TRY ME!
Partnership Dissolution Legal Implications
Summary
Dissolving a general partnership like Eastside Physicians by distributing assets usually results in the termination of the firms legal existence. Corporate boards can delegate functions to officers, allowing them to manage daily operations. In New York, when a new partner is admitted, their liability for debts incurred before joining is limited to their capital contribution. Understanding these legal nuances is crucial for partners and corporate officers.Full Conversation
A board of directors can delegate some of its functions to corporate officers.
True
False
Yes, it's true that a board of directors can delegate some of its functions to corporate officers. This delegation allows officers to manage the day-to-day operations of a corporation while the board focuses on broader strategic issues.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about corporate governance or partnerships?
Is there anything else you'd like to know about corporate governance or partnerships?
When a party that is primarily liable on an instrument pays to a holder the amount due in full, all parties to the instrument are discharged.
True
False
When a party that is primarily liable on an instrument pays the amount due in full to a holder, all parties to the instrument are indeed discharged. So, the answer is "True."
If you have more questions about financial instruments or partnerships, feel free to ask!
If you have more questions about financial instruments or partnerships, feel free to ask!
Shrimp Boat Company decides to consolidate its operations with Trawlers, Inc., to form Unique Fishers Corporation (UFC).
Trawlers had rights in certain property. After the consolidation, UFC acquires the rights
automatically.
only after completing certain additional statutory procedures.
only if Trawlers' former shareholders expressly approve.
only if the acquisition is a specified result of the consolidation.
Case Rating: *
In a consolidation like the one between Shrimp Boat Company and Trawlers, Inc., the newly formed corporation, UFC, typically acquires the rights automatically as part of the consolidation process. However, this can depend on specific statutory procedures or agreements within the consolidation plan.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about corporate consolidations or mergers?
In a consolidation like the one between Shrimp Boat Company and Trawlers, Inc., the newly formed corporation, UFC, typically acquires the rights automatically as part of the consolidation process. However, this can depend on specific statutory procedures or agreements within the consolidation plan.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about corporate consolidations or mergers?
Eula signs a check "pay to the order of Eula" and presents to First National Bank for payment. The types of liability associated with this check are
fitness and quality.
potential and real.
sealed and delivered.
signature and warranty.
Case Rating: *
The types of liability associated with a check signed "pay to the order of Eula" and presented for payment are "signature and warranty." These liabilities relate to the responsibilities of the signer and the guarantees provided with the instrument.
If you have questions about financial liability or need more information, feel free to ask!
The types of liability associated with a check signed "pay to the order of Eula" and presented for payment are "signature and warranty." These liabilities relate to the responsibilities of the signer and the guarantees provided with the instrument.
If you have questions about financial liability or need more information, feel free to ask!
Financial Innovations, Inc., issues bonds, which are also known as
cumulative investments.
debt securities.
equity securities.
preferred stock.
Case Rating: *
Bonds issued by Financial Innovations, Inc. are known as "debt securities." Bonds are a form of borrowing where the issuer promises to pay back the borrowed amount with interest to the bondholders. If you have any other questions on financial instruments or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Bonds issued by Financial Innovations, Inc. are known as "debt securities." Bonds are a form of borrowing where the issuer promises to pay back the borrowed amount with interest to the bondholders. If you have any other questions on financial instruments or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
In winding up a partnership, partners can create new obligations on behalf of the partnership.
True
False
Case Rating: *
In winding up a partnership, the partners generally should not create new obligations on behalf of the partnership. The purpose of winding up is to settle and close the business, not to incur new liabilities. Therefore, the answer is "False."
If you have more questions about partnership dissolution or need clarification, feel free to ask!
In winding up a partnership, the partners generally should not create new obligations on behalf of the partnership. The purpose of winding up is to settle and close the business, not to incur new liabilities. Therefore, the answer is "False."
If you have more questions about partnership dissolution or need clarification, feel free to ask!
Todd indorses a check, "Pay to Interstate Trucking if they deliver the lumber by May *, *." This is
a blank indorsement.
a qualified indorsement.
a restrictive indorsement.
a special indorsement.
