Protection Order Legal Concerns

Summary

An 18-month delay in allowing a defendant to view discovery materials, coupled with a lack of communication from their attorney and denied motions for new counsel, may constitute an unreasonable delay under federal law, potentially infringing on the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Factors such as the length and reason for the delay, the defendants assertion of their rights, and any prejudice suffered are considered. Consulting a legal professional for specific advice is recommended.

Full Conversation

If there is a protection order preventing a defendant from viewing any discovery materials for over 18 months and his attorney doesn't communicate with him at all and the judge refused to appoint him new counsel during this time denying several motions for new counsel does that constitute unnecessary delay?
This situation might indeed raise concerns about an unreasonable delay, potentially infringing on the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Factors like the duration, reasons for delay, the defendant's efforts to assert their rights, and any prejudice suffered by the defendant are considered. Would you like assistance in connecting with a local lawyer who can offer detailed advice?