Utility Easement Legal Rights

have a municipal utility easement running through my property. The utility company is replacing an old water pipeline. They want to rip up the old line and place a new one. I do not want all my natural assets removed. They have old growth trees marked for removal. They were here before the old pipeline. They let the easement go untouched and unused for several decades, now they want to rip it up. I was told by their contractor that they told the company they should go down the main road instead of through the original route which takes them far out into the countryside and has far more environmental impact. Many of the marked trees are marked np, which the contractor told me means they were not in the initial report and plan. How could they have an accurate environmental impact assessment if they are that many trees off? I want them to leave the old pipeline alone and go down the road that is also the easement line on my property, instead of through all my trees and shrubs, which would be more cost efficient, less work, easier to do, and much less environmental impact. Do I have a right to demand this legally? Can I file an injunction to protect my land? The EIR has already had to be altered due to me pointing out discrepancies in their dataset. They estimated around * trees would need removal over the entirety of the project. There are at least * trees marked np on my property alone. How can an accurate environment impact assessment have been completed if there's that great of discrepancy in one small section of the project? I have published statements on the draft report, and have adamantly voiced my objections to the destruction of well established trees and shrubs housing a host of wildlife. The route I am proposing is a clear line of sight from one potholed, established point, down an entirely clear of trees section of slope which gives the line up to * feet of easement to work with and only diverts at most a couple hundred feet total from original route, but leaves untouched an entire grove of forest. I informed them they can leave the old line where it lies and that would be fine. They informed me that they will not put any effort into altering their route despite the damage and depreciation in value to my property. They only have a 25ft easement according to the original agreement set in *. I have thoroughly documented and actively participated the entire time since discussions began. They have used the excuse stating they are leaving things as good or better than before they arrived to continue blocking an illegally blocked easement road by replacing illegally set boulders back in place, but refuse to give my request any consideration. The blocked easement is illegally blocked by a neighbor who doesn't even own the land he is blocking. I feel my request is very minimal, logical, effective , more cost efficient, and far more friendly to the environment in an already decimated landscape. I do not feel that this utility has any consideration or respect for nature, and has become fearless in its abuse of it. They expect no consequences for their actions, and have become negligent in there duties and obligations to abide by regulations set forth to protect it. This is in El Dorado county, California

Yes please , as well as any contact information you may have for environmental advocacy groups in my area, if possible. Thank you very much, amazing intelligence. You are appreciated.