Dwi Defense Legal Strategies

Summary

Your case involves a DWI arrest in Pennsylvania, where the officer admitted the smell was raw cannabis, not burnt, and the substance found was untested. As a medical marijuana patient, your legal use of raw cannabis could be a key defense. The lack of testing and the officers admission weaken the prosecutions case. Your attorney seems to be effectively addressing these issues, which could lead to dismissal or a favorable outcome. Continue working closely with your lawyer to navigate the pretrial process and build a strong defense.

Full Conversation

Was it good he brought up the testing before pre trail
Yes, bringing up the lack of testing before pre-trial was likely a smart move. It highlights potential weaknesses in the prosecution's evidence. If the substance wasn’t tested, it could make it harder for them to prove impairment or possession beyond a reasonable doubt. Your attorney seems to be on top of it.
If it comes back nothing if they can’t test it how would it play out
If the substance can't be tested or comes back as not containing THC, it could significantly weaken the prosecution's case. Without proof the substance was marijuana, it would be harder to argue impairment or possession. Your lawyer could push for dismissal or negotiate a favorable outcome.
DUI court in Lancaster Pa they really not used to lawyers fighting my frist court date they wanted me to plea without no discovery no test results they crazy
Case Rating: *
Your case seems to have strong potential, especially with the lack of evidence and your status as a medical marijuana patient. It’s good that your attorney is actively challenging the evidence. The officer’s admission and the untested substance are key weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Continue working closely with your lawyer. Do you have any specific concerns about the pretrial process?
My attorney Jeremy Alva do ya homework on him he the best
Case Rating: *
Your attorney seems to be handling the case effectively, especially by challenging evidence and questioning the officer's statements. The lack of testing and the officer's admission about raw cannabis could play to your advantage. If you have concerns about the pretrial process or specific legal procedures, feel free to ask!
Is he good
Case Rating: *
From the details you shared, it sounds like Jeremy Alva is effectively addressing key weaknesses in the prosecution's case. His focus on evidence gaps, like the lack of testing or proof of impairment, indicates strong advocacy. If you're comfortable with his approach and progress, he seems to be doing well.
Do ya search on him
Case Rating: *
I can’t conduct a search on individuals, including attorneys. If you’re looking for attorney reviews, consider checking the Pennsylvania Bar Association or online review platforms like Avvo or Martindale.
Yes
Case Rating: *
Your attorney seems to be managing the case well, focusing on evidence gaps and legal arguments. If you’re confident in his strategy and approach, it’s a good sign. Do you have any other concerns about your case or the pretrial process?