Intoxilyzer 8000 Dui Challenge

Summary

In Florida, challenging a DUI charge can involve questioning the reliability of the Intoxilyzer 8000, especially if multiple attempts were needed to obtain a reading. Video evidence of the test and the officers failure to identify themselves in the report can strengthen the defense. Its important to review the devices calibration and maintenance records and ensure all procedural requirements were met during the arrest and testing process.

Full Conversation

Yes, my son had to blow almost * times before it got reading
It sounds like there might be concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the Intoxilyzer * in your son's situation. Equipment malfunction or improper use can be grounds for challenging the results.
Can you tell me if your son was charged with a DUI and if there were any witnesses to the multiple attempts?
Yes, he waas charged. There is video of two officers conducting the test
In Florida, the accuracy and reliability of the Intoxilyzer * are crucial for DUI cases. Your son's multiple attempts to provide a sample could be grounds for challenging the test results, especially if there's video evidence of potential mishandling.
- Equipment malfunction or improper use can be challenged in court.
- Proper calibration and maintenance records of the device should be checked.
Is there any other specific concern you have about the handling of the test or the arrest?
The officer conducting the test did not naame himself aand was not named in the police report
It seems there's a strong potential for challenging the DUI charge based on the multiple attempts and the officer's failure to identify themselves. Here are a few points to consider:
- Officers are required to identify themselves in reports.
- The accuracy and reliability of the Intoxilyzer * can be challenged.
- Video evidence can support your claims.
Was there any other procedural error you noticed during the arrest or test?