Case Rating: *
Todd's indorsement of the check, "Pay to Interstate Trucking if they deliver the lumber by May *, *," is a restrictive indorsement. This type of indorsement specifies a condition that must be met for the check to be negotiated further.
Do you have any other questions about financial instruments or endorsements?
Todd's indorsement of the check, "Pay to Interstate Trucking if they deliver the lumber by May *, *," is a restrictive indorsement. This type of indorsement specifies a condition that must be met for the check to be negotiated further.
Do you have any other questions about financial instruments or endorsements?
Parkdale Roofing Company receives a check from Quik Mart for fixing its roof, and indorses the check to Repair Supplies, Inc. (RSI). Stef, RSI's owner, gives the check to Tiny as a gift. In this situation, the party who is not an HDC of the check but who acquires HDC rights under the shelter principle is
no one.
Parkdale Roofing.
Stef.
Tiny.
Case Rating: *
In this situation, the party who is not a holder in due course (HDC) but who acquires HDC rights under the shelter principle is Tiny. The shelter principle allows a party to gain HDC rights if they receive the instrument from an HDC. Since Stef, RSI's owner, is not an HDC but gives the check to Tiny, Tiny acquires HDC rights under the shelter principle.
In this situation, the party who is not a holder in due course (HDC) but who acquires HDC rights under the shelter principle is Tiny. The shelter principle allows a party to gain HDC rights if they receive the instrument from an HDC. Since Stef, RSI's owner, is not an HDC but gives the check to Tiny, Tiny acquires HDC rights under the shelter principle.
Regional Investment Corporation (RIC) hires Sam, a real estate agent, to locate investment properties for RIC. Sam learns of a warehouse available for $*,*, buys it himself, and offers it to RIC for $*,*. Most likely, Sam
breached the agent's fiduciary duties to the principal.
did nothing wrong.
failed to take advantage of a business opportunity.
set an unreasonable price based on current market value.
Case Rating: *
Sam likely breached the agent's fiduciary duties to the principal. As an agent, Sam has a responsibility to act in the best interests of RIC. By purchasing the property himself and raising the price significantly, Sam may have violated these duties.
Do you have any specific questions about fiduciary duties or real estate agent responsibilities in New York?
Sam likely breached the agent's fiduciary duties to the principal. As an agent, Sam has a responsibility to act in the best interests of RIC. By purchasing the property himself and raising the price significantly, Sam may have violated these duties.
Do you have any specific questions about fiduciary duties or real estate agent responsibilities in New York?
Finest Office Company employs General Construction, Inc. (GCI), to renovate an office and signs a note for $*,* payable to GCI. GCI breaches the contract, but sells the note for $*,* to Happy Collection Agency, which knows that GCI has not performed. Happy is an HDC of the note in the amount of
$*.
$*,*.
$*,*.
$*,*.
Case Rating: *
Happy Collection Agency is not a holder in due course (HDC) because they knew of the breach when they acquired the note. Therefore, they cannot claim HDC rights and are subject to any defenses Finest Office Company has against GCI, meaning the amount is $*. If you have any questions regarding this, feel free to ask!
Happy Collection Agency is not a holder in due course (HDC) because they knew of the breach when they acquired the note. Therefore, they cannot claim HDC rights and are subject to any defenses Finest Office Company has against GCI, meaning the amount is $*. If you have any questions regarding this, feel free to ask!
Brad, Carlos, and Dora are general partners in Eastside Physicians, a medical clinic.
Brad, Carlos, and Dora decide to admit Faisal as a new partner in Eastside Physicians. Faisal's liability for partnership debts incurred before his admission is
limited to his capital contribution to the firm.
limited to his personal assets.
nothing.
unlimited.
Case Rating: *
In New York, when a new partner like Faisal is admitted to a general partnership such as Eastside Physicians, his liability for partnership debts incurred before his admission is typically limited to his capital contribution to the firm. This means he is not personally liable for debts incurred before joining the partnership.
If you have further questions or need clarification on partnerships, feel free to ask!
In New York, when a new partner like Faisal is admitted to a general partnership such as Eastside Physicians, his liability for partnership debts incurred before his admission is typically limited to his capital contribution to the firm. This means he is not personally liable for debts incurred before joining the partnership.
