TRY ME!
Document Request For Foreclosure
Summary
In Massachusetts, a warehouser must present specific documents to legally perform evictions. These include a valid warehousing license, insurance certificates, business registration, and eviction authorization. The documents should detail the storage facilitys address and include effective coverage dates. Additionally, all documents related to the warehousing and storage of possessions, including contracts and communications, should be provided. Failure to respond within 30 days may lead to legal action. If the warehouser claims an unauthorized storage location, request documentation confirming the licensed address. Ensure they have the authority to handle sensitive items like federal passports.Full Conversation
I am about to submit a discovery requests for documents as a part of my housing court foreclosure case concerning the illegal acts of an unlicensed warehouser In Massachusetts. Please enhance the following, the first of three parts; NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days.
In Massachusetts, a warehouser would need to present the following documents to be considered a legal entity for performing a legal eviction for possession; thus, I am requesting the following along with the effective coverage dates:
Sure, here's an enhanced version of the document request for your housing court foreclosure case:
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days.
In Massachusetts, a warehouser must present the following documents to be considered a legal entity capable of performing a legal eviction for possession. Therefore, I am requesting the following documents along with their effective coverage dates:
*. License to Operate as a Warehouser:
- Proof of a valid warehousing license issued by the appropriate Massachusetts regulatory authority.
- Effective coverage dates of the license.
*. Insurance Certificates:
- Current insurance certificates covering liability and property damage.
- Effective coverage dates of the insurance policies.
*. Business Registration Documents:
- Proof of business registration with the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth.
- Effective coverage dates of the registration.
*. Eviction Authorization:
- Documentation authorizing the warehouser to conduct evictions on behalf of the landlord or property owner.
- Effective dates of the authorization.
---
If you need further assistance or have more documents to request, feel free to ask!
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days.
In Massachusetts, a warehouser must present the following documents to be considered a legal entity capable of performing a legal eviction for possession. Therefore, I am requesting the following documents along with their effective coverage dates:
*. License to Operate as a Warehouser:
- Proof of a valid warehousing license issued by the appropriate Massachusetts regulatory authority.
- Effective coverage dates of the license.
*. Insurance Certificates:
- Current insurance certificates covering liability and property damage.
- Effective coverage dates of the insurance policies.
*. Business Registration Documents:
- Proof of business registration with the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth.
- Effective coverage dates of the registration.
*. Eviction Authorization:
- Documentation authorizing the warehouser to conduct evictions on behalf of the landlord or property owner.
- Effective dates of the authorization.
---
If you need further assistance or have more documents to request, feel free to ask!
please enhance; These documents should include the precise address of the facility being used for storage. Specifically:
- The written lease agreements or contracts should detail the storage location.
- The business license may list the operating address.
- Insurance policies typically include the facility address.
The documents should include the coverage valid dates to ensure they are current and valid at the time of the eviction and storage. This is important for verifying the legitimacy and compliance of the warehouser's operations.
I am also requesting the following accompanied by the dates of implementation related to the seizure of my property:
-All documents related to the warehousing and storage of the Plaintiff's possessions including contracts, all emails and mailings.
Sure, here's an enhanced version of your document request:
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days.
In Massachusetts, a warehouser must present the following documents to be considered a legal entity capable of performing a legal eviction for possession. Therefore, I am requesting the following documents along with their effective coverage dates:
*. License to Operate as a Warehouser:
- Proof of a valid warehousing license issued by the appropriate Massachusetts regulatory authority, including the effective coverage dates of the license.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Insurance Certificates:
- Current insurance certificates covering liability and property damage, including the effective coverage dates of the insurance policies.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Business Registration Documents:
- Proof of business registration with the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, including the effective coverage dates of the registration.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Eviction Authorization:
- Documentation authorizing the warehouser to conduct evictions on behalf of the landlord or property owner, including the effective dates of the authorization.
Additionally, I am requesting the following documents related to the warehousing and storage of the Plaintiff's possessions, accompanied by the dates of implementation related to the seizure of my property:
- All written lease agreements or contracts detailing the storage location.
- All business licenses listing the operating address.
- All insurance policies including the facility address.
- All documents including contracts, emails, and mailings.
---
If you need further assistance or have more documents to request, feel free to ask!
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days.
In Massachusetts, a warehouser must present the following documents to be considered a legal entity capable of performing a legal eviction for possession. Therefore, I am requesting the following documents along with their effective coverage dates:
*. License to Operate as a Warehouser:
- Proof of a valid warehousing license issued by the appropriate Massachusetts regulatory authority, including the effective coverage dates of the license.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Insurance Certificates:
- Current insurance certificates covering liability and property damage, including the effective coverage dates of the insurance policies.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Business Registration Documents:
- Proof of business registration with the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, including the effective coverage dates of the registration.
