Filing Motion In Dependency

Summary

In Florida dependency cases, filing a motion involves drafting, filing, and serving it to all parties. To challenge case plan stipulations, gather evidence like medical records and negative test results. If dissatisfied with an appointed attorney, consider requesting a change. Present your medical marijuana card and negative test results to contest case plan requirements. Consulting a local attorney for specific guidance is advisable.

Full Conversation

I have a legal question on a dependency case In Florida
Dependency cases can be complex and typically involve the welfare of children. Could you provide more details about your specific concern or question in the dependency case? This will help me give you more precise information.
Issue is I want to file a motion for the judge to decide
It sounds like you want to file a motion in a dependency case. Generally, the process involves drafting the motion and filing it with the court. Here are some general steps:
- Draft the motion, stating clearly what you are requesting.
- Include legal grounds and evidence supporting your request.
- File the motion with the court where your case is being heard.
- Serve the motion to all parties involved.
Since your case is in Florida, it might be helpful to consult a local attorney for specific guidance. Would you like assistance connecting with lawyers who specialize in dependency cases in Florida?
Challenge or dispute something in the caseplan
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you want to challenge or dispute an aspect of the case plan in your dependency case. In Colorado, here are some general steps you might consider:
- Review the case plan thoroughly.
- Gather any evidence or documentation supporting your position.
- Consider filing a motion or objection with the court.
- Consult with a lawyer specializing in dependency cases for detailed guidance.
If you need more specific advice or assistance, consider reaching out to a legal professional who can help guide you through the process. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask!
In florida
Case Rating: *
Since you're dealing with a dependency case in Florida, you may want to consult a local attorney to ensure proper handling of your situation. If you need further assistance or have additional questions, feel free to ask!
I have an appointed attorney but is useless. She doesn’t do anything to help my case. The motion is regarding a stipulation in the caseplan. I will upload the stipulations. However my specific issue is that I don’t feel I should be required to complete weekly random screenings and complete a * week substance abuse class. I completed a 6 month hair follicle test. The allegations against me was for positive meth and amphedamines use. I provided explanation for this due to medication I take that cause false positives.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're facing a frustrating situation with your appointed attorney. In Colorado, you might consider:
- Requesting a change of attorney if you're dissatisfied with your current representation.
- Gathering evidence, such as medical records, to support your claim of false positives.
- Filing a motion to contest the requirement for screenings and classes.
Have you already tried discussing these concerns with the court or your attorney?
now my hair follicle results came back negative for what I was accused of. I did test positive for marijuana and test shows the positive was over 90 days and barely made the cut off. I did obtain my marijuana card. However DCF is stating since I got my marijuana card after positive that I have to follow the case plan
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're in a challenging situation. If you feel your case plan requirements are unfair due to your medical marijuana use, consider:
- Documenting your medical marijuana card and usage timeline.
- Presenting your negative hair follicle test results.
- Requesting a review or modification of the case plan with evidence.
You might want to consult a Colorado attorney for specific advice. Do you have any other questions or need further clarification?