TRY ME!
Handling Confidential Information Mistake
Summary
Employees must maintain confidentiality even if they receive information by mistake. Unauthorized use or disclosure can lead to disciplinary action. The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) requires proper handling of personal information. If dismissed for such reasons, employees can challenge the decision under the Labour Relations Act (LRA) and approach the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for dispute resolution.Full Conversation
South African labour law
Thank you, Pumeza. Could you please provide more details about your specific issue related to South African labour law? For example, are you dealing with unfair dismissal, workplace discrimination, or something else?
Could I ask you a question regarding the law pertaining to information? Someone sends me email containing confidential salaries info. The person who sends this did it unanimously (uninvited). Never once did the sender of this email contact me to apologise for her error. Her senior, however, writes to the impacted staff, apologising on behalf of the unit, saying "I was informed that you were not the intended recipient of the information sent on."
The sender was never disciplined for negligence, she never wrote an apology to say indeed I made a mistake. Her boss claims that she committed an error. Employees are not told to destroy the information or treat it as confidential after admitting their error. Just saying, there was a human error. There is no reference to any policy.
Are the staff members who obtained this information accountable for how they use it? In the argument that, the person who authorized this email to me never said it was a mistake. Therefore, it has full authorisation.
Thank you for sharing the details. Here are some key points under South African law regarding the handling of mistakenly sent confidential information:
- **Confidentiality Obligation**: Even if information is sent by mistake, employees generally have a duty to maintain confidentiality.
- **POPIA Compliance**: The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) requires the proper handling of personal information, including taking steps to rectify accidental disclosures.
- **Employer Policies**: Typically, workplace policies will outline the steps to take when such errors occur, including instructions to delete the information.
Staff members should still treat the information as confidential and not use it improperly.
Would you like more information on how to address this issue within your workplace policies?
- **Confidentiality Obligation**: Even if information is sent by mistake, employees generally have a duty to maintain confidentiality.
- **POPIA Compliance**: The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) requires the proper handling of personal information, including taking steps to rectify accidental disclosures.
- **Employer Policies**: Typically, workplace policies will outline the steps to take when such errors occur, including instructions to delete the information.
Staff members should still treat the information as confidential and not use it improperly.
Would you like more information on how to address this issue within your workplace policies?
What are the examples of using this information improperly?
Examples of improper use of mistakenly received confidential salary information under South African law include:
- **Sharing with Others**: Distributing the information to colleagues or external parties.
- **Using for Personal Gain**: Leveraging the information for salary negotiations or other personal benefits.
- **Posting Online**: Publishing the information on social media or other public platforms.
Would you like information on the legal consequences of such actions?
- **Sharing with Others**: Distributing the information to colleagues or external parties.
- **Using for Personal Gain**: Leveraging the information for salary negotiations or other personal benefits.
- **Posting Online**: Publishing the information on social media or other public platforms.
Would you like information on the legal consequences of such actions?
The information was used to hr asking ways for recourse
To address this issue with your HR, consider the following steps:
- **Report the Incident**: Inform HR about the receipt of confidential information and your concerns.
- **Follow Policies**: Request clarification on workplace policies regarding such incidents.
- **Seek Guidance**: Ask HR for specific instructions on how to handle the mistakenly received information.
Would you like more detailed advice on what to request from HR?
- **Report the Incident**: Inform HR about the receipt of confidential information and your concerns.
- **Follow Policies**: Request clarification on workplace policies regarding such incidents.
- **Seek Guidance**: Ask HR for specific instructions on how to handle the mistakenly received information.
Would you like more detailed advice on what to request from HR?
Why would the person who performed negligence not be disciplined?
It's possible that the person who performed the negligence is not disciplined due to several reasons, such as:
- **Lack of Clear Policy**: The organization might not have a clear policy regarding the handling of such mistakes.
- **Human Error**: The error might be considered an honest mistake without malicious intent.
- **Management Discretion**: The decision to discipline employees often lies with management and can depend on various factors like the employee's history and the context.
Would you like more information on how to advocate for stronger policies within your workplace?
- **Lack of Clear Policy**: The organization might not have a clear policy regarding the handling of such mistakes.
- **Human Error**: The error might be considered an honest mistake without malicious intent.
- **Management Discretion**: The decision to discipline employees often lies with management and can depend on various factors like the employee's history and the context.
Would you like more information on how to advocate for stronger policies within your workplace?
The person who received this information by mistake and approached HR about it has been disciplined and dismissed
I'm sorry to hear about the situation. To better assist you, could you please clarify if the dismissal was directly related to the handling of the mistakenly received confidential information? Additionally, could you mention your specific location in South Africa? This will help provide more precise legal information.
Yes, the dismissal was based on unauthorised possession of such information and unauthorised disclosure to the lawyer based on seeking legal advice
Thank you for the detailed information. In South Africa, unfair dismissal can be challenged under the Labour Relations Act (LRA). Here are some key points:
- **Unfair Dismissal**: Dismissal should be procedurally and substantively fair.
- **Right to Fair Hearing**: Employees have the right to a fair hearing before dismissal.