If you have further questions or need clarification on partnerships, feel free to ask!
Eagle Financial Corporation merges with First Bank Corporation, with Eagle Financial absorbing First Bank. After the merger
a different, new corporation is the surviving corporation.
Eagle Financial and First Bank are both surviving corporations.
Eagle Financial is the surviving corporation.
First Bank is the surviving corporation.
Case Rating: *
In the scenario you described, if Eagle Financial Corporation absorbs First Bank Corporation, Eagle Financial is the surviving corporation. If you have more questions about mergers or corporate law, feel free to ask!
In the scenario you described, if Eagle Financial Corporation absorbs First Bank Corporation, Eagle Financial is the surviving corporation. If you have more questions about mergers or corporate law, feel free to ask!
Trina and Uri do business as Value Gems. In acting on the firm's behalf in a deal with World Diamond Exchange, Trina recklessly exceeds what Value Gems can afford to pay, causing damage to the firm. Trina is
liable for breach of the duty of care.
liable for breach of the duty of economic sense.
liable for breach of the duty of loyalty.
not liable.
Case Rating: *
In this scenario, Trina is likely liable for the breach of the duty of care. A partner in a business has a duty to act with care and diligence in managing the firm's affairs. Recklessly exceeding what the firm can afford to pay can be seen as a breach of this duty, potentially leading to financial harm. If you have more questions about partnership duties or liabilities, feel free to ask!
In this scenario, Trina is likely liable for the breach of the duty of care. A partner in a business has a duty to act with care and diligence in managing the firm's affairs. Recklessly exceeding what the firm can afford to pay can be seen as a breach of this duty, potentially leading to financial harm. If you have more questions about partnership duties or liabilities, feel free to ask!
Caffeine Café, Inc., files its articles of incorporation with the appropriate government agency. Least likely to appear in the articles is the name of
each of the corporation's incorporators.
each of the corporation's shareholders.
the corporation.
the corporation's initial registered agent.
Case Rating: *
In the articles of incorporation for Caffeine Café, Inc., the least likely to appear is the name of each of the corporation's shareholders. Articles of incorporation typically include the corporation's name, incorporators, and initial registered agent.
If you have more questions about corporate filings or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
In the articles of incorporation for Caffeine Café, Inc., the least likely to appear is the name of each of the corporation's shareholders. Articles of incorporation typically include the corporation's name, incorporators, and initial registered agent.
If you have more questions about corporate filings or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Cal sells "DownSize," a weight-reduction program, from a Web site, in competition with Eat-Less Inc.'s product "Fit 'n Trim." Eat-Less files a suit against Cal, alleging in part that he is a sole proprietor, but his enterprise should be deemed a different form of business. Cal's enterprise should most likely be considered
a corporation because DownSize is sold online.
a franchisee because DownSize is sold in competition to Fit 'n Trim.
a sole proprietorship because Cal is a sole proprietor.
no form of business entity because Cal has no formal organization.
Case Rating: *
Based on the information provided, Cal's enterprise is most likely a sole proprietorship because he is a sole proprietor. A sole proprietorship is a business owned and operated by a single individual without formal organization into another business entity.
If you have more questions about business structures or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Based on the information provided, Cal's enterprise is most likely a sole proprietorship because he is a sole proprietor. A sole proprietorship is a business owned and operated by a single individual without formal organization into another business entity.
If you have more questions about business structures or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Jake is the maker of a $*,* promissory note payable to Kim. Kim indorses the note to Lou who, in turn, indorses it to Mona, who then indorses it to Nat, the present holder.
Nat properly presents the note to Jake for payment, but Jake dishonors it. With timely notice to the proper parties, Nat may collect payment on the note from
Kim, Lou, or Mona.
Kim or Lou only.
Mona only.
no one.
Case Rating: *
In this situation, Nat, as the holder of the dishonored promissory note, may collect payment from any of the endorsers: Kim, Lou, or Mona. Each of these endorsers has liability on the note unless they have a valid defense or the note was transferred without recourse. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
In this situation, Nat, as the holder of the dishonored promissory note, may collect payment from any of the endorsers: Kim, Lou, or Mona. Each of these endorsers has liability on the note unless they have a valid defense or the note was transferred without recourse. If you have further questions, feel free to ask!
