TRY ME!
Spousal Support Case Law
Summary
In Alberta, spousal support and property division during divorce are influenced by the Divorce Act and the Family Law Act. Key cases like Bracklow v. Bracklow and Kachur v. Kachur highlight criteria for awarding or denying spousal support, especially in short marriages with no contribution and issues like abuse. The Matrimonial Property Act guides property division, with cases such as Serra v. Serra and Chutter v. Chutter illustrating factors like economic disparity and contributions. Courts also consider unconscionability, as seen in cases like Miglin v. Miglin and Rick v. Brandsema. For specific legal advice, consulting a local attorney is recommended.Full Conversation
i am looking for case law regarding no compensation for spouse on divorce
Hi Heather! In Alberta, spousal support in divorce cases is governed by the Divorce Act and the Family Law Act. There are specific criteria and case laws that can affect whether compensation is awarded. One landmark case is *Bracklow v. Bracklow*, *. Here are some general points:
- The need for support and the ability to pay.
- Length of the marriage.
- Roles during the marriage.
Could you provide more details about your situation? For example, are you seeking information on specific grounds for no compensation?
- The need for support and the ability to pay.
- Length of the marriage.
- Roles during the marriage.
Could you provide more details about your situation? For example, are you seeking information on specific grounds for no compensation?
examples of cases where this happened
Hi Heather! Sure, here are some examples of cases where no spousal support was awarded in Alberta:
- Bracklow v. Bracklow (*): This case outlines the criteria for awarding spousal support but also provides instances where support may not be required.
- Messier v. Delage (*): No support was awarded due to short marriage and independent financial stability.
- Leskun v. Leskun (*): No support was awarded as the spouse was self-sufficient.
Do you have any specific details or circumstances you want to discuss further?
- Bracklow v. Bracklow (*): This case outlines the criteria for awarding spousal support but also provides instances where support may not be required.
- Messier v. Delage (*): No support was awarded due to short marriage and independent financial stability.
- Leskun v. Leskun (*): No support was awarded as the spouse was self-sufficient.
Do you have any specific details or circumstances you want to discuss further?
division of property
Hi Heather! When it comes to the division of property in Alberta during a divorce, the Matrimonial Property Act is the governing legislation. Here are some key points:
- Equal division of matrimonial property is the starting point.
- Contributions of each spouse to the marriage.
- Length of the marriage.
- Any prior agreements or prenuptial agreements.
Do you have specific details about the property or circumstances that might affect the division?
- Equal division of matrimonial property is the starting point.
- Contributions of each spouse to the marriage.
- Length of the marriage.
- Any prior agreements or prenuptial agreements.
Do you have specific details about the property or circumstances that might affect the division?
cases that show that
Hi Heather! Here are a couple of cases related to the division of property where equal division wasn't applied:
- Serra v. Serra (*): The court considered the economic disparity and contributions to the marriage.
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): The court deviated from equal division due to a prenuptial agreement and individual contributions.
Would you like more details on any specific type of property or circumstances?
- Serra v. Serra (*): The court considered the economic disparity and contributions to the marriage.
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): The court deviated from equal division due to a prenuptial agreement and individual contributions.
Would you like more details on any specific type of property or circumstances?
only married 6 months not contribution at all from spouse. spouse became abusive and drank lots
Heather, given the short duration of your marriage and the circumstances involving abuse and lack of contribution, you might have a strong case for an unequal division of property and potentially avoiding spousal support.
Here's a key question: Are you seeking to file for divorce primarily based on the grounds of abuse and lack of contribution?
Here's a key question: Are you seeking to file for divorce primarily based on the grounds of abuse and lack of contribution?
yes and need case law to back it up
Hi Heather! For short marriages with no contribution and issues like abuse, courts often consider unequal division of property and waiving spousal support. Here are some relevant cases in Alberta:
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): Unequal division due to prenuptial agreement and individual contributions.
- Leskun v. Leskun (*): No support due to self-sufficiency of the spouse.
Would you like more information on these cases or other relevant cases?
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): Unequal division due to prenuptial agreement and individual contributions.
- Leskun v. Leskun (*): No support due to self-sufficiency of the spouse.
Would you like more information on these cases or other relevant cases?
more relevant cases please
Hi Heather! Here are additional examples of cases relevant to your situation:
- Chutter v. Chutter (*): Unequal division due to short marriage and lack of contribution.