- The precise address of the facility being used for storage.
*. Eviction Authorization:
- Documentation authorizing the warehouser to conduct evictions on behalf of the landlord or property owner, including the effective dates of the authorization.
Additionally, I am requesting the following documents related to the warehousing and storage of the Plaintiff's possessions, accompanied by the dates of implementation related to the seizure of my property:
- All written lease agreements or contracts detailing the storage location.
- All business licenses listing the operating address.
- All insurance policies including the facility address.
- All documents including contracts, emails, and mailings.
---
If you need further assistance or have more documents to request, feel free to ask!
enhance; -Copies of any licenses or permits held by the Defendant for warehousing services.
-All insurance policies covering the Defendant's warehousing operations.
-The address and details of the storage facility used for the Plaintiff's possessions.
-Any contracts or agreements, written or oral, related to the warehousing of the --Plaintiff's possessions.
-Documentation of bonding for the warehousing services provided.
-All documents identifying the party that hired the warehouser.
-Copies of all documents presented to the employer by the warehouser.
-All written and oral agreements with the Bank of New York Mellon.
-All written and oral agreements with the Sheriff's Department of Hampden County.
Failure to respond to this request within 30 days may result in a motion to compel and further legal action.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here’s an enhanced version of your document request:
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days:
- Copies of any licenses or permits held by the Defendant for warehousing services.
- All insurance policies covering the Defendant's warehousing operations.
- The precise address and details of the storage facility used for the Plaintiff's possessions.
- Any contracts or agreements, written or oral, related to the warehousing of the Plaintiff's possessions.
- Documentation of bonding for the warehousing services provided.
- All documents identifying the party that hired the warehouser.
- Copies of all documents presented to the employer by the warehouser.
- All written and oral agreements with the Bank of New York Mellon.
- All written and oral agreements with the Sheriff's Department of Hampden County.
Failure to respond to this request within 30 days may result in a motion to compel and further legal action.
---
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Sure, here’s an enhanced version of your document request:
---
NOW COMES ALTON KING JR., Plaintiff, to request that Defendant, RACE STREET PROPERTIES, LLC, provide the following documents and information within 30 days:
- Copies of any licenses or permits held by the Defendant for warehousing services.
- All insurance policies covering the Defendant's warehousing operations.
- The precise address and details of the storage facility used for the Plaintiff's possessions.
- Any contracts or agreements, written or oral, related to the warehousing of the Plaintiff's possessions.
- Documentation of bonding for the warehousing services provided.
- All documents identifying the party that hired the warehouser.
- Copies of all documents presented to the employer by the warehouser.
- All written and oral agreements with the Bank of New York Mellon.
- All written and oral agreements with the Sheriff's Department of Hampden County.
Failure to respond to this request within 30 days may result in a motion to compel and further legal action.
---
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
The warehouser claims that my property is at * race St. But I have evidence that shows that it is South of * race St., a location not authorized by the Massachusetts authority. How do I emphasize this as an interrogatory question
Case Rating: *
To emphasize your point as an interrogatory question, you can phrase it like this:
"Please identify the exact location where my property is stored. Specifically, provide evidence that the property is stored at * Race St., along with any documentation authorizing this location. Additionally, explain why the property is not stored at a location south of * Race St., which is not authorized by the Massachusetts authority."
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
To emphasize your point as an interrogatory question, you can phrase it like this:
"Please identify the exact location where my property is stored. Specifically, provide evidence that the property is stored at * Race St., along with any documentation authorizing this location. Additionally, explain why the property is not stored at a location south of * Race St., which is not authorized by the Massachusetts authority."
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
The warehouser claims that my property is at * race St., where he was previously licensed. I have evidence that shows that the actual address is South of * race St., a location not authorized by the Massachusetts authority.
How do I emphasize this as an interrogatory question?
Case Rating: *
To emphasize your point as an interrogatory question, you can phrase it like this:
"Please provide the precise address where my property is currently stored. Specifically:
- Provide documentation confirming the property is stored at * Race St., including the dates of licensure for this location.
- Explain and provide evidence why the property is stored at a location south of * Race St., which I have evidence is not authorized by the Massachusetts authority."
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
To emphasize your point as an interrogatory question, you can phrase it like this:
"Please provide the precise address where my property is currently stored. Specifically:
- Provide documentation confirming the property is stored at * Race St., including the dates of licensure for this location.
- Explain and provide evidence why the property is stored at a location south of * Race St., which I have evidence is not authorized by the Massachusetts authority."
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
please enhance; Do you have a license or the authority to take possession of a federal passport?