Char's daughter Delsey dies before Char, leaving Delsey's son Egor. On Char's death, it is learned that Char's will gives "to my daughter Delsey my ranch in Mesquite County, Texas." Most likely, the gift of the ranch
abates.
does not fail.
lapses in full.
lapses in part.
Case Rating: *
In this scenario, the gift of the ranch to Delsey most likely lapses in full. In New York, when a beneficiary predeceases the testator, the gift lapses unless there is a residual clause or the anti-lapse statute applies, which might benefit a descendant like Egor.
In this scenario, the gift of the ranch to Delsey most likely lapses in full. In New York, when a beneficiary predeceases the testator, the gift lapses unless there is a residual clause or the anti-lapse statute applies, which might benefit a descendant like Egor.
Tyrone transfers a note by signing it and delivering it to Uri. Tyrone is
an indorser.
a notary.
a note passer.
a promisor.
Case Rating: *
In the scenario where Tyrone transfers a note by signing it and delivering it to Uri, Tyrone is considered an "indorser." An indorser is someone who signs a negotiable instrument to transfer it to another party. If you have more questions about negotiable instruments or endorsements, feel free to ask!
In the scenario where Tyrone transfers a note by signing it and delivering it to Uri, Tyrone is considered an "indorser." An indorser is someone who signs a negotiable instrument to transfer it to another party. If you have more questions about negotiable instruments or endorsements, feel free to ask!
Burt, a mentally impaired person, is asked by Carl to sign a piece of paper that Carl says is an autograph book. In fact, the document is a note. If later sued by an HDC, Burt's best defense would be
duress.
mistake.
fraud in the inducement.
fraud in the execution.
Case Rating: *
Burt's best defense against a holder in due course (HDC) would be "fraud in the execution." This defense applies when someone is deceived into signing a document without realizing its true nature. It argues that Burt was misled about the nature of the document he signed.
Do you have further questions about defenses against holders in due course or related legal matters?
Burt's best defense against a holder in due course (HDC) would be "fraud in the execution." This defense applies when someone is deceived into signing a document without realizing its true nature. It argues that Burt was misled about the nature of the document he signed.
Do you have further questions about defenses against holders in due course or related legal matters?
Dependable Appliances, Inc., is a private, for-profit corporation that (*) was formed for the purpose of manufacturing and distributing a newly patented kitchen appliance, (*) is owned by five shareholders, (*) is subject to double taxation, and (*) has made no public offering of its shares. Dependable is
an S corporation.
a close corporation.
a nonprofit corporation.
a professional corporation.
Case Rating: *
Dependable Appliances, Inc., is most likely a close corporation. It is privately held, has a limited number of shareholders, and is subject to double taxation, which aligns with the characteristics of a close corporation. If you have any more questions about corporate structures, feel free to ask!
Dependable Appliances, Inc., is most likely a close corporation. It is privately held, has a limited number of shareholders, and is subject to double taxation, which aligns with the characteristics of a close corporation. If you have any more questions about corporate structures, feel free to ask!
Diamond Construction Corporation claims to be a corporation, but it is not. Everett signs a contract with Diamond that it does not perform. Everett files a suit against Diamond. The court will likely hold that Diamond is
a corporation by estoppel.
a de facto corporation.
a de jure corporation.
an ultra vires corporation.
Case Rating: *
In this scenario, the court is likely to hold that Diamond Construction Corporation is a "corporation by estoppel." This means that even if Diamond is not a properly formed corporation, it may be prevented from denying its corporate status to avoid liability, especially if Everett relied on its representation as a corporation when signing the contract. If you have any questions about corporate law or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
In this scenario, the court is likely to hold that Diamond Construction Corporation is a "corporation by estoppel." This means that even if Diamond is not a properly formed corporation, it may be prevented from denying its corporate status to avoid liability, especially if Everett relied on its representation as a corporation when signing the contract. If you have any questions about corporate law or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Benny dies without a will, with no surviving spouse or child. Benny's survivors include his granddaughter Callie, his nephew Doug, and his cousin Earl. In most states, his estate would pass to
Callie.
