No Contact Order Search Limits

Summary

A no-contact order violation in Nevada does not automatically permit police to search premises. Police generally need probable cause and a warrant for such a search. Reasonable suspicion alone is insufficient for obtaining a search warrant. For specific legal advice, consulting a local attorney is recommended.

Full Conversation

if police have reasonable suspicion that two co-defendants that have a no contact order are together in the same premise, does that consitute enough for a warrant to search the premise
In California, reasonable suspicion alone is generally not enough for a search warrant. Police typically need:
- Probable cause that evidence of a crime is present.
- A warrant issued by a judge.
Reasonable suspicion might lead to further investigation but not directly to a warrant. Do you have more questions about this process?
This case is a nevada case #*, & #* If police think that the no contact order set by a judge for codendtes is being violated. In which the crime is violation of the no contact order
While I'm focused on California law, I can offer general insights. In most jurisdictions, including Nevada, a violation of a no-contact order doesn't automatically justify a search of premises. Police typically need probable cause and a warrant for a search. If you need more specific information about Nevada, it's best to consult a local attorney. Would you like assistance finding one?