Bank Liability Case Summary

Summary

In the case of Uthama Kumara Naidu a/l Sundara Rajoo & Anor v HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd & Ors, the plaintiffs alleged misconduct and breach of duty by the bank in a transaction. The court found that the bank had not breached its duty, dismissing the plaintiffs claims. This case does not specifically address the banks right to withhold unredacted documents. For more specific legal advice, consult a local attorney.

Full Conversation

what was held
In the judgment of Uthama Kumara Naidu a/l Sundara Rajoo & Anor v HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd & Ors, the court held that the bank had not breached its duty in the transaction. The plaintiffs' claims were dismissed, and the bank was not held liable for the alleged misconduct.
Do you need more details on this case or have another question?
im looking for a case where the bank has a right not to give the unredacted copy, how would this case help
This case indicates that the bank was not found liable for alleged misconduct, but it does not specifically address the issue of the bank's right to withhold unredacted copies of documents.
Do you have more details or another specific aspect of the case you are interested in?