Minors Unintentional Content Encounter

Summary

A 15-year-old unintentionally encountered non-sexual content with inappropriate comments on a forum. Now 20, understanding New Jerseys legal implications is crucial. Lack of intent and non-interaction with the content are significant factors. Consulting a local attorney can provide guidance on the best course of action.

Full Conversation

Hi, I’m going over a possible case. The person in question was * at the time. He found himself on a clear web, pornography forum. He stumbled on a post with photo of someone under the age of *. The photo itself was not sexual and had zero sexual conduct but the messages from users comments were sexual. The 15 year old had no intent to see this content. He is * currently.
Hey ****! It sounds like a complicated situation. Since the individual was a minor at the time and did not intend to encounter the content, it's important to understand the legal implications. Here are a few key points to consider in the District of Columbia:
- Intent: Lack of intent to view illegal content can be a significant factor.
- Age: Being a minor at the time may influence the legal perspective.
- Nature of Content: The fact that the photo was not sexual in nature is important.
Would you like more detailed information, or do you prefer to be connected to a local lawyer for further assistance?
This was in NJ
Got it, ****. Since this situation happened in New Jersey, the legal considerations may vary slightly. Here are a few key points:
- Intent: Lack of intent to view illegal content can be a significant factor.
- Age: Being a minor at the time can influence the legal perspective.
- Nature of Content: The non-sexual nature of the photo is important.
Would you prefer to get connected to a local lawyer in New Jersey who can assist you further with this case?
Assist me further
Case Rating: *
Hi ****! Given the situation, it might be beneficial to consult a lawyer to understand the specific legal implications in New Jersey, especially to ensure the best course of action for the individual in question. Here are a few more details:
- The individual's current age (*) means that they are an adult now.
- The lack of intent and non-sexual nature of the photo could be favorable.
Would you like to proceed with getting connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with this case?
Assist me more
Case Rating: *
This seems like a significant case due to the involvement of a minor and the legal implications of the content viewed. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
The 15 year old at the time did not interact with the content (ie commenting, sharing, liking) nor did he save it ever just stumbled across it
Case Rating: *
****, based on the information provided, it seems like the individual did not intentionally engage with the content, which is a crucial aspect. Here are a few additional points to consider:
- The individual did not interact, share, like, or save the content.
- The content itself was not sexual, and the comments were external.
Would you like more detailed information on this, or any specific guidance on how to proceed further?