Property Interests In Green Gables
Summary
Annie and Ben, as registered proprietors, hold the legal freehold title to Green Gables. Cath and Dai, having contributed significantly to the purchase, likely hold equitable interests. This scenario suggests a tenancy in common, where shares are based on contributions, not equal, and without the right of survivorship. Relevant legal principles include resulting trusts and cases like Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which guide share allocation based on contributions and intentions. The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 governs the management of these interests. Middle Bank plcs mortgage interest may be subject to Cath and Dais interests if they have an overriding interest through actual occupation, as per the Land Registration Act 2002 and cases like Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487.Full Conversation
Identify the type of property estate and/or interests that Cath, Dai, Annie and Ben have
in Green Gables when the purchase of the property is registered at HM land Registry,
and the manner in which they hold those interests. Give reasons for your answer
supported by case law and relevant statutory sections
Since Annie and Ben are the registered proprietors of Green Gables, they hold the legal freehold. The contributions and intentions of the parties suggest a resulting trust in favor of the contributors. Here’s the likely breakdown:
- Annie and Ben:
- Legal owners of the freehold title.
- Holding the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai in proportion to their contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions determine shares.
- Cath and Dai:
- Beneficial owners due to their significant contributions (£*,* each).
- Likely hold equitable interests in the property.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act * will govern how these interests are held and managed.
Given these details, were there any specific agreements on how the shares are to be divided?
- Annie and Ben:
- Legal owners of the freehold title.
- Holding the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai in proportion to their contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions determine shares.
- Cath and Dai:
- Beneficial owners due to their significant contributions (£*,* each).
- Likely hold equitable interests in the property.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act * will govern how these interests are held and managed.
Given these details, were there any specific agreements on how the shares are to be divided?
Identify the type of property estate and/or interests that Cath, Dai, Annie and Ben have
in Green Gables when the purchase of the property is registered at HM land Registry,
and the manner in which they hold those interests. Give reasons for your answer
supported by case law and relevant statutory sections
Here's the breakdown of interests in Green Gables:
- Annie and Ben:
- *Legal owners*: Registered proprietors of the freehold title.
- *Equitable interests*: Hold the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai, reflecting their contributions.
- Cath and Dai:
- *Beneficial owners*: Due to their substantial contributions (£*,* each), they likely hold significant equitable interests.
Legal Framework:
- Resulting Trust: Based on contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions guide share allocation.
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs the holding and management of these interests.
To further clarify, were there any explicit agreements about the shares?
- Annie and Ben:
- *Legal owners*: Registered proprietors of the freehold title.
- *Equitable interests*: Hold the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai, reflecting their contributions.
- Cath and Dai:
- *Beneficial owners*: Due to their substantial contributions (£*,* each), they likely hold significant equitable interests.
Legal Framework:
- Resulting Trust: Based on contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions guide share allocation.
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs the holding and management of these interests.
To further clarify, were there any explicit agreements about the shares?
****
Here’s the breakdown of interests in Green Gables:
- Annie and Ben:
- *Legal owners*: Registered proprietors of the freehold title.
- *Equitable interests*: Holding the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai, reflecting their contributions.
- Cath and Dai:
- *Beneficial owners*: Due to their substantial contributions (£*,* each), they likely hold significant equitable interests.
Legal Framework:
- Resulting Trust: Based on contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions guide share allocation.
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs holding and management of interests.
Were there specific agreements on how shares are divided?
- Annie and Ben:
- *Legal owners*: Registered proprietors of the freehold title.
- *Equitable interests*: Holding the property on trust for themselves and Cath and Dai, reflecting their contributions.
- Cath and Dai:
- *Beneficial owners*: Due to their substantial contributions (£*,* each), they likely hold significant equitable interests.
Legal Framework:
- Resulting Trust: Based on contributions.
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Contributions and intentions guide share allocation.
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs holding and management of interests.
Were there specific agreements on how shares are divided?
is this joint tennancy or tennancy in common
Given the contributions and the likely intention of the parties, this scenario suggests a tenancy in common arrangement.
- Joint Tenancy: Equal shares, right of survivorship.
- Tenancy in Common: Unequal shares, no right of survivorship, shares based on contribution.
Do you have any written agreement detailing the shares?
- Joint Tenancy: Equal shares, right of survivorship.
- Tenancy in Common: Unequal shares, no right of survivorship, shares based on contribution.
Do you have any written agreement detailing the shares?
which applies to scenario
Given the scenario, the arrangement is likely a tenancy in common.
- Joint Tenancy: Equal shares, right of survivorship.
- Tenancy in Common: Unequal shares, no right of survivorship, shares based on contribution.
Specific contributions and intentions point towards a tenancy in common.
Do you have any written agreement detailing the shares?
