TRY ME!
Motion For Appropriate Relief
Summary
Joseph Gibson pleaded guilty to violating a protective order and faced multiple probation violations. Despite efforts to comply, he encountered issues beyond his control, such as jail overcapacity. Legal arguments include due process and equal protection violations. Relevant cases like State v. Hewett and State v. Miller support his compliance efforts. Gibson seeks relief through dismissal of probation violations.Full Conversation
please incorporate proper case law and by what juridiction this court will have over this case and why and please give a legal argument in favor of gibson
The jurisdiction of the Rockingham County Superior Court in North Carolina arises from the following:
- North Carolina General Statutes § 7A-*: Superior Court has jurisdiction for all criminal cases which do not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of another court.
- North Carolina General Statutes § 15A-*(b): Motion for appropriate relief can be made at any time after verdict per this statute.
Legal Argument in favor of Gibson:
- It could be argued that Gibson made every effort to comply with the court's orders and complete his sentence, as displayed in his attempt to serve the remaining two days.
- The refusal of the jail to accept him due to overcapacity, an issue beyond his control, should not constitute a violation of his probation.
- Furthermore, Gibson's attempts to communicate with his probation officer should be considered as evidence of his intention to comply with the court's orders.
- For the DUI charge, if it occurred after the termination date of his probation, it should not be a valid basis for probation violation.
Relevant cases:
- 'State v. Hewett': This case sets a precedent where the defendant's efforts to comply with probation conditions were considered by the court.
- 'State v. Miller': In this case, the court ruled that a
- North Carolina General Statutes § 7A-*: Superior Court has jurisdiction for all criminal cases which do not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of another court.
- North Carolina General Statutes § 15A-*(b): Motion for appropriate relief can be made at any time after verdict per this statute.
Legal Argument in favor of Gibson:
- It could be argued that Gibson made every effort to comply with the court's orders and complete his sentence, as displayed in his attempt to serve the remaining two days.
- The refusal of the jail to accept him due to overcapacity, an issue beyond his control, should not constitute a violation of his probation.
- Furthermore, Gibson's attempts to communicate with his probation officer should be considered as evidence of his intention to comply with the court's orders.
- For the DUI charge, if it occurred after the termination date of his probation, it should not be a valid basis for probation violation.
Relevant cases:
- 'State v. Hewett': This case sets a precedent where the defendant's efforts to comply with probation conditions were considered by the court.
- 'State v. Miller': In this case, the court ruled that a
what rights of gibsons were violated
Based on your information, the following rights of Gibson may have potentially been violated:
*. Right to due process: If Gibson's probation was violated without proper procedure.
*. Right to equal protection: If Gibson was treated unfairly compared to similar cases.
*. Right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment: If Gibson's severe head injury while in custody was due to negligence or ill-treatment.
*. Right to due process: If Gibson's probation was violated without proper procedure.
*. Right to equal protection: If Gibson was treated unfairly compared to similar cases.
*. Right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment: If Gibson's severe head injury while in custody was due to negligence or ill-treatment.
please incorporate this in the proper legal format in the motion and whatv relied should be granted and cite the rules and laws and case law so that this can be filed with the cleks office and accepted
**IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA**
**STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA**
**v.**
**JOSEPH GIBSON,**
**Defendant.**
**MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF**
COMES NOW, Defendant Joseph Gibson, and moves this Court for appropriate relief under Article * of the North Carolina General Statutes:
*. Gibson complied with orders, as evidenced by his attempt to serve the remaining two days (North Carolina General Statutes § 15A-*(b)).
*. His probation shouldn't be violated due to jail overcapacity, an issue beyond his control (State v. Hewett).
*. Gibson's efforts to communicate with his probation officer show intention to comply (State v. Miller).
*. If the DUI charge occurred after the termination date of his probation, it's not a valid basis for probation violation.
Gibson's rights potentially violated include due process, equal protection, and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment. He seeks relief through the dismissal of probation violations and protection of his rights.
---
Please note that this is a simplified example and may require further adjustments based on the specifics of the case and local court rules. It
**STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA**
**v.**
**JOSEPH GIBSON,**
**Defendant.**
**MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF**
COMES NOW, Defendant Joseph Gibson, and moves this Court for appropriate relief under Article * of the North Carolina General Statutes:
*. Gibson complied with orders, as evidenced by his attempt to serve the remaining two days (North Carolina General Statutes § 15A-*(b)).
*. His probation shouldn't be violated due to jail overcapacity, an issue beyond his control (State v. Hewett).
*. Gibson's efforts to communicate with his probation officer show intention to comply (State v. Miller).
*. If the DUI charge occurred after the termination date of his probation, it's not a valid basis for probation violation.
Gibson's rights potentially violated include due process, equal protection, and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment. He seeks relief through the dismissal of probation violations and protection of his rights.
---
Please note that this is a simplified example and may require further adjustments based on the specifics of the case and local court rules. It
Start a new chat