Texas Child Support Enforcement

Summary

In Texas, child support enforcement involves specific procedures and defenses. If a parent is served with a notice of hearing, it must be done personally at least 10 days prior. Defenses against enforcement include improper service, lack of jurisdiction, or proof of payment. If a parent fails to appear, a default judgment and arrest warrant may be issued. Law enforcement can enter a home with a valid arrest warrant. Indigent respondents facing possible incarceration are entitled to a court-appointed attorney. Enforcement orders must clearly separate criminal and civil contempt findings. If both are included without clear separation, the order may be challenged as defective.

Full Conversation

Yeah, put it in even simpler terms, especially e
Sure, let's simplify it further:
- (a) If the parent who should pay child support can show the other parent let the child stay with them longer than ordered, they might not have to pay full child support.
- (b) This only counts if the child stayed longer than ordered and the paying parent supported the child during that time.
- (c) The paying parent can argue they couldn't pay because:
*. They didn't have enough money.
*. They had no valuable property to sell.
*. They tried borrowing money but failed.
*. They couldn't get money legally from anywhere.
- (d) If the paying parent supported the child during this time, they can ask for that money back or reduce what they owe.
- (e) They can only ask for an amount up to the regular child support ordered by the court.
Is there any section you want more details on?
They can only ask for an amount up to the regular child support ordered by the court. what does this mean
It means the parent who supported the child during extra time can only request reimbursement up to the amount the court ordered for regular child support. For example, if the court ordered $* per month, they can't ask for more than $*, even if they spent more.
Do you need further clarification on this?
Sec. *.*. NOTICE OF HEARING. (a) The notice of hearing must include the date, time, and place of the hearing. (b) The notice of hearing need not repeat the allegations contained in the motion for enforcement. (c) Notice of hearing on a motion for enforcement of a final order providing for child support or possession of or access to a child, any provision of a final order rendered against a party who has already appeared in a suit under this title, or any provision of a temporary order shall be given to the respondent by personal service of a copy of the motion and notice not later than the 10th day before the date of the hearing. For purposes of this subsection, "temporary order" includes a temporary restraining order, standing order, injunction, and any other temporary order rendered by a court.
Here's a simple breakdown of Sec. *.* on Notice of Hearing:
- (a): The notice must state the date, time, and place of the hearing.
- (b): The notice does not need to repeat the details of the enforcement motion.
- (c): The notice must be personally delivered to the respondent at least 10 days before the hearing. Temporary orders include restraining orders and other temporary directives.
Do you need more information on any part of this?
Can it be delivered in an email
Yes, the conversation can be delivered in an email. If you need any further assistance or more information on a specific section, feel free to ask!
??
In Texas, personal service of the notice (delivered in person) is generally required at least 10 days before the hearing. Email delivery is not typically sufficient for official notice of a hearing.
Would you like more information on how to properly serve notice?
Sec. *.*. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. (a) If a respondent specially excepts to the motion for enforcement or moves to strike, the court shall rule on the exception or the motion to strike before it hears the motion for enforcement. (b) If an exception is sustained, the court shall give the movant an opportunity to replead and continue the hearing to a designated date and time without the requirement of additional service.
In simple terms, Section *.* states:
- (a): If the person responding to the enforcement motion raises a special exception or wants to strike the motion, the court must address these issues first.
- (b): If the court agrees with the exception, the person who filed the motion will get a chance to correct it and the hearing will be rescheduled without needing to serve notice again.
Is there anything specific you need more details on?
On what grounds can you strike an enforcement motion against you
You can strike an enforcement motion against you on the following grounds:
- Improper service: If you were not properly served with the notice.
- Lack of jurisdiction: If the court doesn't have the authority to hear the case.
- Insufficient evidence: If the motion lacks enough evidence to support the claims.
Do you need specific details on any of these grounds?
What about if you already paid off the child support can you strike or does it not matter?
If you've already paid off the child support, you can use that as a defense rather than striking the motion. You would need to provide proof of payment to the court.
Do you need more information on how to present this defense?
Okay so those are the only three reasons you can strike an enforcement motion
If you have paid off your child support, you can present this as a defense rather than striking the enforcement motion. Providing proof of payment is essential.
Would you like more details on how to compile and present your proof of payment to the court?
