Judicial Conduct Concerns Raised

Case Rating: *
To list the evidence concerning Mr. Chuck Traylor on two separate instances, you can use the following format:
---
Evidence Listing: Mr. Chuck Traylor
*. Instance *: Opposing Counsel's Submission of Evidence Without Proper Notification
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Opposing counsel submitted evidence without proper notification to my attorney.
- Evidence:
- Email communication [Attach email correspondence showing lack of notification].
- Court documents [Attach documents submitted by opposing counsel without notice].
- Testimony [Include any statements or affidavits from witnesses].
*. Instance *: Recommendation Made Before Transcript Was Ready
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Mr. Chuck Traylor made his recommendation to the judge before the transcript was ready. The timeline suggests it was impossible for him to review all documents thoroughly within one day.
- Evidence:
- Court transcript request and readiness dates [Attach documents showing dates].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters between parties].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with multiple legal issues, including concerns about judicial conduct and opposing counsel's actions. Here are some steps you can take:
- Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all communications, submissions, and responses.
- File a Complaint: If you believe the conduct of any legal professional was inappropriate, you can file complaints with the relevant oversight bodies.
If you have more specific details or questions, feel free to ask!

Case Rating: *
It sounds like you are dealing with a complex situation involving judicial conduct, opposing counsel's actions, and concerns about the handling of evidence and recommendations. Here is an updated example of listing evidence regarding Mr. Chuck Traylor:
---
Evidence Listing: Mr. Chuck Traylor
*. Instance *: Opposing Counsel's Submission of Evidence Without Proper Notification
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Opposing counsel submitted evidence without proper notification to my attorney.
- Evidence:
- Email communication [Attach email correspondence showing lack of notification].
- Court documents [Attach documents submitted by opposing counsel without notice].
- Testimony [Include any statements or affidavits from witnesses].
*. Instance *: Recommendation Made Before Transcript Was Ready
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Mr. Chuck Traylor made his recommendation to the judge before the transcript was ready. The timeline suggests it was impossible for him to review all documents thoroughly within one day.
- Evidence:
- Court transcript request and readiness dates [Attach documents showing dates].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters between parties].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
*. Instance *: Contempt of Court Filing
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: After informing Mr. Traylor that I did not believe opposing counsel had submitted a contempt of court filing that had actually been filed.
- Evidence:
- Court filings [Attach documents showing the contempt of court filing].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters related to the filing].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
---
Would you like any further assistance with this issue?

Case Rating: *
To address your concerns regarding Mr. Chuck Traylor, you can add the following details to your draft complaint letter:
---
Kelly Griffin
Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Louisiana Judiciary Commission
* Royal Street, Suite *
New Orleans, LA *
Subject: Complaint Against Judge Wilson Rambo
Dear Members of the Louisiana Judiciary Commission,
I am writing to formally file a complaint against Judge Wilson Rambo, who presided over my pre-trial hearing on [Date] at the Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court in [City], Louisiana. During the hearing, I witnessed conduct that I believe was unprofessional and biased, which I am outlining below.
*. Opening Statement: Judge Wilson Rambo began the hearing by stating, “wee, I don’t know what the hell thais means,” referring to my attorney's objection. This statement was inappropriate and unprofessional, setting a concerning tone for the proceedings.
*. Ignoring Evidence: Despite having the record in front of him, Judge Rambo claimed to be unaware of the * pages of emails documenting my evidence. This neglect suggests a lack of diligence and impartiality.
*. Refusal to Review File: During the hearing, Judge Rambo refused to look at the file in front of him, which contained crucial information for the case. This refusal appeared to undermine the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Custody Determination: I was forced to determine child custody under these stressful and biased conditions, which I believe unfairly impacted the outcome of the case.
*. Pre-trial Conference: Before the scheduled pre-trial conference on September *, *, I had contacted Mrs. Cathy Russell, Judge Rambo’s assistant, to confirm he had knowledge of the two emails I sent to him and opposing counsel the prior summer in *. I was told he read over the record the morning of the hearing. I went on to ask if she herself had read my two emails explaining why my case was taking so long and the experiences I was having finding someone to actually represent me.
*. Order to Dismiss Objections: Opposing counsel submitted an order to dismiss all objections, claiming they were stated in court, which was not the case as the acquired transcript shows. I don't understand why Judge Rambo would sign something that he never said. I opposed but lost.
*. Evidence Listing: Mr. Chuck Traylor:
- Instance *: Opposing Counsel's Submission of Evidence Without Proper Notification
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Opposing counsel submitted evidence without proper notification to my attorney.
- Evidence:
- Email communication [Attach email correspondence showing lack of notification].
- Court documents [Attach documents submitted by opposing counsel without notice].
- Testimony [Include any statements or affidavits from witnesses].
- Instance *: Recommendation Made Before Transcript Was Ready
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Mr. Chuck Traylor made his recommendation to the judge before the transcript was ready. The timeline suggests it was impossible for him to review all documents thoroughly within one day.
- Evidence:
- Court transcript request and readiness dates [Attach documents showing dates].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters between parties].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
- Instance *: Contempt of Court Filing
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: After informing Mr. Traylor that I did not believe opposing counsel had submitted a contempt of court that had actually been filed, Mr. Traylor [complete with details of his actions].
I have enclosed copies of the relevant documents and evidence, including the * pages of emails, which substantiate my claims.
I respectfully request that the Louisiana Judiciary Commission investigate this matter thoroughly to ensure that the conduct of Judge Rambo aligns with the standards expected of the judiciary. I believe this investigation will help uphold the integrity of the judicial system and ensure fair and impartial proceedings for all parties involved.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,
Kelly Griffin
---
Make sure to personalize the letter with your address, city, state, ZIP code, email address, and phone number.

