Property Condemnation Legalities

Summary

Under Arizona law, municipalities can condemn property for public utilities and parks. However, repurposing previously condemned land for a new public use, like a trail, may require additional legal steps. The City of Phoenix v. Harnish (2006) case set some precedents but does not automatically protect properties from such actions. Consulting a local attorney can provide specific guidance based on your situation.

Full Conversation

Am I protected from a trail condemnation by City of Phoenix v. Harnish *?
The case of City of Phoenix v. Harnish (*) involved eminent domain and the requirements for public use. While it set some precedents, it doesn't automatically protect properties from condemnation for trails or parks. Each case is unique, and additional legal interpretation may be necessary. Consulting a local attorney can provide specific guidance based on the details of your situation. Do you want more information about eminent domain laws in Arizona?
ARS *-* says cities may acquire properties extraterritorialy for public utility and public park purposes. the City of Flagstaff condemned my property for a waterline/public utility. The waterline is complete and functional. They now want property rights within the same easement but by a new acquisition for a public park/trail. Do they have lawful authority?
In Arizona, under ARS § *-*, cities can acquire property for public utility and park purposes. However, converting previously condemned property for a new public use like a trail may involve additional legal proceedings. Consulting a local attorney would be wise to understand your rights and potential defenses in this specific situation. Would you like to know more about how to protect your property rights?