Landlord Breach Of Covenants

Kemi has taken a lease for three years of a flat on the third floor of a block that was built in the 1970s. The block was built to the building standards of the time, and the walls easily transmit noise. Kemi finds that she hears every noise that her neighbours make. Furthermore, the external pathway leading to the block of flats has fallen into disrepair. Several of the paving slabs are uneven, and Kemi has tripped and injured herself. Is the landlord in breach of the implied covenant for quiet enjoyment and / or the statutory covenant to repair the property?

Is the landlord in breach of the implied covenant for quiet enjoyment and / or the statutory covenant to repair the property? They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property.

which answer

Is the landlord in breach of the implied covenant for quiet enjoyment and / or the statutory covenant to repair the property? They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property.

Is the landlord in breach of the implied covenant for quiet enjoyment and / or the statutory covenant to repair the property? They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. They are in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment due to the noise levels in the flat. They are in breach of the statutory repairing obligations as there is damage to the exterior of the property. There is no breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment as the noise is a result of the structure of the block of flats. There is no breach of the statutory repairing obligations as the damaged pathway is outside the property.

which one answr out of the *

For 15 years, Chad accessed his garage by using a driveway belonging to his neighbour, Fatima. Fatima never expressly gave Chad permission to do this, but she never objected to his use of the driveway. Last year, Fatima sold her house, and the new owner has told Chad to stop using the driveway. Chad wants to know if he has any legal right to continue using the driveway. Which statement best describes Chad’s position? His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim an equitable easement acquired by prescription. His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim a legal easement acquired by prescription. He has no easement because his use of the driveway has not continued for more than twenty years. He has no easement because there was no agreement between him and Fatima.

Which statement best describes Chad’s position? His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim an equitable easement acquired by prescription. His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim a legal easement acquired by prescription. He has no easement because his use of the driveway has not continued for more than twenty years. He has no easement because there was no agreement between him and Fatima.

Which statement best describes Chad’s position? His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim an equitable easement acquired by prescription. His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim a legal easement acquired by prescription. He has no easement because his use of the driveway has not continued for more than twenty years. He has no easement because there was no agreement between him and Fatima. which answer out of the *

Which statement best describes Chad’s position? His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim an equitable easement acquired by prescription. His use of the driveway has continued for more than twelve years, so he can claim a legal easement acquired by prescription. He has no easement because his use of the driveway has not continued for more than twenty years. He has no easement because there was no agreement between him and Fatima. which answer is most correct

Kayla inspected a house prior to purchasing it. During her inspection, she met a man who she knew not to be the registered owner. The man appeared to be living in the house, so Kayla asked him whether he had any rights in relation to the house. The man explained that he was the brother of the registered owner, was only lodging in the house for a couple of weeks, and would leave before the sale completed. Kayla went ahead with the purchase and has now been registered as the house’s new proprietor. However, Kayla has now discovered that the man is still living in the house and is claiming that he has a contract to buy the house which is binding on her. The title register of the house does not contain any entry for this contract. Is Kayla bound by the man’s interest in the house?

Is Kayla bound by the man’s interest in the house? No, because he failed to disclose his interest in the house when asked. Yes, because he was in actual occupation at the time of the sale, and the occupation was obvious on a reasonably careful inspection of the house. Yes, because Kayla had actual knowledge of his occupation of the house. No, because his contract was not noted on the title register of the house.

Muhammad, a landscape gardener, has recently improved his own garden by building a patio which he cemented into place. In the corner of the patio is a substantial brick-built pizza oven, which is loosely fitted to the patio to provide stability. The pizza oven can be disassembled and re-assembled if necessary. Elsewhere on the patio are several large, ornamental plant containers. Each of these is of a different design, and has a specific location within the design of the patio, although they rest on their own weight and are not fixed in any way. Which statement best describes the status of the pizza oven and ornamental plant containers?

Which statement best describes the status of the pizza oven and ornamental plant containers? The pizza oven is probably a chattel as it can be removed without destruction. The ornamental plant containers are probably chattels as they are resting on their own weight. The pizza oven is probably a fixture as it is brick-built and has been attached to the patio. The ornamental plant containers are probably chattels as they are resting on their own weight. The pizza oven is probably a chattel as it can be removed without destruction. The ornamental plant containers are probably fixtures as they are part of the architectural design of the patio. The pizza oven is probably a fixture as it is brick-built and has been attached to the patio. The ornamental plant containers are probably fixtures as they are part of the architectural design of the patio.

Henry owns the freehold estate in a house, purchased with the assistance of mortgage finance from a bank five years ago. The mortgage granted to the bank was created by deed and is registered with the Land Registry. Henry has suffered financial difficulties and has only paid part of the last three mortgage payments. The mortgage has another twenty years left to run and Henry wants to know whether the bank can sell the house. Which statement best describes whether the bank can exercise its power of sale? The bank cannot sell the house because Henry has only been in arrears for three months. The bank can sell the house, but it must first give Henry three months’ notice to enable him to try to repay the arrears. The bank cannot sell the house because it is likely that Henry will be able to repay the arrears over the remainder of the mortgage term. The bank can sell the house and has no obligation to serve any notice on Henry.