Quiet Title Vs Try Title

Summary

Quiet title and try title actions in massachusetts resolve property ownership disputes. Quiet title establishes a partys title, while try title requires possession and a formal procedure. Foreclosure notices in massachusetts do not require the auctioneers name, but must include sale details. Consult a local attorney for specific guidance.

Full Conversation

is auctioneers name required on foreclosure notice of sale in massachusetts
In Massachusetts, the auctioneer's name is not explicitly required on the foreclosure notice of sale. However, the notice must include:
- The date, time, and place of the sale.
- A description of the property.
- The terms of the sale.
Would you like more detailed information on the foreclosure process?
Is the auctioneers name required implicitly
In Massachusetts, the auctioneer's name is not implicitly required on the foreclosure notice of sale. The key requirements are the date, time, place, property description, and terms of the sale.
Do you need additional information regarding foreclosure requirements or processes?
are auctioneers required by other regulations or their license requirements to list names and license numbers on notices of sale ?
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, auctioneers are not specifically required by state law or licensing regulations to list their names and license numbers on notices of sale. However, it may be advisable to include this information for transparency and compliance with best practices.
Is there anything else you need help with?
What best practices are you referring to?
Case Rating: *
Best practices refer to guidelines or recommendations that are widely accepted as being effective and efficient in a given industry or profession. For auctioneers, including their names and license numbers on notices of sale helps ensure transparency and builds trust with potential buyers. It also provides a clear point of contact for any inquiries or disputes.
Do you have any other questions related to foreclosure or property sales?
if I claim that the party who attempts to foreclose does not own the mortgage is it a good idea to rescind the mortgage under 3 day rule (* UCC *), 3 year rule and general rescission for uttery and fraud (appraisal/application)?
Case Rating: *
If you believe the party attempting to foreclose doesn’t own the mortgage, there are legal avenues to explore:
- *-Day Rule (* U.S.C. § *): Typically applies to rescission in certain consumer credit transactions.
- *-Year Rule: Applies if proper disclosures were not made.
- General Rescission for Fraud: Requires proof of fraud.
Would you like more detailed guidance on any of these options?
I can prove the appraisal fraud, and application income misstatement by the financial institution. i also have securitization expert affidavit that the mortgage never transferred to the REMIC trust during securitization and that subsequent attempted judicial assignment could not assign the mortgage to the trust according to the rules of the PSA and it was untimely (after the REMIC tryst closed). Finally the judicial assignment was based on the mortgagee claims that they own the promissory note which securitization experts states is not the case. Would that be sufficient proof of fraud and grounds for rescission?
Case Rating: *
Your situation seems to involve significant legal complexities and multiple potential violations, making it a high-value case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
If I mail mortgage rescission to all potential involved parties on such basis would the mortgage rescission be effective upon mailing per Jesinoski v Countrywide and the alleged mortgagee could not foreclose the mortgage that does not exist?
Case Rating: *
Your situation appears to be a high-value case due to the complexity and potential fraud involved. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
how does theory of recoupment or set-off apply to mortgage foreclosures
Case Rating: *
The theory of recoupment or set-off can be a defense in mortgage foreclosure cases. It allows the borrower to claim that the lender owes them money due to overcharges, fraud, or other breaches. This can reduce or eliminate the amount owed on the mortgage.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
can recoupment and set-off be used in adversary proceedings in a bankruptcy court
Case Rating: *
Recoupment and set-off can indeed be used in adversary proceedings in bankruptcy court. These defenses allow a debtor to reduce the creditor's claim by asserting that the creditor owes the debtor money due to related transactions.
Is there a specific issue you are dealing with in bankruptcy court?
what if the creditor cannot prove the claim
Case Rating: *
If a creditor cannot prove the claim in a bankruptcy court or foreclosure proceeding, it can have significant implications:
- The creditor’s claim may be dismissed.
- The debtor might not be held liable for the disputed amount.
- It can strengthen the debtor’s position in the case.
Do you want to know the specific legal steps you can take if a creditor cannot prove their claim?
can recoupment and set-off be used to recover money paid to the alleged creditor in the proof of claim is not proven
Case Rating: *
Recoupment and set-off can be used to recover money paid to an alleged creditor if the proof of claim is not proven:
- Recoupment: Allows reducing the creditor's claim by the amount the creditor owes the debtor from the same transaction.
