications and evidence supporting your claims are well-documented.
If you have further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
It looks like you have a serious issue with a default judgment due to lack of notification from a previous solicitor. Here’s some general advice:
- Set Aside Application: Emphasize the lack of notice and the previous solicitor's failure to inform you.
- Defence and Counterclaim: Clearly outline your reasons and any defenses you have.
- Documentation: Ensure all communications and evidence supporting your claims are well-documented.
If you have further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
I ONLY SENT DEFENCE/COUNTERCLAIM INMY IWITNESS STATEMENT TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT.
Case Rating: *
In your application to set aside the default judgment, it's crucial to ensure that your defense and counterclaim are clearly outlined in your witness statement. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Comprehensive Defense: Ensure that your defense addresses all points raised in the default judgment, providing evidence and arguments to support your position.
- Counterclaim Details: Clearly explain any counterclaims, providing supporting documentation and legal arguments.
- Legal Assistance: Consider seeking advice from a solicitor to strengthen your application.
If you have further questions or need more guidance, feel free to ask!
In your application to set aside the default judgment, it's crucial to ensure that your defense and counterclaim are clearly outlined in your witness statement. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Comprehensive Defense: Ensure that your defense addresses all points raised in the default judgment, providing evidence and arguments to support your position.
- Counterclaim Details: Clearly explain any counterclaims, providing supporting documentation and legal arguments.
- Legal Assistance: Consider seeking advice from a solicitor to strengthen your application.
If you have further questions or need more guidance, feel free to ask!
BECAUSE THE COSTS TO ME IN FAM MATTER OVERLAP COSTS/COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST THIS PREV SOL - IT SHOULD/COULD BE FAM COURT WHO WILL NEED TO DEAL WITH THIS MATTER TOO.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a complex issue involving overlapping costs in family and counterclaim matters. Here are some considerations:
- Family Court Jurisdiction: The family court may consider matters if they directly relate to ongoing family proceedings, but typically, financial claims against solicitors may be addressed in civil courts.
- Previous Solicitor's Actions: Document any negligence or misconduct for possible legal action.
Consulting a solicitor specialized in family and civil law might provide targeted advice. If you have further questions or need assistance, feel free to ask!
It seems you're dealing with a complex issue involving overlapping costs in family and counterclaim matters. Here are some considerations:
- Family Court Jurisdiction: The family court may consider matters if they directly relate to ongoing family proceedings, but typically, financial claims against solicitors may be addressed in civil courts.
- Previous Solicitor's Actions: Document any negligence or misconduct for possible legal action.
Consulting a solicitor specialized in family and civil law might provide targeted advice. If you have further questions or need assistance, feel free to ask!
I ONLY DID A * PAGE WITNESS STATEMENT INCLUDING IN IT MY DEF / COUNTERCLAIM. BUT PARTICULARISATION OF CLAIM IS OUTSTANDING. WHEN I DID THIS DEF/CC I REMEMBER THIS MATTER WAS INTERFERED WITH BY THE EAT AND THE FAM COURT, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO DO IT WITH FULL PATICULARISATION - NOW I HAD ACCID WHICH IS CONNECTED WITTH ALL THIS.
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with a complex situation involving overlapping legal issues and a car accident that may complicate matters further. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Particularisation of Claim: Ensure your defense and counterclaim are fully detailed. Explain any obstacles, like court interference, in your witness statement.
- Accident Connection: Document how the accident impacts your legal matters, especially if it affects your ability to respond or comply with court procedures.
If you have specific questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
It seems you're dealing with a complex situation involving overlapping legal issues and a car accident that may complicate matters further. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Particularisation of Claim: Ensure your defense and counterclaim are fully detailed. Explain any obstacles, like court interference, in your witness statement.
- Accident Connection: Document how the accident impacts your legal matters, especially if it affects your ability to respond or comply with court procedures.
If you have specific questions or need further guidance, feel free to ask!
HERE IS MY LETTER TO THIS COURT OF * AUG REGARDING MY CAR ACCID - "I am writing to inform you that I was involved in a serious car accident on the evening of * July, the same day I sent in my objections to the interim charging order. I think this accident is connected to the threats I have received about my ongoing legal cases. I have already mentioned these in my request to set aside the default judgment and in my objections to the interim charging order.
One of these threats happened while the creditor was acting as my legal expert in the family case, and the third threat came after the creditor stopped acting for me.
As a result, I am facing challenges in addressing legal matters promptly. I have obtained a medical note from my doctor to support this. Please find it attached.
I ask that you present this email and my medical note to the judge. Please keep my medical information and note private and refrain from sharing them with the other party or their representatives."
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves significant legal complexities, including a car accident, threats, and overlapping legal matters. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
Your situation involves significant legal complexities, including a car accident, threats, and overlapping legal matters. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, I’ll need to ask a few questions to proceed.
Start a new chat