Case Rating: *
Given the complexity and the number of issues you're dealing with, it might be beneficial to seek legal advice. Here’s how you can add the latest details to your draft:
---
Kelly Griffin
Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Louisiana Judiciary Commission
* Royal Street, Suite *
New Orleans, LA *
Subject: Complaint Against Judge Wilson Rambo
Dear Members of the Louisiana Judiciary Commission,
I am writing to formally file a complaint against Judge Wilson Rambo, who presided over my pre-trial hearing on [Date] at the Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court in [City], Louisiana. During the hearing, I witnessed conduct that I believe was unprofessional and biased, which I am outlining below.
*. Opening Statement: Judge Wilson Rambo began the hearing by stating, “wee, I don’t know what the hell this means,” referring to my attorney's objection. This statement was inappropriate and unprofessional, setting a concerning tone for the proceedings.
*. Ignoring Evidence: Despite having the record in front of him, Judge Rambo claimed to be unaware of the * pages of emails documenting my evidence. This neglect suggests a lack of diligence and impartiality.
*. Refusal to Review File: During the hearing, Judge Rambo refused to look at the file in front of him, which contained crucial information for the case. This refusal appeared to undermine the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Custody Determination: I was forced to determine child custody under these stressful and biased conditions, which I believe unfairly impacted the outcome of the case.
*. Pre-trial Conference: Before the scheduled pre-trial conference on September *, *, I had contacted Mrs. Cathy Russell, Judge Rambo’s assistant, to confirm he had knowledge of the two emails I sent to him and opposing counsel the prior summer in *. I was told he read over the record the morning of the hearing. I went on to ask if she herself had read my two emails explaining why my case was taking so long and the experiences I was having finding someone to actually represent me.
*. Order to Dismiss Objections: Opposing counsel submitted an order to dismiss all objections, claiming they were stated in court, which was not the case as the acquired transcript shows. I don't understand why Judge Rambo would sign something that he never said. I opposed but lost.
*. Evidence Listing: Mr. Chuck Traylor:
- Instance *: Opposing Counsel's Submission of Evidence Without Proper Notification:
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Opposing counsel submitted evidence without proper notification to my attorney.
- Evidence:
- Email communication [Attach email correspondence showing lack of notification].
- Court documents [Attach documents submitted by opposing counsel without notice].
- Testimony [Include any statements or affidavits from witnesses].
- Instance *: Recommendation Made Before Transcript Was Ready:
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Mr. Chuck Traylor made his recommendation to the judge before the transcript was ready. The timeline suggests it was impossible for him to review all documents thoroughly within one day.
- Evidence:
- Court transcript request and readiness dates [Attach documents showing dates].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters between parties].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
- Instance *: Contempt of Court Filing:
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: After informing Mr. Traylor that I did not believe opposing counsel had submitted a contempt of court that had actually been filed, Mr. Traylor made excuses for opposing counsel submitting copies of contempt of court she had not filed. It took * weeks to be generated from the clerk's office but dated to a date she claims she had not filed them yet. She claimed they were a courtesy copy.
- Evidence:
- Court filings [Attach documents showing the contempt of court filing].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters related to the filing].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
I have enclosed copies of the relevant documents and evidence, including the * pages of emails, which substantiate my claims.
I respectfully request that the Louisiana Judiciary Commission investigate this matter thoroughly to ensure that the conduct of Judge Rambo aligns with the standards expected of the judiciary. I believe this investigation will help uphold the integrity of the judicial system and ensure fair and impartial proceedings for all parties involved.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,
Kelly Griffin
---
Would you like further assistance with this matter?

Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here is the updated letter incorporating your latest details:
---
Kelly Griffin
Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
Louisiana Judiciary Commission
* Royal Street, Suite *
New Orleans, LA *
Subject: Complaint Against Judge Wilson Rambo
Dear Members of the Louisiana Judiciary Commission,
I am writing to formally file a complaint against Judge Wilson Rambo, who presided over my pre-trial hearing on [Date] at the Ouachita Parish Fourth Judicial Court in [City], Louisiana. During the hearing, I witnessed conduct that I believe was unprofessional and biased, which I am outlining below.
*. Opening Statement: Judge Wilson Rambo began the hearing by stating, “wee, I don’t know what the hell thais means,” referring to my attorney's objection. This statement was inappropriate and unprofessional, setting a concerning tone for the proceedings.
*. Ignoring Evidence: Despite having the record in front of him, Judge Rambo claimed to be unaware of the * pages of emails documenting my evidence. This neglect suggests a lack of diligence and impartiality.
*. Refusal to Review File: During the hearing, Judge Rambo refused to look at the file in front of him, which contained crucial information for the case. This refusal appeared to undermine the integrity of the judicial process.
*. Custody Determination: I was forced to determine child custody under these stressful and biased conditions, which I believe unfairly impacted the outcome of the case.
*. Pre-trial Conference: Before the scheduled pre-trial conference on September *, *, I had contacted Mrs. Cathy Russell, Judge Rambo’s assistant, to confirm he had knowledge of the two emails I sent to him and opposing counsel the prior summer in *. I was told he read over the record the morning of the hearing. I went on to ask if she herself had read my two emails explaining why my case was taking so long and the experiences I was having finding someone to actually represent me.
*. Order to Dismiss Objections: Opposing counsel submitted an order to dismiss all objections, claiming they were stated in court, which was not the case as the acquired transcript shows. I don't understand why Judge Rambo would sign something that he never said. I opposed but lost.
*. Evidence Listing: Mr. Chuck Traylor:
- Instance *: Opposing Counsel's Submission of Evidence Without Proper Notification
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Opposing counsel submitted evidence without proper notification to my attorney.
- Evidence:
- Email communication [Attach email correspondence showing lack of notification].
- Court documents [Attach documents submitted by opposing counsel without notice].
- Testimony [Include any statements or affidavits from witnesses].
- Instance *: Recommendation Made Before Transcript Was Ready
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: Mr. Chuck Traylor made his recommendation to the judge before the transcript was ready. The timeline suggests it was impossible for him to review all documents thoroughly within one day.
- Evidence:
- Court transcript request and readiness dates [Attach documents showing dates].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters between parties].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
- Instance *: Contempt of Court Filing
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Description: After informing Mr. Traylor that I did not believe opposing counsel had submitted a contempt of court that had actually been filed, Mr. Traylor made excuses for opposing counsel submitting copies of contempt of court she had not filed. It took * weeks to be generated from the clerk's office but dated to a date she claims she had not filed them yet. She claims they were a courtesy copy.
- Evidence:
- Court filings [Attach documents showing the contempt of court filing].
- Correspondence [Attach any emails or letters related to the filing].
- Statements [Include any relevant statements made by Mr. Traylor or others].
I have enclosed copies of the relevant documents and evidence, including the * pages of emails, which substantiate my claims.
I respectfully request that the Louisiana Judiciary Commission investigate this matter thoroughly to ensure that the conduct of Judge Rambo aligns with the standards expected of the judiciary. I believe this investigation will help uphold the integrity of the judicial system and ensure fair and impartial proceedings for all parties involved.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,
Kelly Griffin
---
Make sure to personalize the letter with your address, city, state, ZIP code, email address, and phone number.