Doug.
Earl.
the state.
Case Rating: *
In New York, when someone dies intestate (without a will) and has no surviving spouse or children, the estate typically passes to the closest descendants. Generally, the estate would pass to the granddaughter Callie if Benny has no other direct descendants like children. However, state laws can vary slightly, so consulting with a local attorney may provide more specific guidance.
Do you have more questions about this or need further information on inheritance laws in New York?
In New York, when someone dies intestate (without a will) and has no surviving spouse or children, the estate typically passes to the closest descendants. Generally, the estate would pass to the granddaughter Callie if Benny has no other direct descendants like children. However, state laws can vary slightly, so consulting with a local attorney may provide more specific guidance.
Do you have more questions about this or need further information on inheritance laws in New York?
Genetic Innovations, LP, is a limited partnership. The partners sign an agreement purporting to state how the firm's profits and losses are to be divided. The profits and losses of the firm will be divided
according to the agreement.
equally, despite the agreement.
in proportion to capital contributions, despite the agreement.
in proportion to each partner's participation in the firm's management, despite the agreement.
Case Rating: *
In a limited partnership like Genetic Innovations, LP, profits and losses are typically divided according to the partnership agreement. As long as the agreement is clear and all parties consent, it governs the division of financial outcomes. If you have further questions about limited partnerships or need clarification on specific terms, feel free to ask!
In a limited partnership like Genetic Innovations, LP, profits and losses are typically divided according to the partnership agreement. As long as the agreement is clear and all parties consent, it governs the division of financial outcomes. If you have further questions about limited partnerships or need clarification on specific terms, feel free to ask!
An indorsee cannot use the notation "without recourse" to avoid liability for payment on the instrument.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. An indorsee can use the notation "without recourse" to avoid liability for payment on the instrument. This type of endorsement limits the indorser's liability, meaning they are not responsible if the instrument is dishonored. If you have any related questions, feel free to ask!
False. An indorsee can use the notation "without recourse" to avoid liability for payment on the instrument. This type of endorsement limits the indorser's liability, meaning they are not responsible if the instrument is dishonored. If you have any related questions, feel free to ask!
Java Corporation wants to purchase all of the assets of Kaffee Corporation. Loni is a Kaffee shareholder. The approval of Loni and other Kaffee shareholders is necessary
in all circumstances.
in no circumstances.
only if Kaffee will be paid with unauthorized, unissued stock.
only if Java assumes Kaffee's liabilities as part of the deal.
Case Rating: *
In New York, shareholder approval is generally required for the sale of all or substantially all assets of a corporation, unless the corporation is continuing as a going concern and the sale does not significantly alter the nature of the business. Here, Loni and other Kaffee shareholders' approval is necessary if the sale constitutes a significant change, like assuming liabilities or using unauthorized stock. Would you like any more information on this topic or related issues?
In New York, shareholder approval is generally required for the sale of all or substantially all assets of a corporation, unless the corporation is continuing as a going concern and the sale does not significantly alter the nature of the business. Here, Loni and other Kaffee shareholders' approval is necessary if the sale constitutes a significant change, like assuming liabilities or using unauthorized stock. Would you like any more information on this topic or related issues?
Based on Bluto's conduct, Cass reasonably believes that Dee has the authority to act on Bluto's behalf even though Dee does not have the actual authority to do so. Cass makes a payment to Dee for Bluto. Dee keeps the money and disappears. Bluto
can demand that Cass make a repayment directly to Bluto.
can obtain damages from Cass for Dee's misconduct.
may be estopped from denying that Dee had authority.
must repudiate Dee's misconduct to avoid liability.
Case Rating: *
In this situation, Bluto may be estopped from denying that Dee had authority. If Cass reasonably believed that Dee had authority due to Bluto's conduct, Bluto might be prevented from denying that authority.
Would you like further clarification on agency law or related topics?
In this situation, Bluto may be estopped from denying that Dee had authority. If Cass reasonably believed that Dee had authority due to Bluto's conduct, Bluto might be prevented from denying that authority.
Would you like further clarification on agency law or related topics?
what does repudiate mean
Case Rating: *
"Repudiate" means to reject or refuse to accept something. In legal contexts, it often refers to a party denying the validity of a contract or agreement. If you have more questions about legal terms or issues, feel free to ask!
"Repudiate" means to reject or refuse to accept something. In legal contexts, it often refers to a party denying the validity of a contract or agreement. If you have more questions about legal terms or issues, feel free to ask!
Rafi, a director of Super Service Station Corporation, does not attend a board meeting for three years. During that time, Twyla, Super's president, makes improper loans that cost the company $*,*. Ron is most likely
liable for negligence or mismanagement.
liable for violation of the business judgment rule.
not liable because missing meetings is an honest mistake.
not liable because missing meetings is only poor judgmen
Case Rating: *
In this scenario, Rafi could potentially be liable for negligence or mismanagement due to his prolonged absence from board meetings, especially if his absence contributed to the improper loans made by Twyla. Directors have a duty to actively participate in governance to protect the corporation's interests.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about the responsibilities of directors or corporate governance in New York?
In this scenario, Rafi could potentially be liable for negligence or mismanagement due to his prolonged absence from board meetings, especially if his absence contributed to the improper loans made by Twyla. Directors have a duty to actively participate in governance to protect the corporation's interests.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about the responsibilities of directors or corporate governance in New York?
Worldwide Realtors, Inc., sells a franchise to XL Sales Company. XL is
a franchisee.
a franchisor.
an agent.
a principal.
Case Rating: *
In this case, XL Sales Company would be considered a "franchisee." A franchisee is an individual or entity that purchases the rights to operate a business under the franchisor's brand and system. If you have any other questions about franchises or related topics, feel free to ask!
In this case, XL Sales Company would be considered a "franchisee." A franchisee is an individual or entity that purchases the rights to operate a business under the franchisor's brand and system. If you have any other questions about franchises or related topics, feel free to ask!
Rhea is a director of Spex Corporation. As a Spex director, Rhea is
a trustee because Rhea occupies a position of trust over Spex.
a trustee who holds title to Spex's property for the benefit of others.
not a trustee because Rhea does not hold title to Spex's property.
not a trustee because Rhea is not in a position of trust over Spex.
Case Rating: *
In the context of corporate governance, a director like Rhea is not considered a trustee because she does not hold title to the corporation's property. Directors owe fiduciary duties, but they do not hold property in trust for others. If you're curious about fiduciary responsibilities or other corporate governance issues, feel free to ask!
In the context of corporate governance, a director like Rhea is not considered a trustee because she does not hold title to the corporation's property. Directors owe fiduciary duties, but they do not hold property in trust for others. If you're curious about fiduciary responsibilities or other corporate governance issues, feel free to ask!
One summer afternoon, Eve, Faruk, and Galen decide to each draft and sign a "Last Will and Testament." Eve is fifteen years old, Faruk is seventeen, and Galen is nineteen. In most states, those with the capacity to execute a will would be
Eve, Faruk, and Galen.
Faruk and Galen only.
Galen only.
not Eve, Faruk, or Galen.
Case Rating: *
In New York, the legal age to execute a will is typically 18 years old. Therefore, only Galen, who is nineteen, would generally have the capacity to execute a will. If you have more questions about wills or estate planning in New York, feel free to ask!
In New York, the legal age to execute a will is typically 18 years old. Therefore, only Galen, who is nineteen, would generally have the capacity to execute a will. If you have more questions about wills or estate planning in New York, feel free to ask!
Universal defenses defeat the claims of HDCs.
True
False
Case Rating: *
Universal defenses can indeed defeat the claims of holders in due course (HDCs). So, the answer is "True." Universal defenses, such as fraud in the execution, forgery, or illegality, can be used against an HDC. If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
Universal defenses can indeed defeat the claims of holders in due course (HDCs). So, the answer is "True." Universal defenses, such as fraud in the execution, forgery, or illegality, can be used against an HDC. If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!
On the back of a check payable to Nero, he writes "Pay to Odell, without recourse" and signs it. This
does not effect the check's negotiability or any party's liability.
relieves Nero of liability on the check.
relieves Odell of liability on the check.
renders the check nonnegotiable.