- Set-off: Involves mutual debts between the same parties, even if from different transactions.
Do you need more detailed information on how to proceed with recoupment and set-off in your case?
which massachusetts statute addresses rescission of contract for fraud
Case Rating: *
The Massachusetts statute addressing rescission of a contract for fraud falls under common law principles. Rescission can be pursued when there is proof of fraud, misrepresentation, or undue influence. Key elements include:
- Proof of fraudulent misrepresentation.
- Demonstrating reliance on the misrepresentation.
- Showing that the misrepresentation caused harm.
Would you like more detailed information on this topic?
would it fall under the statute of frauds
Case Rating: *
The Statute of Frauds typically requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable, such as contracts for the sale of land or agreements that cannot be performed within one year.
Could you provide more details about the contract or agreement in question?
are promissory notes typically notarized
Case Rating: *
Promissory notes are not typically required to be notarized. However, notarization can add an extra layer of validation and security, making it harder for the validity of the note to be questioned.
Is there a particular concern you have regarding a promissory note?
are mortgages typically notarized
Case Rating: *
Mortgages are typically notarized to ensure their legality and authenticity. This process helps in preventing fraud and confirms the identities of the parties involved.
Do you have any other questions or specific concerns about your mortgage?
If I file a complaint in the superior court alleging mortgage fraud can I join the earlier case from the land court to invalidate the judgment that resulted from fraud upon the court?
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, you may be able to join an earlier case from the land court to invalidate a judgment resulting from fraud upon the court by filing a motion in the superior court. Specific procedures and requirements will vary.
Would you like more detailed guidance on the process?
If I file a verified complaint in court, signed under the penalty of perjury, do I need to create additional affidavits to attest to the facts in this matter
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, a verified complaint signed under penalty of perjury generally serves as an affidavit. However, additional affidavits may be necessary to support specific claims or provide supplementary evidence.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a verified complaint and the potential need for additional affidavits?
do I need to create my personal affidavits if the complaint is already verified
Case Rating: *
A verified complaint, signed under penalty of perjury, generally serves as an affidavit in Massachusetts. However, additional affidavits may still be necessary to support specific claims or to provide supplementary evidence.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing a verified complaint and the potential need for additional affidavits?
what is the difference between TRO and preliminary injunction?
Case Rating: *
A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and a Preliminary Injunction both serve to maintain the status quo until a final decision is made, but they have key differences:
- TRO: A short-term measure issued without notice to the other party, typically lasts a few days.
- Preliminary Injunction: Issued after a hearing with both parties, lasts until the case is resolved.
Is there a specific situation where you might need either a TRO or a Preliminary Injunction?
so I can ask the court to issue a TRO to stop foreclosure auction in 2 days and for a preliminary after the hearing?
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can request a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop the foreclosure auction in 2 days, and then seek a Preliminary Injunction after the hearing to maintain the halt until the case is resolved.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
What issues would be heard during the TRO hearing?
Case Rating: *
During a TRO hearing, the court will typically consider the following issues:
- Immediate threat of irreparable harm.
- Likelihood of success on the merits of the case.
- Balance of harms between the parties.
- Public interest considerations.
Do you have any specific concerns or details about your case that you would like to discuss?
If the facts are in my favor would the judge rule that I nned to file for Preliminary Injunction?
Case Rating: *
A judge will consider the facts, merits of your case, and the immediate threat of harm during a TRO hearing. If the facts are in your favor, it's possible the judge will issue a TRO and then require you to seek a Preliminary Injunction to maintain the status quo.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with your request for a Preliminary Injunction?
I plan to file a clarification of title affidavit under * 5b presenting facts that the alleged mortgage is not a person entitled to foreclose, presenting evidence of fraudulent notes and mortgages they sent me as the evidence of debt. If the alleged mortgage decides to hold foreclosure sale anyway, would they be able to record the foreclosure deed after my filing of * 5b affidavit.
