Check Cashing Account Denial

Summary

Brief Summary: If denied a check cashing account due to alleged fraud, consider contacting Ingo for evidence, filing a police report, and using the Fair Credit Reporting Act to dispute inaccuracies. Consulting a consumer rights attorney, contacting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and filing complaints with state financial regulators or the Federal Trade Commission are also potential steps. Mediation or small claims court may offer additional resolution avenues. These are general suggestions and not personal legal advice.

Full Conversation

ingo wont let me have a check cashing account due to fraud that didnt involve me what can I do to fix it so I can use their services ingo will not let me use their check cashing service through cash app or go2 bank due to a fraudulent use of my information that I had no control over I believe. Yet they will not say that to me or let me set up an account . I would like to find a way to fix it
Hello **** ****. Have you already filed a police report and communicated the issue with Ingo with the report as evidence? This might help them understand the situation better.
No, because I don't have the proof that that is the case from ingo
Hello **** ****, unfortunately, I cannot provide personal advice. However, in general:
*. Contact Ingo to request evidence or reason for the denial.
*. File a report with local police about fraud if you believe your information was misused.
*. Consider seeking legal counsel if the issue persists.
I never asked for personal advice.To be correct I am inquiring about legal remidies out side the scope of the modern standards in order to aid in my defence if need be to aquire their services
Understood, ****. Generally, you may:
*. Use the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to dispute inaccurate information.
*. Consult with a consumer rights attorney.
*. Contact the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for assistance.
*. Use arbitration or mediation services.
Please note, these are general suggestions and not personal legal advice.
If the services that you offer are not in any manner ment to be personal, then what right do you have to give advice on any level when dealing with the public, every legal matter in its entirety is personal on every level?
While we don't provide personal legal advice, we share general legal information based on common situations. Our goal is to help users understand their legal options and to educate them on the law. This information is general and doesn't replace the assistance of a legal professional.
What a wast of time for the common man. And who is we persay?
"We" refers to FreeLawChat. We aim to provide general legal information to help individuals understand their legal issues better. We do not provide personalized legal advice, but guide on what the law generally suggests in similar situations.
I see. Is there a more personal realistic AI option then?
While AI technology continues to evolve, currently there aren't AI options that can provide personal, realistic legal advice due to ethical and regulatory constraints. It's best to consult with a real attorney for personalized advice.
I dont want or need a lawyer I have an accurate knowledge of the law, I'm a common Law knowledgeable individual wo doesnt want to be represented by a state licensed person who calls what they do a practice.
Understood, ****. If you're looking for general legal remedies, you might want to consider:
*. Filing a complaint with your state's financial institution regulatory agency.
*. Initiating a small claims lawsuit if the amount involved is within the court's limit.
*. Using a private mediator to facilitate a resolution.
*. Filing a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Please remember these are general suggestions and not personal legal advice.