Plot Exchange Legal Resolution

Summary

The case involves a petitioner challenging UPSIDAs decision regarding a plot exchange due to its unfavorable position. The court directed UPSIDA to refund the deposit with 8% interest and allowed the petitioner to apply for a better-positioned plot. The decision seems fair, offering compensation and improvement opportunities. However, it can be challenged in the Supreme Court through a Special Leave Petition (SLP) if substantial legal grounds exist. Consulting a legal expert is advisable to evaluate the merits for an SLP.

Full Conversation

What he got in return?
Rajaram Maurya was directed by the court to receive a refund of his entire deposit with *% interest per month from UPSIDA, payable from the date of deposit until the refund date. Additionally, he has the option to apply for a better-positioned plot, with preferential treatment in the allotment process.
Is this decision wrong?
The court's decision appears to be a fair resolution given the circumstances. The petitioner, Rajaram Maurya, was offered a refund with interest due to the undisclosed unfavorable position of his plot, and an opportunity to apply for a better plot. This compensates for the oversight in the original allotment and provides a chance for improvement.
Can it be challenged in supreme court in slp?
Case Rating: *
The decision made by the High Court can potentially be challenged in the Supreme Court through a Special Leave Petition (SLP) if there are substantial grounds or legal points that warrant further consideration. However, it's important to consult with a legal expert who can evaluate the merits of the case and determine whether there are sufficient grounds for an SLP.
Would you like more information on the process or grounds for filing an SLP?