Jurisdiction In Divorce Cases

Summary

Harris v. Harris, 922 N.E.2d 626, 633 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) is relevant for jurisdiction issues in Indiana divorce cases. If jurisdiction wasnt disputed initially, it may be difficult to contest later. Factors like residency, family ties, and childrens schooling in Indiana are significant. The appointment of a Guardian ad Litem indicates the courts focus on childrens best interests. Consider consulting a local attorney for specific guidance.

Full Conversation

My wife and i was supposed to move back to indiana but she decided not to move after being cought cheating.
Here are some general points regarding jurisdiction and divorce proceedings in Indiana:
- Indiana courts often consider residency and significant connections to the state in jurisdiction matters.
- If jurisdiction wasn't disputed initially, it may be challenging to contest it later.
- Factors like where you were married, lived, and your family's location in Indiana can be significant.
If you need more specific guidance and want to explore connecting with local lawyers, just let me know!
Guardians ad Litem was appointed by the court before she filed petition.
It sounds like there are some complex jurisdictional and family law issues at play. In Indiana, the appointment of a Guardian ad Litem typically relates to the best interests of children involved. Since this situation involves multiple legal aspects, it might be beneficial to consider seeking advice from a local attorney who can provide more specific guidance. Would you like assistance in connecting with a lawyer?
Does Harris v. Harris, * N.E.2d *, * (Ind. Ct. App. *) apply if my wife did not dispute jurisdiction in * hearings? Then she hired a lawyer and claimed she never resided in indiana but was born and mostly raised in indiana along with getting married and ha ing kids there. Lastly, my wifes family lives in indiana.
Case Rating: *
Harris v. Harris, * N.E.2d *, * (Ind. Ct. App. *) may be relevant in your case, as it discusses jurisdiction and the importance of not disputing it initially. Factors like your wife's connections to Indiana and the timing of her jurisdictional claims are crucial. If you have more details about her current residency or any ongoing proceedings, feel free to share.
Does Harris v. Harris, * N.E.2d *, * (Ind. Ct. App. *) apply if my wife did not dispute jurisdiction in * hearings? Then she hired a lawyer and claimed she never resided in indiana but was born and mostly raised in indiana along with getting married and ha ing kids there. Lastly, my wifes family lives in indiana. My wife and i was supposed to move back to indiana but she decided not to move after being cought cheating. Guardians ad Litem was appointed by the court before she filed petition. We are both from indiana and both have most our family in indiana. We only lived in Michigan for 5 years and i now have the kids enrolled in school in indiana along with a stable home. My company has been in indiana aince jan *
Case Rating: *
Harris v. Harris is pertinent because it addresses jurisdiction issues, often considering factors like residency and significant ties to Indiana. In your case, the fact that your wife did not initially dispute jurisdiction and has strong connections to Indiana (like family and marriage) is crucial. You mentioned several important factors such as the children's enrollment in school and your residence in Indiana, which could strengthen your jurisdictional claim.
Would you like any further clarification about this, or assistance in understanding how these factors might impact your case?