Land Ownership Dispute Resolution

Summary

Under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, a Scheduled Caste (SC) individuals land cannot be transferred to a non-SC without Collectors permission. Unauthorized transactions can be voided, potentially leading to government possession. Ramus cancellation of the power of attorney and subsequent sale to Devi is valid. However, Mauryas prior sale to Sheela without permission is likely void. Legal consultation is recommended for resolving disputes and understanding the implications of these transactions.

Full Conversation

need answer as per उत्तर प्रदेश राजस्व संहिता *
Sure, I can help you with information related to the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, *. Could you please specify your legal issue or the section of the code you need information about? This will help me provide more precise details.
person name maurya toke power of attony on land of schedule cast (SC) person ramu and sold land to non sc person name sheela , when ramu came to know about the sale deed, he complained to revenu department and also cancelled power of attony, ..then the ramu sold land to other Sc person name devi after cancelling powr of attony .
Under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, *:
- A Scheduled Caste (SC) individual cannot transfer land to a non-SC without permission from the Collector.
- Any unauthorized transaction can be declared void.
- Cancellation of a power of attorney nullifies any unauthorized sale.
- Ramu's sale to Devi is valid post cancellation.
For detailed advice, consulting a legal expert may be beneficial.
now who is cotdian of land and to whom it belong
Based on the situation and the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, *:
- Initially, Ramu held the land and granted power of attorney to Maurya.
- Since Ramu canceled the power of attorney and sold the land to Devi, the land belongs to Devi, assuming the transaction was valid and compliant with the law.
- Devi should be considered the custodian of the land now.
If there are disputes or complications, consulting a legal expert is advisable for resolution.
but maurya sold land to sheela before cancellation of power of attony and without permissio from ramu
Case Rating: *
Maurya's sale of land to Sheela before the cancellation of the power of attorney and without Ramu's permission may be considered unauthorized. According to the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, *, such a transaction can be declared void, especially as it involves a Scheduled Caste individual. Ramu's subsequent sale to Devi, after canceling the power of attorney, should be valid. Devi is likely the rightful owner now, but legal disputes may require consultation with a legal expert for further resolution.
revenu code * also say if it is concider void it become property of governement
Case Rating: *
It seems that you're questioning the validity of the sale made by Maurya to Sheela under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, *. If the transaction is declared void under the code, and it involves SC land sold to a non-SC without proper authorization, the government may indeed take possession of the land. It would be wise to seek legal advice to challenge or understand the implications of the transaction further.