- **CCMA**: You can approach the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for dispute resolution.
Would you like more information on how to file a complaint with the CCMA?
- **Unfair Dismissal**: Dismissal should be procedurally and substantively fair.
- **Right to Fair Hearing**: Employees have the right to a fair hearing before dismissal.
- **CCMA**: You can approach the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for dispute resolution.
Would you like more information on how to file a complaint with the CCMA?
How does this justify disciplinary action and dismissal over an employee who was a recipient of such info when she used it to seek legal advice as she felt the information she became aware she was least paid and was pursuing the employer for recourse of the salaries discrepancies?
In South Africa, the justification for disciplinary action and dismissal in cases like this depends on several factors:
- **Confidentiality Obligation**: Unauthorized possession and disclosure of confidential information, even if received by mistake, can breach confidentiality obligations.
- **Workplace Policies**: If workplace policies explicitly prohibit such actions, violating them can warrant disciplinary action.
- **Unauthorized Disclosure**: Sharing confidential information with external parties, including lawyers, without proper authorization can be deemed improper use.
Would you like more information on how to challenge the dismissal through the CCMA?
- **Confidentiality Obligation**: Unauthorized possession and disclosure of confidential information, even if received by mistake, can breach confidentiality obligations.
- **Workplace Policies**: If workplace policies explicitly prohibit such actions, violating them can warrant disciplinary action.
- **Unauthorized Disclosure**: Sharing confidential information with external parties, including lawyers, without proper authorization can be deemed improper use.
Would you like more information on how to challenge the dismissal through the CCMA?
The company has no proof that i shared this information with a lawyer
Thank you for the detailed information. In South Africa, challenging an unfair dismissal can involve several steps:
- **Documentation**: Gather any evidence supporting your claim that you did not share the information with a lawyer.
- **CCMA**: File a complaint with the CCMA for unfair dismissal.
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA)~
Would you like guidance on how to prepare for your CCMA hearing?
- **Documentation**: Gather any evidence supporting your claim that you did not share the information with a lawyer.
- **CCMA**: File a complaint with the CCMA for unfair dismissal.
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA)~
Phone: * * *
Address: * Harrison St, Johannesburg, *, South Africa
Website: www.ccma.org.za
Would you like guidance on how to prepare for your CCMA hearing?
When the Commissioner at Ccma asks the employee rep to address him about the issue in his closing arguments, what does that imply?
The Commissioner at the CCMA (Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration) asking the employee representative to address him in the closing arguments implies that the representative needs to summarize their case, highlighting key points and arguments to persuade the Commissioner. This is an opportunity to reinforce the evidence presented and argue why the decision should favor the employee.
Where is your case being heard? Knowing the location can help provide specific details about the CCMA office and procedures.
Where is your case being heard? Knowing the location can help provide specific details about the CCMA office and procedures.
Is this still an open opportunity to persuade the commissioner? The employer argues the case of a dismissed employee who is seeking reinstatement. After her dismissal she was invited by the media to tell her side of the story. The media also gave the employer opportunity to tell their side. The employee argues that she was not in breach of any rule. The employer during cross examination also stated that there were no rules applicable to the employee. The employer is a public sector organization and not immune to scrutiny.
Could you please specify the location where your case is being heard? This will help provide more accurate information regarding the CCMA office and procedures.
South Africa in Johannesburg
Johannesburg CCMA Office
Phone: +* * * *
Address: * Harrison Street, Johannesburg, *
Website: www.ccma.org.za
Yes, closing arguments are a final opportunity to persuade the Commissioner. Summarize key points, highlight evidence, and argue why reinstatement is justified.
Could you share any specific concerns or points you want to emphasize in your closing arguments?
Senior managers who get dismissed their stories often make it to the media but would not comment. In my case I have expressed my views. They argue that this has been my disadvantage. I argue that the Constitution allows me to share my story when opportunity presents. It has public interest as something like this has never occurred before
In your closing arguments, you have the opportunity to emphasize several key points:
- **Constitutional Rights:** Highlight your right to freedom of expression under the South African Constitution.
- **Public Interest:** Argue that sharing your story serves the public interest, especially given the lack of precedent.
- **Employer Admission:** Stress that the employer admitted no rules were breached.
Would you like more information on how to structure these points effectively?
- **Constitutional Rights:** Highlight your right to freedom of expression under the South African Constitution.
- **Public Interest:** Argue that sharing your story serves the public interest, especially given the lack of precedent.
- **Employer Admission:** Stress that the employer admitted no rules were breached.
Would you like more information on how to structure these points effectively?
Yes please
To structure your closing arguments effectively, you can follow this outline:
*. **Introduction:**
- Briefly introduce yourself and the nature of your case.
- State your main argument for why the decision should favor reinstatement.
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Mention that this right is fundamental and protected by law.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Argue that sharing your story serves a significant public interest.
- Highlight the unprecedented nature of your case and its implications for public sector transparency and accountability.
*. **Employer Admission:**
- Point out that the employer admitted no rules were breached during cross-examination.
