False Imprisonment Legal Considerations

Summary

False imprisonment claims against EMTs require evaluating their legal authority and the circumstances of detainment. Justifiable reasons for detainment may include perceived immediate risk despite coherence. Legal precedents like Brigham City v. Stuart highlight the limits of detentions under emergency aid exceptions. Discussing specific signs of overdose or medical emergencies with your lawyer is crucial. Your lawyer can provide tailored advice on the impact of evidence and timing of drug use on your case.

Full Conversation

If I guess I want to know if it's worth pursuing a false imprisonment / illegal detainment by the EMT who refused to let me out of my vehicle claiming he wanted to make sure I was okay for three solid minutes as I'm telling him repeatedly yes I'm okay I am coherent I'm answering your questions I'm not in a danger to myself and I would like to go back to my apartment please and he waited until the police officers arrived at which point I was questioned by then for about a minute and a half and I got arrested for possession of cocaine possession of Adderall drug instruments and drug paraphernalia
Pursuing a claim for false imprisonment or illegal detainment involves evaluating several factors:
- Whether the EMT had legal authority to detain you.
- If you were coherent and refused medical treatment competently.
- The impact of the detainment on your arrest.
You might consider discussing with a legal professional to determine the merits based on your specific circumstances. Would you like to be connected with local lawyers?
I have a lawyer give me some examples of cases where this has happened to somebody before like EMTs detain somebody wouldn't let them out of their vehicle until police arrived and then the police found drugs and then arrested them
There aren't specific widely-known cases exactly matching your scenario, but similar issues arise when individuals claim EMS or law enforcement exceeded their authority:
- Unreasonable Detention by EMS: The legality often hinges on whether EMS had a justifiable reason to believe immediate medical attention was necessary.
- Fourth Amendment Violations: Cases like *Brigham City v. Stuart* discuss limits on detentions under the guise of community caretaking.
Consulting with your lawyer for case-specific examples would be beneficial.
Explain Brigham City versus Stuart
Case Rating: *
Brigham City v. Stuart (*) addressed the "emergency aid" exception to the Fourth Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police can enter a home without a warrant if they reasonably believe someone inside is seriously injured or threatened with injury. The decision emphasized objective reasonableness over subjective intent.
What would be justifiable reasons if they came out because they got a call of somebody potentially overdosing in their vehicle I showed them I wasn't overdosing I was coherent with my speech I answered every question and they didn't leave after I repeated the ass to be allowed to leave my vehicle for three solid minutes what justification could they have
Case Rating: *
Justifiable reasons for EMS to detain someone could include:
- A reasonable belief that the person is at immediate risk of harm despite their coherence.
- An obligation to ensure safety based on the initial overdose report.
- Observing signs inconsistent with the person's self-assessment.
Discuss these points with your lawyer to see if they apply to your situation.
And what signs were being consistent
Case Rating: *
Signs that might be considered consistent with an overdose or medical emergency could include:
- Physical symptoms like pallor, excessive sweating, or tremors.
- Behavior that suggests confusion or disorientation.
- Evidence of drug use or paraphernalia visible to EMS personnel.
These points can be discussed with your lawyer to evaluate their applicability to your case.
Previous drug use I feel like that is a stretch you don't know when that drug was used
Case Rating: *
The concern over determining the timing of drug use is valid, as it can be challenging to pinpoint exactly when drugs were consumed. Discussing this with your lawyer can help clarify how this point may impact your case. Your situation might involve complex legal issues that could benefit from professional evaluation.
I did have blood on my arms from using but like you said it's hard to tell when that drive was used
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves complex legal issues surrounding potential unlawful detention by EMS and subsequent arrest. Since you mentioned having a lawyer, it's important to discuss the specifics with them as they can provide tailored advice, particularly concerning the evidence and timing of drug use. Would you like any further legal information or guidance?