Sec. *.*. NOTICE OF HEARING, FIRST CLASS MAIL. (a) If a party has been ordered under Chapter * to provide the court and the state case registry with the party's current mailing address, notice of a hearing on a motion for enforcement of a final order or on a request for a court order implementing a postjudgment remedy for the collection of child support may be served by mailing a copy of the notice to the respondent, together with a copy of the motion or request, by first class mail to the last mailing address of the respondent on file with the court and the registry. (b) The notice may be sent by the clerk of the court, the attorney for the movant or party requesting a court order, or any person entitled to the address information as provided in Chapter *. (c) A person who sends the notice shall file of record a certificate of service showing the date of mailing and the name of the person who sent the notice.
In Texas, if a party has provided their current mailing address to the court and state case registry, notice of a hearing for enforcing a child support order can be sent by first-class mail. The sender must file a certificate of service, showing the date of mailing and the sender's name.
Would you like more information on how to handle this notice or any specific part of the process?
Sec. *.*. FAILURE TO APPEAR. If a respondent who has been personally served with notice to appear at a hearing does not appear at the designated time, place, and date to respond to a motion for enforcement of an existing court order, regardless of whether the motion is joined with other claims or remedies, the court may not hold the respondent in contempt but may, on proper proof, grant a default judgment for the relief sought and issue a capias for the arrest of the respondent.
In simple terms, if you are personally served with notice to appear at a hearing but fail to show up, the court can't hold you in contempt. However, they can issue a default judgment based on the evidence presented and a warrant for your arrest.
Do you need more information on how to handle a failure to appear situation?
And that warrant means that they can come and look for you?
Yes, if a warrant is issued for your arrest (called a "capias"), law enforcement can actively look for you and arrest you. This can happen if you fail to appear at a hearing after being properly notified.
Do you need more information on how to handle this situation or prevent a default judgment?
And can they come into your home?
In Texas, law enforcement can enter your home with a valid arrest warrant. However, they usually need a separate search warrant to enter without your permission unless there are exigent circumstances.
Would you like more details on warrants or legal rights during such a situation?
Okay so on a situation like that can they come into your home without your permission?
In Texas, law enforcement can enter your home without your permission if they have a valid arrest warrant. However, they typically need a separate search warrant to search your home unless there are urgent circumstances.
Would you like more details on your rights during such a situation?
Okay so on a failure to appear they can or cannot enter your home?
Law enforcement in Texas can enter your home without your permission if they have a valid arrest warrant for you due to failure to appear. However, they usually need a separate search warrant to search your home unless there are urgent circumstances.
Do you need more information on your rights during such situations?
Sec. *.*. BOND OR SECURITY FOR RELEASE OF RESPONDENT. (a) When the court orders the issuance of a capias as provided in this chapter, the court shall also set an appearance bond or security, payable to the obligee or to a person designated by the court, in a reasonable amount. (b) An appearance bond or security in the amount of $*,* or a cash bond in the amount of $* is presumed to be reasonable. Evidence that the respondent has attempted to evade service of process, has previously been found guilty of contempt, or has accrued arrearages over $*,* is sufficient to rebut the presumption. If the presumption is rebutted, the court shall set a reasonable bond.
Here's a breakdown of Sec. *.*:
- When a capias (arrest warrant) is issued, the court sets an appearance bond or security amount.
- A $*,* appearance bond or $* cash bond is typically seen as reasonable.
- If you tried to evade service, have been found guilty of contempt before, or owe over $*,*, the court might set a higher bond.
Do you need more details about how bonds work or how to challenge one?
Sec. *.*. RECORD. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a record of the hearing in a motion for enforcement shall be made by a court reporter or as provided by Chapter *. (b) A record is not required if: (*) the parties agree to an order; or (*) the motion does not request incarceration and the parties waive the requirement of a record at the time of hearing, either in writing or in open court, and the court approves waiver.
Here’s a simple breakdown of Sec. *.*:
- (a): A record of the enforcement hearing must be made by a court reporter.
- (b): A record is not needed if:
*. The parties agree on an order.
*. The motion does not seek jail time, and both parties waive the record requirement, with court approval.
Would you like more details on when a court record can be waived?
Sec. *.*. PROOF. (a) The movant is not required to prove that the underlying order is enforceable by contempt to obtain other appropriate enforcement remedies. (b) A finding that the respondent is not in contempt does not preclude the court from awarding the petitioner court costs and reasonable attorney's fees or ordering any other enforcement remedy, including rendering a money judgment, posting a bond or other security, or withholding income.
