Judge Ignored Suppression Motion

Summary

If a judge in Montana does not rule on a motion to suppress before conviction, it may be grounds for an appeal. Legally, judges must rule on such motions before trial. If they dont, it could be considered a legal error. Appeals can be based on these errors, and not ruling on a suppression motion might qualify. Consult a local attorney to discuss the specifics of your case and the potential for a successful appeal.

Full Conversation

What would be the result if the judge did not rule on a motion to suppress
Hello ****, if a judge doesn't rule on a motion to suppress, it typically means that the motion is still under consideration. However, the specifics could vary based on your location. Could you please share that information with me?
Montana the judge never made a decision on my motion to suppress and then convicted me and gave me five years probation
Hello ****, if a judge in Montana does not rule on a motion to suppress before conviction, you may have grounds for appeal.
Key points:
- Legally, the judge must rule on such motions before trial.
- If they don't, it could be considered an error.
- Consult a local attorney to discuss appeal options.
I have an appeal in the court
That's great ****, you're on the right path. Do you need information on the appeal process in Montana or any other specific details regarding your appeal?
I'm just wondering if my appeal. Has any merit due to the fact that I was never given a motion to suppress hearing before my conviction
Hello ****, if in Montana a motion to suppress wasn't ruled on before your conviction, your appeal may indeed hold merit. Consult a local attorney for specifics.
Key Points:
- Appeals can be based on legal errors.
- Not ruling on a suppression motion might be a legal error.
- An attorney can advise on your specific case.