Police Report Discrepancies Identified

Dealing with the unprofessional behavior of police officers actions and response to a critical situation

Discrepancies in the Police Report Location of Impact: The police report contains conflicting details about the location of the impact. Accurate documentation is crucial for determining liability and understanding the circumstances surrounding the accident. Driver's License Status: The report fails to clarify the driver's license status at the time of the collision. If the driver was unlicensed or had a suspended license, this could have legal repercussions. Insurance Validity: The driver's insurance was reported as invalid at the time of the crash. The act of knowingly presenting an invalid insurance card raises questions of potential fraud and liability. Field Sobriety Test: There is no record of a field sobriety test being administered to the driver. Given the circumstances surrounding the collision, this oversight is critical, as it may have implications for determining whether the driver was impaired at the time of the incident. Citation Inquiry: Officer I. Yum was questioned by an on-scene supervisor regarding the issuance of citations to the driver. The absence of any citations in the report raises concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation. IV. Legal Issues and Applicable Laws

Hawaii revised Statutes

investigation conducted by the Kauai Police Department concerning the motor vehicle collision that occurred on June *, *, at approximately *:* PM in front of Kukaua’s home residence on Mahuahua Rd. This incident involved a six-year-old boy, Kukaua Pa, who sustained critical injuries, including a fractured skull and brain bleeding. Upon reviewing the details surrounding this case, I have identified several significant discrepancies in the police report, as well as concerns regarding the officers' conduct and adherence to applicable traffic laws. It is with a grave sense of urgency that I outline the following issues: Investigation Oversight: The body-worn camera footage and security camera recordings provide substantial evidence that critical details may have been dismissed or inadequately documented at the scene. This neglect raises serious questions about the integrity of the investigation. Driver's License Status: The police report fails to address the driver's license status at the time of the collision. Should it be determined that Driver Tehani Kuhaulua was unlicensed or operating with a suspended license, there are potential legal ramifications that cannot be ignored. Insurance Validity: An alarming aspect of this incident is that the driver's insurance was reported as invalid at the time of the crash. If it is proven that an invalid insurance card was knowingly presented, this could indicate potential fraud and raises further liability concerns. Field Sobriety Test: There is an absence of any record indicating that a field sobriety test was administered to the driver. Given the circumstances leading up to the collision, this oversight is critical and could play a significant role in determining whether the driver was impaired during the incident. Citation Inquiry: Reports indicate that Officer I. Yum was questioned by a supervisor regarding the issuance of citations. The vehicle involved, a Chevy Tahoe (Lic. #KKKC), exhibited multiple violations, including expired registration, expired safety check, and illegal tinted windows. The lack of citations documented in the report calls into question the thoroughness of the police response. Professional Conduct: The demeanor displayed by officers at the scene was unprofessional. Their chuckling and dismissive behavior in the face of such serious injuries, especially in critical situations, is unacceptable. Officers are expected to conduct themselves with professionalism and seriousness, particularly when dealing with injuries to vulnerable individuals. These aforementioned issues cast doubt on the adequacy of the police investigation, contributing to broader concerns surrounding public safety, accountability, and liability.

With hawaii revised stautes what does the driver violate,

Protocols for officers responding

What if an officer didn’t suspect impairment for driver is it still mandatory

But the driver has several Violations and was not arrested or charged or even given a citation