Unlawful Eviction Legal Recourse

Summary

Plaintiffs lived in an RV for five years and faced unlawful eviction by their landlord, who obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) under false pretenses. They received only a 15-minute eviction notice, causing emotional distress and leaving them homeless. One plaintiff was physically harmed by the landlord, and they were denied essential services. The TRO was contested and dismissed. Legal recourse may be available for eviction, emotional trauma, and physical injuries.

Full Conversation

Plaintiff and fiancé lived in a RV for * yrs , landlord wanted them to remove RV and move not giving them any notice but * min from law enforcement because landlord illegally obtained a TRO and fabricating lies slandering plaintiffs and they had to leave without there animals causing severe emotional trauma to both plaintiffs leaving them homeless causing financial burden also while living at landlords one of the plaintiffs Teresa was accused of being in bathroom to long and landlord dragged her out injuring hip and wrist this was mid July * a incident report was filed also landlord denied them access to water garbage and bathroom / showers . Plaintiff rocky contested the TRO and the order was dismissed
It sounds like a complex and distressing situation you’re dealing with. Here are a few things to consider legally in Oregon:
- Tenants generally have rights to proper eviction notice.
- Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) require valid legal grounds.
- Physical harm or denial of essential services can be reported to authorities.
Would you like assistance connecting with local lawyers who can help with this case?
Draft a powerful summary for courts
Here's a concise summary for the court regarding the situation:
In this case, the plaintiffs, who resided in an RV for five years, faced unlawful eviction by their landlord, who obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) under false pretenses. The eviction notice was given with only a *-minute warning by law enforcement, causing severe emotional distress as the plaintiffs had to leave without their animals, leading to homelessness and financial hardship. Additionally, an incident occurred where one plaintiff, Teresa, was physically harmed by the landlord in July *. Further, the plaintiffs were denied essential services such as water, garbage, and bathroom facilities. The TRO was later contested and dismissed. The plaintiffs seek redress for the unlawful eviction, emotional trauma, and physical injuries sustained.