- Reinforce that there was no just cause for dismissal based on the employer’s own statement.
*. **Conclusion:**
- Summarize key points made.
- Reiterate why reinstatement is justified based on the evidence and arguments presented.
- Politely request the Commissioner to rule in your favor.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these points?
*. **Introduction:**
- Briefly introduce yourself and the nature of your case.
- State your main argument for why the decision should favor reinstatement.
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Mention that this right is fundamental and protected by law.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Argue that sharing your story serves a significant public interest.
- Highlight the unprecedented nature of your case and its implications for public sector transparency and accountability.
*. **Employer Admission:**
- Point out that the employer admitted no rules were breached during cross-examination.
- Reinforce that there was no just cause for dismissal based on the employer’s own statement.
*. **Conclusion:**
- Summarize key points made.
- Reiterate why reinstatement is justified based on the evidence and arguments presented.
- Politely request the Commissioner to rule in your favor.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these points?
The CFO who was dismissed for almost similar charges was reinstated after the ccma and labour court ruled. The employer was trying to put a point across to justify consistency. There is an employee which they dismissed successfully. I made a counter argument to say theres one who was reinstated and it is in the public domain. Even though this information came late, the Commissioner was able to accept it saying he needed a confirmation that proves reinstatement. I pulled out the annual report and parliament document signed by the CEO
Structuring Your Closing Arguments with Additional Points
Based on your situation, here's an enhanced outline for your closing arguments:
*. **Introduction:**
- Briefly introduce yourself and the nature of your case.
- State your main argument for why the decision should favor reinstatement.
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Mention that this right is fundamental and protected by law.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Argue that sharing your story serves a significant public interest.
- Highlight the unprecedented nature of your case and its implications for public sector transparency and accountability.
*. **Consistency in Employer's Actions:**
- Point out the reinstatement of the CFO with similar charges.
- Present the annual report and parliament document signed by the CEO as proof of the CFO’s reinstatement, demonstrating inconsistency in the employer’s actions.
*. **Employer Admission:**
- Point out that the employer admitted no rules were breached during cross-examination.
- Reinforce that there was no just cause for dismissal based on the employer’s own statement.
*. **Conclusion:**
- Summarize key points made.
Based on your situation, here's an enhanced outline for your closing arguments:
*. **Introduction:**
- Briefly introduce yourself and the nature of your case.
- State your main argument for why the decision should favor reinstatement.
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Mention that this right is fundamental and protected by law.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Argue that sharing your story serves a significant public interest.
- Highlight the unprecedented nature of your case and its implications for public sector transparency and accountability.
*. **Consistency in Employer's Actions:**
- Point out the reinstatement of the CFO with similar charges.
- Present the annual report and parliament document signed by the CEO as proof of the CFO’s reinstatement, demonstrating inconsistency in the employer’s actions.
*. **Employer Admission:**
- Point out that the employer admitted no rules were breached during cross-examination.
- Reinforce that there was no just cause for dismissal based on the employer’s own statement.
*. **Conclusion:**
- Summarize key points made.
During cross examination I was asked questions whether I considered the negative effect of the employer reputation after talking to the media? My response was to say I was sharing my side of the story. I was given opportunity to cry and I used it. It has nothing to do with employer reputation. Does this response sound appropriate?
Your response highlights your right to share your experience and focuses on your personal expression rather than the employer's reputation. This is appropriate. You may also want to reinforce that your actions were within your constitutional rights and served a public interest.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to strengthen this point?
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to strengthen this point?
Yes
Strengthening Your Response
To reinforce your argument during cross-examination, consider these points:
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Argue that this right includes sharing your personal story, especially when given the opportunity.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Explain that your statement was made in the public interest for transparency and accountability.
- Highlight that your case is unprecedented, making public awareness crucial.
*. **No Impact on Employer's Reputation:**
- Assert that your intention was not to harm the employer's reputation but to present your side.
- Mention that transparency and accountability in public sector employment are beneficial, not harmful.
To reinforce your argument during cross-examination, consider these points:
*. **Constitutional Rights:**
- Emphasize your right to freedom of expression under Section * of the South African Constitution.
- Argue that this right includes sharing your personal story, especially when given the opportunity.
*. **Public Interest:**
- Explain that your statement was made in the public interest for transparency and accountability.
- Highlight that your case is unprecedented, making public awareness crucial.
*. **No Impact on Employer's Reputation:**
- Assert that your intention was not to harm the employer's reputation but to present your side.
- Mention that transparency and accountability in public sector employment are beneficial, not harmful.
Example Response:
"While I understand the concern for the employer's reputation, my primary intention was to exercise my constitutional right to freedom of expression and to inform the public about my situation. This aligns with the principles of transparency and accountability, which are in the public interest."
Would you like additional help in articulating any other points?
"While I understand the concern for the employer's reputation, my primary intention was to exercise my constitutional right to freedom of expression and to inform the public about my situation. This aligns with the principles of transparency and accountability, which are in the public interest."
Would you like additional help in articulating any other points?
Start a new chat