Summary
In Nevada, police generally require a warrant for searches, but exceptions like exigent circumstances or consent may apply. The hot pursuit exception allows entry without a warrant if actively chasing a suspect. However, if you were not pursued from public to private, this might not apply. Tracking with an AirTag is typically not considered probable cause for a warrantless search. Consider consulting a local attorney for personalized advice on your situation.Full Conversation
If police had footage of a crime but no warrant
Hey ****, it sounds like you're curious about the legality of using evidence obtained without a warrant. Here are some general points about this situation in Nevada:
- The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, typically requiring a warrant.
- Evidence obtained without a warrant might be inadmissible in court unless exceptions apply, like exigent circumstances or consent.
Do you want to know more about these exceptions?
Does police seeing footage of crime give them the rights to violate my rights without a warrant
Hey ****, in Nevada, the police can't violate your rights without a warrant just because they have footage of a crime. However, there are exceptions like exigent circumstances or consent where they might act without a warrant. Would you like more details on these exceptions?
Yes
Case Rating: *
In Nevada, certain exceptions allow police to act without a warrant:
- Exigent Circumstances: If there's an immediate threat to safety or risk of evidence destruction.
- Consent: If someone with authority consents to a search.
If you need further clarification, feel free to ask!
There trying to say the had been in hot pursuit but I was at home they never chased me from public to private
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it sounds like the police are claiming a "hot pursuit" exception, which typically allows them to enter private property without a warrant if they're actively chasing a suspect. However, if you were at home and not pursued from public to private, this might not apply. Do you want to discuss any specific details about the situation?
They said a airtag gave accurate location which it does not and in Nevada airtag not probably cause
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, in Nevada, merely tracking a location with an AirTag is generally not considered probable cause for a warrantless search. However, the specific circumstances of your case might affect this interpretation. Would you like to discuss any further details or have questions about your situation?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat