TRY ME!
Controlled Substance And Firearm
Summary
Possession for sales of controlled substances with a firearm as a felon in California is a serious charge. Defenses may include challenging search legality, proving lack of possession, or questioning witness credibility. Probation compliance checks must respect stipulated living areas. Evidence found outside the probationers domain may be inadmissible if the search exceeded legal scope. Consider consulting a lawyer for specific guidance.Full Conversation
Ryan
Hi Ryan! Could you share a bit more about your legal issue so I can guide you better?
Possession for sales of controlled substance with a loaded firearm as a felon
That sounds like a serious issue, Ryan. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
No
Possession for sales of a controlled substance with a loaded firearm as a felon is indeed a serious charge in California. Here are some general points to consider:
- California has strict laws against possession and sales of controlled substances.
- Being a felon in possession of a firearm is a separate serious offense.
- Penalties can include significant fines and imprisonment.
Would you like to know more about possible defenses or court procedures?
- California has strict laws against possession and sales of controlled substances.
- Being a felon in possession of a firearm is a separate serious offense.
- Penalties can include significant fines and imprisonment.
Would you like to know more about possible defenses or court procedures?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In California, defenses for possession for sales of controlled substances and firearm possession by a felon may include:
- Challenging the legality of the search and seizure.
- Proving lack of possession or intent to sell.
- Questioning the credibility of witnesses.
If you have more specific questions about these defenses or court procedures, feel free to ask!
In California, defenses for possession for sales of controlled substances and firearm possession by a felon may include:
- Challenging the legality of the search and seizure.
- Proving lack of possession or intent to sell.
- Questioning the credibility of witnesses.
If you have more specific questions about these defenses or court procedures, feel free to ask!
My brother who is on probation had a compliance check. I personally have been off probation for almost a year but I was not even in possession of said items but there trying to charge me with them and neither of said items were even in my brothers living areas
Case Rating: *
It seems like a complex situation, especially since you're dealing with charges despite not being in possession. Here are some additional points to consider:
- If the items weren't in your possession or living area, you might argue lack of possession.
- Consider if there were any procedural errors during the compliance check.
Would you like more information on procedural rights or how to challenge evidence in court?
It seems like a complex situation, especially since you're dealing with charges despite not being in possession. Here are some additional points to consider:
- If the items weren't in your possession or living area, you might argue lack of possession.
- Consider if there were any procedural errors during the compliance check.
Would you like more information on procedural rights or how to challenge evidence in court?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In a situation like yours, challenging the evidence and understanding procedural rights can be vital. Here are some points to consider:
- Procedural Rights: Ensure that all legal procedures were followed during the compliance check.
- Challenging Evidence: You may argue that evidence was improperly obtained or not in your possession.
Let me know if you have more specific questions on this!
In a situation like yours, challenging the evidence and understanding procedural rights can be vital. Here are some points to consider:
- Procedural Rights: Ensure that all legal procedures were followed during the compliance check.
- Challenging Evidence: You may argue that evidence was improperly obtained or not in your possession.
Let me know if you have more specific questions on this!
So now if they ask who stays in a certain area of the home say the second story of the house and my brother and my dad both say me but when they asked me who stays upstairs I say I have no idea I don't go up there I stay downstairs I don't have access to it then
Case Rating: *
It seems like you are dealing with a misunderstanding regarding possession and control of certain areas in your home. In such situations, credibility and consistency in statements can be crucial. You may want to gather any evidence or witnesses that can support your claim of not having access to the second story. Do you have any specific questions about how to present this information in court or any other concerns?
It seems like you are dealing with a misunderstanding regarding possession and control of certain areas in your home. In such situations, credibility and consistency in statements can be crucial. You may want to gather any evidence or witnesses that can support your claim of not having access to the second story. Do you have any specific questions about how to present this information in court or any other concerns?
What are the procedures that probation must abide by and the law enforcement that are helping them and what are they allowed to do and not to do
Case Rating: *
In California, probation and law enforcement officers must adhere to specific procedures during compliance checks:
- Probation officers can conduct searches without a warrant if it's a condition of probation.
- Law enforcement must respect your rights, including against unreasonable searches.
- Officers must not exceed the scope of their authority.
Is there a specific aspect of their conduct you are concerned about?
In California, probation and law enforcement officers must adhere to specific procedures during compliance checks:
- Probation officers can conduct searches without a warrant if it's a condition of probation.
- Law enforcement must respect your rights, including against unreasonable searches.
- Officers must not exceed the scope of their authority.
Is there a specific aspect of their conduct you are concerned about?
Are they allowed to search areas of the home that had been previously stipulated are not part of the person who is on probation from which they are there for
Case Rating: *
In California, probation officers generally have the right to search areas accessible to the person on probation. However, areas explicitly stipulated as not part of the probationer's domain should typically be respected. If they overstep, it might be a violation. Consider consulting with a lawyer for specific guidance.
In California, probation officers generally have the right to search areas accessible to the person on probation. However, areas explicitly stipulated as not part of the probationer's domain should typically be respected. If they overstep, it might be a violation. Consider consulting with a lawyer for specific guidance.
What are the laws as to a person's accessibility in a mutually lived environment for felons
Case Rating: *
In California, here are some general points regarding accessibility for felons in a mutually lived environment:
- Felons have the right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches in areas not accessible to those on probation.
- Probation terms and conditions may limit access to certain areas.
- It's crucial to have clear agreements on living space access.
Do you have any specific questions about this situation?
In California, here are some general points regarding accessibility for felons in a mutually lived environment:
- Felons have the right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches in areas not accessible to those on probation.
- Probation terms and conditions may limit access to certain areas.
- It's crucial to have clear agreements on living space access.
Do you have any specific questions about this situation?
Yes so if specific living spaces are explained to the police during the compliance check is any of the stuff they find in the other people's living spaces submissible in court
Case Rating: *
In California, evidence found in areas clearly designated as not belonging to the probationer might be challenged as inadmissible if the search exceeded the legal scope. Proper documentation and witness testimony can support your claim. Would you like more information on challenging such evidence in court?
In California, evidence found in areas clearly designated as not belonging to the probationer might be challenged as inadmissible if the search exceeded the legal scope. Proper documentation and witness testimony can support your claim. Would you like more information on challenging such evidence in court?
So what is the meaning exceeding the legal scope of their warrant
Case Rating: *
Exceeding the legal scope of a warrant means law enforcement conducted a search or seizure beyond what was authorized by the warrant. This can include searching areas or items not specified in the warrant, leading to potential challenges to the admissibility of any evidence found there. Do you need further clarification on this?
Exceeding the legal scope of a warrant means law enforcement conducted a search or seizure beyond what was authorized by the warrant. This can include searching areas or items not specified in the warrant, leading to potential challenges to the admissibility of any evidence found there. Do you need further clarification on this?
Start a new chat