Defending Warrantless Police Arrests

To defend the police officer, you can argue the following points based on the Supreme Court judgments:
*. Reasonable Grounds: Emphasize that the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the arrest was necessary to prevent further criminal activity or to ensure the person's presence at trial, as highlighted in Joginder Kumar v. State of UP (*).
*. Necessity and Justification: Argue that the arrest was justified under the circumstances, aligning with the principles of necessity and reasonableness outlined in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (*).
*. Preventive Measures: Stress that the officer acted in good faith to maintain public safety and order, which can be a valid defense in certain situations.
Would you like more detailed information on these points?

Here are some similar Supreme Court cases to Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (*) regarding arrests without warrants and the necessity of justification:
*. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*): This case laid down guidelines for arrest and detention procedures, emphasizing the protection of arrestees' rights.

*. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (*): It mandates the registration of FIRs for cognizable offenses and discusses the procedure for arrests.
These cases focus on legal safeguards during arrests and emphasize the importance of following prescribed procedures. Would you like more information on any of these cases?

Case Rating: *
To further assist you, consider these points:
- D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (*): Focuses on the rights of arrestees and guidelines for arrest procedures.
- Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (*): Discusses FIR registration for cognizable offenses and arrest procedures.
These cases stress legal safeguards and procedures during arrests. Would you like any specific details or summaries of these cases?