TRY ME!
Escalating Utility Charges Explained
Summary
A prior conviction is necessary to escalate charges under NC General Statute § 14‑151 from a misdemeanor to a felony. Since both charges are being prosecuted simultaneously, the second charge may not be elevated to a felony without a prior conviction. Legal defenses could include challenging the classification of charges and seeking legal representation. Additionally, allegations of gender-based discrimination and selective prosecution could impact the case. Documenting instances of bias and consulting a civil rights attorney may be beneficial.Full Conversation
My husband is charged with the below. Under the statute he is charged would there need to be a prior conviction in order to escalate the charge?
Hi ****! To provide more accurate information, could you please specify the statute number or the specific charge your husband is facing in Virginia? This will help determine if a prior conviction is necessary to escalate the charge.
NC General Statute § *‑*
Interfering with gas, electric, and steam appliances or meters; penalties.
(a) It is unlawful for any person to willfully, with intent to injure or defraud, commit any of the following acts:
(*)Reconnect electricity, gas, or water connections or otherwise turn back on one or more of those utilities when they have been lawfully disconnected or turned off by the provider of the utility
Penalties
(d) Criminal violations of this section are punishable as follows:
(*) A violation of this section is a Class * misdemeanor.
(*) A second or subsequent violation of this section is a Class H felony
In this situation, a prior conviction is required to escalate the charge from a Class * misdemeanor to a Class H felony. Since your husband is facing two counts, one for June * and another for June *, the second charge is considered a subsequent offense and therefore classified as a felony.
Would you like more specific information on the penalties associated with these charges?
Would you like more specific information on the penalties associated with these charges?
COUNT *:JUNE *, *: M-RECONNECT UTILITY *
Charge Description: On or about the date of offense shown and in the county named above the defendant unlawfully, and willfully did willfully and with the intent to injure or defraud Gates County Water Department reconnect water connection when it had been lawfully disconnected and turned off by the utility provider, Gates County Water Department
COUNT *: JUNE *, *: F-RECONNECT UTILITY 2ND/SUB OFF *
Charge Description: On or about the date of offense shown and in the county named above the defendant unlawfully, and willfully, and feloniously did willfully and with the intent to injure or defraud Gates County Water Department reconnect water connection when it had been lawfully disconnected and turned off by the utility provider, Gates County Water Department
Hi ****, based on the NC General Statute § *‑*, a prior conviction is required to escalate the charge from a Class * misdemeanor to a Class H felony. Since your husband has two counts, the second offense is classified as a felony.
Would you like more information on potential penalties or legal defenses for these charges?
Would you like more information on potential penalties or legal defenses for these charges?
June * has not been adjudicated yet
Hi ****! Given that the June * charge has not been adjudicated yet, it could impact how the charges are handled. The June * charge may not be considered a subsequent offense until there's a conviction for the June * charge. Would you like information on how to possibly defend against these charges or the penalties involved?
They are both being charged together for the first time.
Hi ****,
Since both charges are being prosecuted simultaneously without a prior conviction, your husband may have grounds to argue that the second charge should not be elevated to a felony. Consulting a lawyer could help clarify and potentially mitigate these charges.
Would you like more details on potential defenses or next steps?
Since both charges are being prosecuted simultaneously without a prior conviction, your husband may have grounds to argue that the second charge should not be elevated to a felony. Consulting a lawyer could help clarify and potentially mitigate these charges.
Would you like more details on potential defenses or next steps?
Yes
Here are some potential defenses and next steps:
- Challenge the Classification:
- Argue that without a prior adjudicated conviction, the second charge should not be elevated to a felony.
- Legal Representation:
- Consult a local attorney specializing in criminal defense to review the charges and represent your husband in court.
Would you like more details on finding a local attorney or additional defenses?
- Challenge the Classification:
- Argue that without a prior adjudicated conviction, the second charge should not be elevated to a felony.
- Legal Representation:
- Consult a local attorney specializing in criminal defense to review the charges and represent your husband in court.
Would you like more details on finding a local attorney or additional defenses?
Gender-Based Discrimination and Equal Protection Violations
Sheriff Campbell’s gender-based animus, as demonstrated by his dismissive and derogatory treatment of Mrs. Edwards (e.g., referring to her as “a peach”), constitutes a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. This conduct undermines the integrity of the prosecution and demonstrates bias motivated by gender.
Selective Prosecution and Retaliatory Discrimination
The Gates County Sheriff’s Department has engaged in selective prosecution of the Defendant’s family, motivated by retaliation for lawful complaints and appeals in an eviction case, as well as prejudice against the family’s support for their transgender son. This discriminatory targeting violates constitutional protections against selective prosecution and reflects bias that renders the prosecution unconstitutional.
Hi ****,
Your situation involves serious allegations of gender-based discrimination and selective prosecution, which could significantly impact the case. Here are some potential legal avenues:
- Equal Protection Clause Violation: Document all instances of gender-based animus and discriminatory behavior by Sheriff Campbell.
- Selective Prosecution: Gather evidence showing your family is being unfairly targeted compared to others in similar situations.
Would you like more details on how to document these violations or information on finding a civil rights attorney?
Your situation involves serious allegations of gender-based discrimination and selective prosecution, which could significantly impact the case. Here are some potential legal avenues:
- Equal Protection Clause Violation: Document all instances of gender-based animus and discriminatory behavior by Sheriff Campbell.
- Selective Prosecution: Gather evidence showing your family is being unfairly targeted compared to others in similar situations.
Would you like more details on how to document these violations or information on finding a civil rights attorney?
Gender-Based Discrimination and Equal Protection Violations
Sheriff Campbell’s gender-based animus, as demonstrated by his dismissive and derogatory treatment of Mrs. Edwards (e.g., referring to her as “a peach”), constitutes a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. This conduct undermines the integrity of the prosecution and demonstrates bias motivated by gender.
Selective Prosecution and Retaliatory Discrimination
The Gates County Sheriff’s Department has engaged in selective prosecution of the Defendant’s family, motivated by retaliation for lawful complaints and appeals in an eviction case, as well as prejudice against the family’s support for their transgender son. This discriminatory targeting violates constitutional protections against selective prosecution and reflects bias that renders the prosecution unconstitutional.
Hi ****, it seems your situation involves serious allegations of discrimination and constitutional violations. Here are some points to consider:
- Equal Protection Clause Violation:
- Evidence of gender-based discrimination can be crucial. Document any instances of bias or derogatory remarks (e.g., “a peach”).
- Selective Prosecution:
- Gather evidence of differential treatment or bias in prosecution, especially related to your family's support for your transgender son.
- Legal Support:
- Consulting with a civil rights attorney can help you navigate these claims and potentially file a complaint or lawsuit.
Would you like help finding a civil rights attorney in Virginia or more details on how to document these violations?
- Equal Protection Clause Violation:
- Evidence of gender-based discrimination can be crucial. Document any instances of bias or derogatory remarks (e.g., “a peach”).
- Selective Prosecution:
- Gather evidence of differential treatment or bias in prosecution, especially related to your family's support for your transgender son.
- Legal Support:
- Consulting with a civil rights attorney can help you navigate these claims and potentially file a complaint or lawsuit.
Would you like help finding a civil rights attorney in Virginia or more details on how to document these violations?
Start a new chat