- Moge v. Moge (*): Highlights the importance of contributions and economic disparity.
- Gordon v. Goertz (*): Addresses factors like abuse in property division.
Would you like specific details from any of these cases?
- Chutter v. Chutter (*): Unequal division due to short marriage and lack of contribution.
- Moge v. Moge (*): Highlights the importance of contributions and economic disparity.
- Gordon v. Goertz (*): Addresses factors like abuse in property division.
Would you like specific details from any of these cases?
are there more cases likek gordon v. goertz
Hi Heather! Here are a few more cases similar to *Gordon v. Goertz* that involve considerations like abuse and unequal division of property:
- Miglin v. Miglin (*): Examined the impact of abuse and lack of contribution on property division.
- Hartshorne v. Hartshorne (*): Considered unequal division due to the unique circumstances of the marriage.
- Rick v. Brandsema (*): Looked into financial misconduct and abuse impacting property division.
Would you like more details about any of these cases?
- Miglin v. Miglin (*): Examined the impact of abuse and lack of contribution on property division.
- Hartshorne v. Hartshorne (*): Considered unequal division due to the unique circumstances of the marriage.
- Rick v. Brandsema (*): Looked into financial misconduct and abuse impacting property division.
Would you like more details about any of these cases?
what cases show test for unconscionable
Case Rating: *.
Hi Heather! When it comes to the legal concept of unconscionability, courts often examine the fairness of agreements or conduct in a relationship. Here are some cases that illustrate the test for unconscionability:
- Miglin v. Miglin (*): Looked at fairness and circumstances surrounding an agreement.
- Rick v. Brandsema (*): Dealt with financial misconduct and fairness.
- Harry v. Kreutziger (*): Established criteria for unconscionable agreements.
Would you like more details on any of these cases?
Hi Heather! When it comes to the legal concept of unconscionability, courts often examine the fairness of agreements or conduct in a relationship. Here are some cases that illustrate the test for unconscionability:
- Miglin v. Miglin (*): Looked at fairness and circumstances surrounding an agreement.
- Rick v. Brandsema (*): Dealt with financial misconduct and fairness.
- Harry v. Kreutziger (*): Established criteria for unconscionable agreements.
Would you like more details on any of these cases?
are there more
Hi Heather! Here are a few more cases that deal with the test for unconscionability:
- Shelanu Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corp. (*): Examined unfair bargaining power and terms.
- Marshall v. Marshall (*): Addressed unfair terms and circumstances of agreements.
- Norberg v. Wynrib (*): Focused on power imbalance and exploitation.
Would you like more details on any of these cases?
- Shelanu Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corp. (*): Examined unfair bargaining power and terms.
- Marshall v. Marshall (*): Addressed unfair terms and circumstances of agreements.
- Norberg v. Wynrib (*): Focused on power imbalance and exploitation.
Would you like more details on any of these cases?
are there cases that determine how they divide property
Hi Heather! When it comes to property division in Alberta, the Matrimonial Property Act plays a significant role. Here are some key cases that have provided guidance on how property is divided:
- Serra v. Serra (*): Considered economic disparity and contributions.
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): Deviated from equal division due to a prenuptial agreement.
- Chutter v. Chutter (*): Unequal division due to short marriage and lack of contribution.
Would you like more details about any specific case?
- Serra v. Serra (*): Considered economic disparity and contributions.
- Kachur v. Kachur (*): Deviated from equal division due to a prenuptial agreement.
- Chutter v. Chutter (*): Unequal division due to short marriage and lack of contribution.
Would you like more details about any specific case?
test for property division cases
Hi Heather! When it comes to property division cases in Alberta, the courts consider several key factors as per the Matrimonial Property Act. Here are some factors and cases that illustrate the test for property division:
- Contribution to the marriage: *Serra v. Serra (*)*.
- Economic disparity: *Rick v. Brandsema (*)*.
- Abuse or misconduct: *Gordon v. Goertz (*)*.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these cases or factors?
- Contribution to the marriage: *Serra v. Serra (*)*.
- Economic disparity: *Rick v. Brandsema (*)*.
- Abuse or misconduct: *Gordon v. Goertz (*)*.
Would you like more detailed information on any of these cases or factors?
Start a new chat