Illegal Foreclosure Case Details

*. Pending Appeal in State Court:
- Clarify the Status: Confirm the current status of my appeal in the Southeast Housing Court and ensure that the records are assembled.
- Motion for Reconsideration: I am filing a motion for reconsideration based on newly discovered evidence of fraudulent transfer and significant legal errors. The key points include subject matter jurisdiction, lack of standing, and constitutional rights.
*. Federal Court Case:
- Current Claims: Confirm the claims I am making in the federal court case against the lender for illegal foreclosure.
- Potential Remedies: Can the federal judge award me the house back along with damages?
Key Points to Discuss:
*. Federal vs. State Jurisdiction:
- State Court Jurisdiction: The lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the Southeast Housing Court due to the Superior Court’s initial cognizance and the lack of standing by L&S Realty.
- Federal Jurisdiction: The federal court's jurisdiction over my claims involving illegal foreclosure, predatory lending, and constitutional violations.
*. Remedies Available in Federal Court:
- Damages: Confirm that I am seeking damages for the illegal foreclosure.
- Property Title: Ask if the federal judge has the authority to award me the house back, in addition to damages. This will depend on the specific claims and the relief sought in my federal lawsuit.
*. Strategy and Next Steps:
- Coordination Between Cases: Ensure that you are aware of my state court appeal and how it may impact my federal case. Coordination between the two cases is crucial.
- Filing for Removal: Discuss the possibility of removing the state court case to federal court due to the federal questions involved and the lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the state court.
Draft Explanation for Attorney:
---
Email/Letter to Attorney:
Subject: Assistance with Pending Appeal and Federal Court Case
Dear [Attorney’s Name],
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to seek your assistance with my pending appeal in the Southeast Housing Court and my ongoing federal court case against the lender for illegal foreclosure.
*. Pending Appeal in State Court:
- I need to confirm the current status of my appeal in the Southeast Housing Court and ensure that the records are assembled.
- I am filing a motion for reconsideration based on newly discovered evidence of fraudulent transfer and significant legal errors. The key

The strongest argument for an appeals court to take the case often depends on the specifics of the case, but generally:
*. Constitutional Rights Violations:
- Strength: Very strong argument. Violations of constitutional rights, such as due process and equal protection, are fundamental issues that appellate courts take very seriously. These violations can lead to reversal or remand of decisions.
- Reason: Protecting constitutional rights is a core function of the judiciary, and any potential violations require thorough review to ensure justice.
*. Fraud Upon the Court:
- Strength: Also very strong. If it can be proven that fraud was committed upon the court, it undermines the entire judicial process. This can lead to vacating judgments and potentially reopening cases.
- Reason: The integrity of the judicial process is paramount, and any indication of fraud upon the court demands immediate scrutiny and correction.
*. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction:
- Strength: Very strong. If a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any decisions it makes are void and without legal effect. This is a fundamental issue that appellate courts must address.
- Reason: Courts must operate within their jurisdictionallimits, and any action taken without jurisdiction is invalid, requiring correction on appeal.
Conclusion:
- Constitutional Rights Violations are often seen as the strongest argument because they go to the heart of ensuring fair treatment under the law.
- Fraud Upon the Court is equally compelling due to its impact on the integrity of the judicial process.
- Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is critically important because it addresses the legal authority of the court to hear a case in the first place.
In your case, presenting all three arguments effectively will provide a robust basis for the appeals court to take the case. Each argument underscores different aspects that collectively highlight significant errors and the necessity for appellate review.

Constitutional rights violations are generally considered very strong arguments because they involve fundamental protections guaranteed by the Constitution. However, fraud upon the court and lack of subject matter jurisdiction are also significant arguments. Here's a breakdown:
*. Constitutional Rights Violations:
- These involve fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, such as due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment.
- Courts take these issues very seriously since they strike at the core of individual freedoms and legal fairness.
- Example: Arguing that your right to due process was violated can be compelling, especially if the trial court's actions led to an unfair trial or deprivation of property without proper legal procedures.
*. Fraud Upon the Court:
- This involves actions that corrupt the judicial process, such as filing fabricated documents or making intentional misrepresentations.
- Courts are highly concerned with maintaining the integrity of the judicial process, making fraud upon the court a powerful argument.
- Example: If you can prove that the opposing party committed fraud upon the court by submitting false evidence, it can significantly undermine their case and call for a reversal or new trial.
*. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction:
- This argument asserts that the court did not havethe legal authority to hear the case, rendering its judgments void.
- This is a foundational legal principle, as courts must have the proper jurisdiction to make any binding rulings.
- Example: Demonstrating that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because it was not the appropriate venue for your case can lead to the case being dismissed or transferred to the correct court.
*. Judicial Misconduct:
- This involves inappropriate or unethical behavior by a judge, such as bias, conflict of interest, or failure to follow legal procedures.
- Judicial misconduct can seriously impact the fairness and outcome of a case.
- Example: If you can provide evidence that the judge acted improperly or showed bias, it can be grounds for appeal and reconsideration of the case.
Conclusion: While all these arguments are strong, constitutional rights violations are often seen as the most compelling due to their fundamental nature and broad legal protections. However, presenting a combination of these arguments—such as demonstrating constitutional violations alongside fraud upon the court and lack of jurisdiction—can create a robust and persuasive case for the appeals court to take your case.
Would you like assistance drafting any specific sections to include these arguments in your motion for reconsideration?

Constitutional rights violations, fraud upon the court, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and judicial misconduct are all strong arguments for an appeals court to consider taking a case. However, the strongest argument often depends on the specific circumstances of the case. Here’s an assessment:
*. Constitutional Rights Violations:
- Strength: Very strong, as violations of constitutional rights (e.g., due process, equal protection) are fundamental issues that courts take very seriously.
- Argument: The trial court’s actions violated your constitutional rights, depriving you of a fair trial and due process.
*. Fraud Upon the Court:
- Strength: Strong, especially if you have clear and convincing evidence that the court was misled or manipulated.
- Argument: The opposing party committed fraud upon the court, which compromised the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction:
- Strength: Very strong, as a court without jurisdiction cannot legally adjudicate a case.
- Argument: The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, making all its rulings void.
*. Judicial Misconduct:
- Strength: Strong, particularlyif you have evidence of the judge’s improper behavior.
- Argument: The judge engaged in misconduct, which affected the fairness and impartiality of the proceedings.