Case Rating: *
---Here's an enhanced version of your question:
"Do you possess a license or the legal authority to take possession of a federal passport?"
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
---Here's an enhanced version of your question:
"Do you possess a license or the legal authority to take possession of a federal passport?"
If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
Please enhance; I am resubmitting the New York Supreme Court agreement to the District BK court in MA and to the WHC this time emphasizing estoppel violation and tie it to a possible RICO claim.
Estoppel
In a New York Supreme Court Agreement (EX-*.* * dex992.htm) on______, The Bank of New York Mellon as trustee argued and claimed damages against Countrywide Bank and Bank of America for * securitized trusts were damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans. One of the * securitized Trust was Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (BNYMT) for CWALT Alternative Loan *-J7, which incorporated the **** King Jr. and Terri Mayes-King loans originated by ComUnity Lending Inc. That company filed liquidating bankruptcy January 4th * with * Dba(s). The specific origination discrepancies for this loan Included:
Case Rating: *
Here's an enhanced version of your submission:
---
Here's an enhanced version of your submission:
---
Estoppel
In a New York Supreme Court Agreement (EX-*.* * dex992.htm) on ______, The Bank of New York Mellon as trustee argued and claimed damages against Countrywide Bank and Bank of America for * securitized trusts damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans. One of the * securitized trusts was Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (BNYMT) for CWALT Alternative Loan *-J7, which incorporated the **** King Jr. and Terri Mayes-King loans originated by ComUnity Lending Inc. That company filed for liquidating bankruptcy on January *, *, with * DBAs. The specific origination discrepancies for this loan included:
- [Detail the discrepancies here]
In a New York Supreme Court Agreement (EX-*.* * dex992.htm) on ______, The Bank of New York Mellon as trustee argued and claimed damages against Countrywide Bank and Bank of America for * securitized trusts damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans. One of the * securitized trusts was Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (BNYMT) for CWALT Alternative Loan *-J7, which incorporated the **** King Jr. and Terri Mayes-King loans originated by ComUnity Lending Inc. That company filed for liquidating bankruptcy on January *, *, with * DBAs. The specific origination discrepancies for this loan included:
- [Detail the discrepancies here]
RICO Claim
Pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), these deficiencies demonstrate a pattern of racketeering activity, including but not limited to fraud, misrepresentation, and other illegal acts. The estoppel violation in the New York Supreme Court Agreement provides clear evidence of the Defendants' continuous and systematic fraudulent behavior, which is actionable under RICO.
Pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), these deficiencies demonstrate a pattern of racketeering activity, including but not limited to fraud, misrepresentation, and other illegal acts. The estoppel violation in the New York Supreme Court Agreement provides clear evidence of the Defendants' continuous and systematic fraudulent behavior, which is actionable under RICO.
Relief Sought
In light of the above, this submission emphasizes the estoppel violation and ties it to a potential RICO claim, seeking appropriate relief and remedies under the law.
---
If you need further assistance or have more details to include, feel free to ask!
In light of the above, this submission emphasizes the estoppel violation and ties it to a potential RICO claim, seeking appropriate relief and remedies under the law.
---
If you need further assistance or have more details to include, feel free to ask!
Discrepancies; - The loan was bifurcated into two loans, the first four $* million and the second for $*,*. - This total package of $*,*,* greatly exceeded the legal lending limit based on the town of Longmeadow's appraisal of $*,*,* and any other appraisal within * miles. - The original refinance loan was non-conforming and bifurcated to conceal it being * % above the legal lending limit and above the amount that the King's qualified being able to pay.
- The teaser rate of $*,*, which escalated to $*,*, further violated lending laws, making the loans "doomed to fail."
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification:
- Could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification:
- Could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
please enhance
-The loan was bifurcated into two loans, the first four $* million and the second for $*,*. - This total package of $*,*,* greatly exceeded the legal lending limit based on the town's appraisal of $*,*,* and any other appraisal within * miles. - The original loan was non-conforming and bifurcated to conceal it being * % above the legal lending limit and above the amount that the Kings were qualified being able to pay. - The teaser rate of $*,*, which escalated to $*,*, further violated lending laws, making the loans "doomed to fail."
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's the enhanced version:
- The loan was bifurcated into two amounts: the first for $* million and the second for $*,*.
- This total package of $*,*,* greatly exceeded the legal lending limit based on the town's appraisal of $*,*,* and any other appraisal within * miles.
- The original loan was non-conforming and was bifurcated to conceal it being *% above the legal lending limit and above the amount that the Kings were qualified to pay.
- The teaser rate of $*,*, which escalated to $*,*, further violated lending laws, making the loans "doomed to fail."
