Property Transfer Legal Principle

Summary

The principle nemo dat quod non habet means one cannot transfer a better title than they possess. If a non-owner attempts to transfer property, the transfer is generally invalid. For specific Supreme Court judgments, refer to Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana (2011) and State of Andhra Pradesh vs Star Bone Mill and Fertiliser Company (2013).

Full Conversation

A transfer made by a person not owner of the property doesn't confer any right over the said property
This situation usually involves the principle of "nemo dat quod non habet," meaning one cannot transfer a better title than they possess. If you're dealing with a specific issue or need further assistance, please let me know if there are any specific details or questions you have about this principle or related legal matters.
Also provide me.with the supreme court judgment
It sounds like you're looking for information on the legal principle "nemo dat quod non habet," and a specific Supreme Court judgment related to property transfer by a non-owner.
Unfortunately, I can't provide the exact Supreme Court judgment text, but here are general points on this principle:
- Nemo dat quod non habet: One cannot transfer a better title than they possess.
- Legal Implication: If a person who is not the owner of the property tries to transfer it, the transfer is generally invalid.
For specific judgments, you may refer to:
- "Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Haryana" (*)
- "State of Andhra Pradesh vs Star Bone Mill and Fertiliser Company" (*)
Do you need more help with understanding the principle, or do you have another specific question?