Case Rating: *
If you file a clarification of title affidavit under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter *, Section 5B, and present evidence of fraudulent notes and mortgages, it may delay or complicate the foreclosure process. However, if the alleged mortgagee proceeds with the foreclosure sale, they might attempt to record the foreclosure deed. Your affidavit may provide grounds to challenge the validity of the foreclosure and prevent the recording of the deed.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with your affidavit or how to challenge the foreclosure sale?
What step would I have to take to prevent the recording of the deed?
Case Rating: *
To prevent the recording of the foreclosure deed, you can file a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and a Preliminary Injunction with the court to stop the foreclosure process. This will temporarily halt the recording of the deed until the court can hear your case.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need to collect some necessary information.
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
In that case it might be better to file a complaint and the TRO to stop foreclosure instead of * 5B
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a complex and potentially strong case regarding mortgage fraud and foreclosure. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If yes, I will need to collect some necessary information.
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
what is the purpose of requesting a payoff quote from the alleged mortgagee
Case Rating: *
Requesting a payoff quote from the alleged mortgagee serves several purposes:
- It confirms the exact amount needed to fully pay off the mortgage.
- It provides a formal statement of the outstanding balance, including principal, interest, fees, and other charges.
- It can reveal any discrepancies or errors in the mortgage account.
Do you have any concerns about the payoff quote or the amount stated by the mortgagee?
can asking for a payoff quote potentially delay scheduled foreclosure sale
Case Rating: *
Requesting a payoff quote generally does not delay a scheduled foreclosure sale. The foreclosure process continues unless specific legal actions, such as filing a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or Preliminary Injunction, are taken to halt it.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with stopping the foreclosure sale?
If I file a police report alleging fraud in mortgage documentation and that the alleged mortgage is planning to hold foreclosure sale based on fraudulent documents, can I ask the police to stop the sale pending investigation by the police, district attorney and or Mass attorney general?
Case Rating: *
Your case involves significant allegations of mortgage fraud and could greatly benefit from legal intervention to halt the foreclosure process. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
If two homeowners are listed on the mortgage can one of them file a complaint and motion for TRO to stop foreclosure
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, any one of the homeowners listed on the mortgage can file a complaint and a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop foreclosure.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need to collect some necessary information.
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
If the filing is done by one of the homeowners can the other homeowner create and file affidavits into action if necessary
Case Rating: *
Yes, if one of the homeowners files a complaint and motion for a TRO, the other homeowner can create and file affidavits into the action to support the case. This can strengthen the evidence and claims presented.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with your case?
Once the TRO request is granted by the court, sale is enjoined and the TRO hearing is scheduled can I ask for leave of court to amend complaint
Case Rating: *
Yes, you can ask for leave of court to amend your complaint once the TRO request is granted and the sale is enjoined. This can help you include any additional claims or correct any issues in your original complaint.
Would you like more detailed guidance on amending your complaint?
During that leave can I file a motion in the land court to vacate the * judgment based on fraud upon the court, new information discovered?
Case Rating: *
Your case involves complex legal issues and potential fraud, making it potentially high-value. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
During that leave can I file a motion in the land court to vacate the * judgment and then join the land court case to the superior court case
Case Rating: *
In Massachusetts, you can file a motion in the Land Court to vacate the * judgment based on fraud upon the court and new information discovered. Subsequently, you might be able to join the Land Court case to the Superior Court case.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
I presume that while the lea ve of court is pending in the superior court the other party cannot attempt to remove to the district court
Case Rating: *
Your presumption that while a leave of court is pending in the Superior Court the other party cannot attempt to remove to the District Court is correct. The jurisdiction remains with the Superior Court until a final decision is made or the case is otherwise transferred.
Would you like more detailed guidance on this topic or have other questions?
I suppose I could also ask the superior court to vacate the land court judgment based on the new information
Case Rating: *
Your case involves complex legal issues, including potential mortgage fraud and procedural nuances in joining cases from different courts. It sounds like a high-value case.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need to collect some necessary information. Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
Or for a declaration that the land court judgment is void
Case Rating: *
Your case involves significant legal complexities, including fraud and procedural issues with multiple courts. It is advisable to consult with a local lawyer for detailed assistance.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, I will need to collect some necessary information.
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?