Summary
Tenant in a rent-controlled unit faces multiple issues including harassment, denial of visitor rights, and maintenance problems. California law protects tenant rights such as quiet enjoyment and habitability. Potential legal actions include breach of quiet enjoyment, violation of habitability standards, landlord harassment, and unlawful entry. Additionally, interference by a third party, such as a church, could be considered tortious interference. Proving intentional tortious interference requires establishing a valid contract, knowledge by the defendant, intentional acts to disrupt, actual disruption, and resulting damage. Consult a local tenant attorney for personalized advice.Full Conversation
Plaintiff is in a rent controlled unit for 11 years he's been denied for eight years his right to have visitors and lied to and had the owner should throw people out of the unit harassment losing mail turning off electricity is spotty if any maintenance causing medical problems violations of opening a door and lying about checking on somebody he should never have checked on him using a fraudulent document to try and steal the units from the plaintiff by asking for rent that wasn't due
It seems you're dealing with quite a few serious issues. California law protects tenant rights including quiet enjoyment, habitability, and against harassment. Here are some potential legal actions:
- Breach of quiet enjoyment
- Violation of habitability standards
- Landlord harassment
- Unlawful entry
Also, it may be illegal to deny your right to have visitors. Consider consulting with a local tenant attorney.
Also the aforementioned manager had dealings and private conversations with the plaintiffs church which she had no right and seeming to have collusion between the church and the defendant to get the plaintiff to release his apartment immediately the church due to their actions implied themselves as going to help this goal if not consciously but in spirit and evidence of clear and concise nature.
It seems like you're dealing with potential third-party interference as well. In California, interference with a contract or prospective economic advantage by a third party can be considered tortious interference. However, proving this could be challenging. It's best to consult with a lawyer to discuss these details further.
What is the proof required for tensional torturous interference
To prove intentional tortious interference in California, you generally need to establish:
- Existence of a valid contract or economic relationship.
- Knowledge of this relationship by the defendant.
- Intentional acts designed to disrupt this relationship.
- Actual disruption of the relationship.
- Resulting damage.
Please consult a lawyer for more detailed advice.
TRY ME!
Start a new chat