Strickland Rule Explained Clearly

Summary

The Strickland rule, from the 1984 Supreme Court case Strickland v. Washington, establishes criteria for ineffective assistance of counsel claims. It involves two prongs: performance, where the defendant must show counsels performance was deficient, and prejudice, where the defendant must demonstrate that this deficiency affected the trials outcome. In California, proving ineffective assistance can be complex, and consulting a local attorney is advisable for case-specific guidance.

Full Conversation

Ca
Under the Strickland rule, demonstrating ineffective assistance of counsel can be complex.
If you're considering taking action based on ineffective counsel in California, you might want to consult a local attorney to evaluate the specifics of your case.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this in California?