Here's a simple explanation of Sec. *.*:
- (a): The person requesting enforcement (movant) doesn't have to prove the order is enforceable by contempt to get other remedies.
- (b): Even if the respondent isn't found in contempt, the court can still award court costs, attorney's fees, or other enforcement actions like money judgments, bonds, or income withholding.
Do you need more details on any specific enforcement remedies?
(c) The movant may attach to the motion a copy of a payment record. The movant may subsequently update that payment record at the hearing. If a payment record was attached to the motion as authorized by this subsection, the payment record, as updated if applicable, is admissible to prove: (*) the dates and in what amounts payments were made; (*) the amount of any accrued interest; (*) the cumulative arrearage over time; and (*) the cumulative arrearage as of the final date of the record.
Here's an explanation for Sec. *.*(c):
- The person requesting enforcement can attach a payment record to their motion.
- This record can be updated at the hearing.
- The payment record can be used to prove:
*. When and how much payments were made.
*. The amount of accrued interest.
*. The total arrears over time.
*. The total arrears as of the last date in the record.
Do you need more details on how to compile a payment record or its use in court?
(c-*) A respondent may offer evidence controverting the contents of a payment record under Subsection (c).
A respondent may present evidence to dispute the contents of the payment record provided by the movant, challenging the dates, amounts, interest, or arrearages claimed.
Do you need more information on how to gather and present evidence to dispute a payment record?
Sec. *.*. APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY. (a) In a motion for enforcement or motion to revoke community service, the court must first determine whether incarceration of the respondent is a possible result of the proceedings. (b) If the court determines that incarceration is a possible result of the proceedings, the court shall inform a respondent not represented by an attorney of the right to be represented by an attorney and, if the respondent is indigent, of the right to the appointment of an attorney. (c) If the court determines that the respondent will not be incarcerated as a result of the proceedings, the court may require a respondent who is indigent to proceed without an attorney. (d) If the respondent claims indigency and requests the appointment of an attorney, the court shall require the respondent to file an affidavit of indigency. The court may hear evidence to determine the issue of indigency
- (a): The court first checks if jail is a possible result of the enforcement or revocation motion.
- (b): If jail is possible, the court must inform the respondent of their right to an attorney, and if they are indigent, their right to a court-appointed attorney.
- (c): If there's no risk of jail, indigent respondents may have to proceed without an attorney.
- (d): To claim indigency, the respondent must file an affidavit, and the court may review evidence to determine indigency.
Would you like more information on claiming indigency or preparing an affidavit?
So if the respondent shows up to court without an attorney, and jail is requested on the enforcement, the judge might not have the hearing that day if the respondent needs a court appointed attorney?
Yes, if the respondent shows up without an attorney and incarceration is a possible result, the judge may postpone the hearing to allow the respondent to obtain a court-appointed attorney if they qualify as indigent. This ensures the respondent's right to legal representation is upheld.
Do you need more details on how to request a court-appointed attorney?
(d-*) The court may conduct a hearing on the issue of indigency through the use of teleconferencing, videoconferencing, or other remote electronic means if the court determines that conducting the hearing in that manner will facilitate the hearing. (e) Except as provided by Subsection (c), the court shall appoint an attorney to represent the respondent if the court determines that the respondent is indigent. (f) If the respondent is not in custody, an appointed attorney is entitled to not less than 10 days from the date of the attorney's appointment to respond to the movant's pleadings and prepare for the hearing.
Yes, if the court determines the respondent is indigent, they will appoint an attorney, and the attorney must have at least 10 days to prepare if the respondent is not in custody. This may result in the hearing being postponed.
Do you need assistance with preparing for the indigency hearing or any other legal matter?
So is the indignency hearing supposed to be heard during the hearing or sometime before after you are served, and is this primarily dealing with people who are in jail?
In Texas, the indigency hearing can be held before the main hearing if the respondent requests a court-appointed attorney due to potential incarceration. This process is not limited to people in jail; it applies to anyone facing potential jail time in an enforcement proceeding.
Do you need more details on how to request an indigency hearing or the steps involved?
If the respondent is in custody, an appointed attorney is entitled to not less than five days from the date the respondent was taken into custody to respond to the movant's pleadings and prepare for the hearing. (h) The court may shorten or extend the time for preparation if the respondent and the respondent's attorney sign a waiver of the time limit. (i) The scope of the court appointment of an attorney to represent the respondent is limited to the allegation of contempt or of violation of community supervision contained in the motion for enforcement or motion to revoke community supervision.
