Victim Age Discrepancy Argument

Summary

The legal argument focuses on the discrepancy between statutory language and case facts regarding the victims age. If the state cannot confirm the victim was a minor, it may not meet its burden of proof, potentially weakening their case. This argument could be strong, especially if the state certified no confirmed ages. Consulting a local attorney in Virginia for specific advice and case law is recommended.

Full Conversation

asking if this a winable argument
It sounds like you're dealing with a legal argument regarding the age of a victim and the burden of proof. Here's a general idea of your position:
- Your argument hinges on the discrepancy between the statutory language and the facts (no confirmed victim age).
- The state must prove the victim's age; if they can't, it weakens their case.
For specific advice or case law in Virginia, consulting a local attorney would be beneficial. Would you like assistance in finding local legal help?
the state certfied no confrim ages
It seems like you're dealing with a complex legal argument regarding the age of a victim where the state hasn't confirmed the victim's age. This could be a significant point in your case, as the burden of proof lies with the state. If they can't prove the victim's age, it could indeed weaken their position.
Would you like help connecting with a local attorney in Virginia who can provide more detailed advice on this matter?
question for you is my position defendable
Case Rating: *
Your position appears to be strong, particularly if the state cannot confirm the victim's age, which is crucial for meeting their burden of proof.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, could you provide more details about the issue?
argument for removal
Case Rating: *
It seems like you might have a strong case, especially if the state cannot confirm the victim's age. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If yes, could you provide more details about the issue?
Argument for Removal The plain language of ยง *.*-* must control. Since the state cannot prove the victim was a minor, the statutory bar cannot be applied. That makes you eligible for relief once the *-year compliance mark is satisfied.
Case Rating: *
Your argument seems strong, especially if the state cannot prove the victim's age. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, could you provide a bit more information about the issue?