Case Rating: *
Writing "Pay to Odell, without recourse" and signing it on the back of a check typically:
- Relieves Nero of liability on the check.
This is a qualified endorsement, limiting Nero's liability if the check is dishonored. If you want more information on endorsements or negotiable instruments, let me know!
Writing "Pay to Odell, without recourse" and signing it on the back of a check typically:
- Relieves Nero of liability on the check.
This is a qualified endorsement, limiting Nero's liability if the check is dishonored. If you want more information on endorsements or negotiable instruments, let me know!
Biff signs a note "payable to the order of County Credit Union." Unless Biff has a valid defense against payment, Biff's liability on this note is
lateral.
primary.
secondary.
tertiary.
Case Rating: *
Biff's liability on the note is "primary." As the maker of the note, Biff has a primary obligation to pay the note when it is due, unless a valid defense exists. If you have any more questions about notes or financial liabilities, feel free to ask!
Biff's liability on the note is "primary." As the maker of the note, Biff has a primary obligation to pay the note when it is due, unless a valid defense exists. If you have any more questions about notes or financial liabilities, feel free to ask!
Adverse possession is a means of obtaining title to property without the delivery of a deed.
True
False
Case Rating: *
Yes, "Adverse possession is a means of obtaining title to property without the delivery of a deed" is true. In New York, acquiring property through adverse possession involves:
- Open and notorious use of the property
- Exclusive possession
- Hostile claim against the rights of the true owner
- Continuous possession for a statutory period (typically 10 years)
If you have more questions about adverse possession or need further details, feel free to ask!
Yes, "Adverse possession is a means of obtaining title to property without the delivery of a deed" is true. In New York, acquiring property through adverse possession involves:
- Open and notorious use of the property
- Exclusive possession
- Hostile claim against the rights of the true owner
- Continuous possession for a statutory period (typically 10 years)
If you have more questions about adverse possession or need further details, feel free to ask!
Kelly, the owner of Llama Farms, a sole proprietorship, wants to obtain additional business capital but to maintain control. This can best be accomplished by
borrowing funds.
bringing in partners.
issuing stock.
selling the business.
Case Rating: *
To maintain control while obtaining additional business capital, Kelly can best accomplish this by borrowing funds. This allows her to raise capital without giving up ownership or control, as would happen with bringing in partners or issuing stock. If you have more questions about business financing or need further information, feel free to ask!
To maintain control while obtaining additional business capital, Kelly can best accomplish this by borrowing funds. This allows her to raise capital without giving up ownership or control, as would happen with bringing in partners or issuing stock. If you have more questions about business financing or need further information, feel free to ask!
Mall Stores Corporation owns * percent of the shares of Niche Retail Corporation. Through a certain transaction, Mall Stores combines with Niche Retail, but only Mall Stores continues to exist. This is
a consolidation.
a share exchange.
a short-form merger.
a termination.
Case Rating: *
In the scenario you described, when Mall Stores Corporation owns * percent of the shares of Niche Retail Corporation and combines with it, with only Mall Stores continuing to exist, this is considered a "short-form merger." A short-form merger allows a parent company that owns at least *% of a subsidiary to merge with it without the need for the approval of the subsidiary's shareholders.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
In the scenario you described, when Mall Stores Corporation owns * percent of the shares of Niche Retail Corporation and combines with it, with only Mall Stores continuing to exist, this is considered a "short-form merger." A short-form merger allows a parent company that owns at least *% of a subsidiary to merge with it without the need for the approval of the subsidiary's shareholders.
If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Most states permit a nuncupative will if it is made before witnesses.
True
False
Case Rating: *
False. In New York, nuncupative wills, which are oral wills made before witnesses, are generally not valid for the disposition of real property or large estates. They are typically not recognized except under very limited circumstances, such as for military personnel in active duty. If you have more questions about wills or estate planning, feel free to ask!
False. In New York, nuncupative wills, which are oral wills made before witnesses, are generally not valid for the disposition of real property or large estates. They are typically not recognized except under very limited circumstances, such as for military personnel in active duty. If you have more questions about wills or estate planning, feel free to ask!
Start a new chat