If the respondent is in custody, the appointed attorney should have at least five days to prepare for the hearing. This time can be adjusted if both the respondent and attorney agree in writing. The court-appointed attorney's role is limited to the specific allegations of contempt or community supervision violations.
Do you need help with preparing for the hearing or understanding your rights during this process?
Sec. *.*. PAYMENT OF APPOINTED ATTORNEY. (a) An attorney appointed to represent an indigent respondent is entitled to a reasonable fee for services within the scope of the appointment in the amount set by the court. (b) The fee shall be paid from the general funds of the county according to the schedule for the compensation of counsel appointed to defend criminal defendants as provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure. (c) For purposes of this section, a proceeding in a court of appeals or the Supreme Court of Texas is considered the equivalent of a bona fide appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
In simple terms, Sec. *.* addresses the payment of court-appointed attorneys for indigent respondents:
- (a): Appointed attorneys are entitled to a reasonable fee set by the court.
- (b): The fee is paid from county funds based on the criminal defense compensation schedule.
- (c): Appeals to higher courts are treated like appeals to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Do you need more details on how attorney fees are calculated or any other part of this process?
Sec. *.*. PROBATION OF CONTEMPT ORDER. The court may place the respondent on community supervision and suspend commitment if the court finds that the respondent is in contempt of court for failure or refusal to obey an order rendered as provided in this title.
Sec. *.* allows the court to place a respondent on community supervision (probation) instead of immediate jail time if they are found in contempt of court for not following an order. This means the court can give you a chance to comply with the order while under supervision.
Do you need more information on how community supervision works or how to comply with court orders?
Sec. *.*. CONTENTS OF ENFORCEMENT ORDER.
Sec. *.* outlines what must be included in an enforcement order. If you need specifics on any part of it, let me know.
Do you have any particular questions about what should be in an enforcement order, or need help understanding how it applies to your case?
f the order imposes incarceration or a fine for criminal contempt, an enforcement order must contain findings identifying, setting out, or incorporating by reference the provisions of the order for which enforcement was requested and the date of each occasion when the respondent's failure to comply with the order was found to constitute criminal contempt. (c) If the enforcement order imposes incarceration for civil contempt, the order must state the specific conditions on which the respondent may be released from confinement.
It sounds like you want to know more about what must be included in an enforcement order that imposes incarceration or a fine for criminal contempt.
Here’s a breakdown:
- The order must detail the specific provisions being enforced and the dates of non-compliance.
- If it imposes incarceration for civil contempt, it must state the conditions for release.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about these requirements?
What if it contains both criminal and civil contempts
In Texas, if an enforcement order involves both criminal and civil contempts, it must include:
- For Criminal Contempt:
- Provisions being enforced.
- Dates of non-compliance.
- Specific findings of criminal contempt.
- For Civil Contempt:
- Conditions for release from confinement.
Do you need more details on how to handle such a mixed contempt order?
Yeah, is it standard for most enforcement orders to contain both
It's not standard for most enforcement orders to contain both criminal and civil contempts, but it can happen depending on the specifics of the case. Each situation is unique and would be handled based on the facts and circumstances presented.
Do you need more information on how to prepare for an enforcement hearing or any specific aspects of the enforcement process?
Then what is standard
Standard enforcement orders typically address either criminal or civil contempt, not both. They generally include:
- Criminal Contempt:
- Specific violations.
- Dates of non-compliance.
- Penalties such as fines or jail time.
- Civil Contempt:
- Conditions for release (e.g., payment of arrears).
Would you like guidance on preparing for an enforcement hearing?
So if they include both then what can you do, doesn't that mean the court chooses which one to enforce
If an enforcement order includes both criminal and civil contempts, the court will detail the specific violations and penalties for each type. The court enforces both aspects, meaning you may face immediate penalties (e.g., fines, jail time) and conditions for release (e.g., compliance with support payments).
Would you like more information on how to prepare for such a situation?
Can an enforcement order be defective if it includes both
Yes, an enforcement order can be potentially defective if it includes both criminal and civil contempts without clear separation and specific findings for each. This could be challenged in court as a due process issue.
Would you like to know how to challenge the enforcement order in such a case?