- Joint Tenancy: Equal shares, right of survivorship.
- Tenancy in Common: Unequal shares, no right of survivorship, shares based on contribution.
Specific contributions and intentions point towards a tenancy in common.
Do you have any written agreement detailing the shares?
is there both legal and equitable interests
Yes, both legal and equitable interests exist in this scenario:
- Annie and Ben: Legal owners of the freehold title, holding the property on trust.
- Cath and Dai: Equitable (beneficial) owners due to their significant contributions.
Would you like more details on how these interests are managed?
- Annie and Ben: Legal owners of the freehold title, holding the property on trust.
- Cath and Dai: Equitable (beneficial) owners due to their significant contributions.
Would you like more details on how these interests are managed?
cases and statutes appropriate\
Here are some relevant cases and statutes:
- Cases:
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Establishes that the shares of parties are determined based on their contributions and intentions.
- Jones v Kernott [*] UKSC *: Similar principles as Stack v Dowden but further clarifies the intentions of the parties involved.
- Statutes:
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs the holding and management of property interests.
- Law of Property Act *: Governs legal and equitable interests in property.
Would you like to dive deeper into any of these cases or statutes?
- Cases:
- Stack v Dowden [*] UKHL *: Establishes that the shares of parties are determined based on their contributions and intentions.
- Jones v Kernott [*] UKSC *: Similar principles as Stack v Dowden but further clarifies the intentions of the parties involved.
- Statutes:
- Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act *: Governs the holding and management of property interests.
- Law of Property Act *: Governs legal and equitable interests in property.
Would you like to dive deeper into any of these cases or statutes?
Is Middle Bank plc legally bound by, and their mortgage interest subject to, the property
interests of Cath and Dai in Green Gables? Identify the priority position between
Middle bank plc and Cath and Dai by reference to case law and the relevant sections
of the Land Registration Act *.
To determine the priority position between Middle Bank plc and Cath and Dai, we need to consider the Land Registration Act *:
- Section *: A registered charge (the mortgage) will take priority over any unregistered interest unless that interest is protected by a notice or falls within the category of overriding interests.
- Schedule *, Paragraph *: Overriding interests include the actual occupation of the property by Cath and Dai, which may protect their interests.
Relevant Cases:
- Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [*] AC *: Establishes that actual occupation can give rise to an overriding interest.
- Abbey National Building Society v Cann [*] * AC *: Clarifies the timing of actual occupation.
Would you like more details on how these laws apply to your specific situation?
- Section *: A registered charge (the mortgage) will take priority over any unregistered interest unless that interest is protected by a notice or falls within the category of overriding interests.
- Schedule *, Paragraph *: Overriding interests include the actual occupation of the property by Cath and Dai, which may protect their interests.
Relevant Cases:
- Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [*] AC *: Establishes that actual occupation can give rise to an overriding interest.
- Abbey National Building Society v Cann [*] * AC *: Clarifies the timing of actual occupation.
Would you like more details on how these laws apply to your specific situation?
apply abbey to the case
Abbey National Building Society v Cann [*] * AC * clarifies the timing of actual occupation. It indicates that for Cath and Dai's interests to override Middle Bank plc's mortgage, their occupation must have been established at the exact moment the legal title was transferred. If their occupation began after the completion of the mortgage, their interests would not override the bank's charge.
Would you like more details on how this affects Cath and Dai's position?
Would you like more details on how this affects Cath and Dai's position?
Cath dies having made a will leaving all her interest in Green Gables to her daughter
Ezzie. Explain what effect (if any) this has on the ownership of Green Gables both at
law and in equity. Give reasons for your answer supported by case law and relevant
sections of the Law of Property Act *. [* marks
When Cath dies and leaves her interest in Green Gables to Ezzie in her will, the following legal and equitable effects occur:
- Legal Interest: Annie and Ben remain the legal owners of the property.
- Equitable Interest: Ezzie inherits Cath's equitable interest in Green Gables.
Relevant Law:
- Law of Property Act *:
- Section *: Defines legal estates and interests.
- Section *(*)(b): Requires written evidence for the transfer of equitable interests.
Relevant Case:
- Vandervell v IRC [*] * AC *: Confirms the need for written evidence in transferring equitable interests.
Would you like more details on how Ezzie can manage her new interest in the property?
- Legal Interest: Annie and Ben remain the legal owners of the property.
- Equitable Interest: Ezzie inherits Cath's equitable interest in Green Gables.
Relevant Law:
- Law of Property Act *:
- Section *: Defines legal estates and interests.
- Section *(*)(b): Requires written evidence for the transfer of equitable interests.
Relevant Case:
- Vandervell v IRC [*] * AC *: Confirms the need for written evidence in transferring equitable interests.
Would you like more details on how Ezzie can manage her new interest in the property?