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification:
- Could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
Sure, here's the enhanced version:
- The loan was bifurcated into two amounts: the first for $* million and the second for $*,*.
- This total package of $*,*,* greatly exceeded the legal lending limit based on the town's appraisal of $*,*,* and any other appraisal within * miles.
- The original loan was non-conforming and was bifurcated to conceal it being *% above the legal lending limit and above the amount that the Kings were qualified to pay.
- The teaser rate of $*,*, which escalated to $*,*, further violated lending laws, making the loans "doomed to fail."
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification:
- Could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
Please continue to enhance the discrepancies; -On December *, *,. an invalid modification of only one of the original refinance loans was implemented by Bank of America Home Loans, who did not have any recorded interest and the property.
On January *, *, BNY Mellon initiated a lawsuit claiming that the same loans were not damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans after receiving an $*.* billion reimbursement for the compromised loans. Engaging in double-dipping, they bought charged-off, time-barred, and distressed debt, then falsified it as secured claims in court to deceitfully foreclose in an ongoing conspiracy scheme to claim property.
Case Rating: *
Sure, here's an enhanced version of the discrepancies:
- On December *, *, an invalid modification of only one of the original refinance loans was implemented by Bank of America Home Loans, who did not have any recorded interest in the property.
- On January *, *, BNY Mellon initiated a lawsuit claiming that the same loans were not damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans after receiving an $*.* billion reimbursement for the compromised loans.
- Engaging in double-dipping, they bought charged-off, time-barred, and distressed debt, then falsified it as secured claims in court to deceitfully foreclose in an ongoing conspiracy scheme to claim property.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Sure, here's an enhanced version of the discrepancies:
- On December *, *, an invalid modification of only one of the original refinance loans was implemented by Bank of America Home Loans, who did not have any recorded interest in the property.
- On January *, *, BNY Mellon initiated a lawsuit claiming that the same loans were not damaged due to deficiencies in the origination of these loans after receiving an $*.* billion reimbursement for the compromised loans.
- Engaging in double-dipping, they bought charged-off, time-barred, and distressed debt, then falsified it as secured claims in court to deceitfully foreclose in an ongoing conspiracy scheme to claim property.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
please enhance; The invalid modification was signed by only one of the three original parties, Terri Mayes-King. The signatures of CLI, the original refinance lender, who was in liquidating bankruptcy from January * *, ending November *, * and **** King Jr. were omitted. There is not any record presented of the Northern California bankruptcy court approving this modification. Bank of America Home Loans did not sign the December *, *, deceptive document until March *, *.
Case Rating: *
Here's the enhanced version:
- The invalid modification was signed by only one of the three original parties, Terri Mayes-King.
- The signatures of CLI, the original refinance lender, who was in liquidating bankruptcy from January *, *, to November *, *, and **** King Jr. were omitted.
- There is no record of the Northern California bankruptcy court approving this modification.
- Bank of America Home Loans did not sign the December *, *, deceptive document until March *, *.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Here's the enhanced version:
- The invalid modification was signed by only one of the three original parties, Terri Mayes-King.
- The signatures of CLI, the original refinance lender, who was in liquidating bankruptcy from January *, *, to November *, *, and **** King Jr. were omitted.
- There is no record of the Northern California bankruptcy court approving this modification.
- Bank of America Home Loans did not sign the December *, *, deceptive document until March *, *.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
please enhance; On December *, *, BNYMT claimed that they were assigned King’s mortgage contract by a non party, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, (MERS) who made it clear in a public announcement in Reuters News, July *, *, that they would no longer be affiliated with any assignments of property for their members. In addition, MERS was only a nominee for the original refinance lender, CLI, who was in liquidate bankruptcy. Again, there was not any approval of this transaction by then Northern California bankruptcy Court.
Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification, could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
Here's the enhanced version:
- On December *, *, BNYMT claimed that they were assigned King’s mortgage contract by a non-party, Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS).
- MERS had publicly announced on July *, *, via Reuters News, that they would no longer be affiliated with any assignments of property for their members.
- Additionally, MERS was only a nominee for the original refinance lender, CLI, which was in liquidating bankruptcy.
- There was no approval of this transaction by the Northern California bankruptcy court.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
For further clarification, could you provide more details about the lender's practices and specific violations you believe they committed?
Here's the enhanced version:
- On December *, *, BNYMT claimed that they were assigned King’s mortgage contract by a non-party, Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS).
- MERS had publicly announced on July *, *, via Reuters News, that they would no longer be affiliated with any assignments of property for their members.
- Additionally, MERS was only a nominee for the original refinance lender, CLI, which was in liquidating bankruptcy.
- There was no approval of this transaction by the Northern California bankruptcy court.
Start a new chat