Claiming Damages For Fence

Summary

Perrin can initiate a claim for RM3000 in damages at the Magistrates Court, which handles claims up to RM100,000. For smaller claims, the Small Claims Tribunal is a viable option, offering a simpler process. Perrin should gather evidence, including photos, communications, and land use documents. If the situation escalates, an interlocutory injunction can be sought to prevent further damage. Supporting documents like expert opinions and legal notices are crucial. The Rules of Court 2012 provide guidance on timelines and procedures for such applications. Consider consulting a lawyer for detailed advice and to ensure compliance with legal requirements.

Full Conversation

A matter has been brough to you by Perrin, who wishes to claim RM3000 in damages for destruction to his home fence by his neighbour. He has asked his neighbour, Sombong Farm Sdn Bhd (“SF”), to cease and desist farming on his neighbours land close to his land or take mitigative drainage construction on the SF’s property. The land is gazetted by the State and Municipal Authority for residential purposes. SF has ignored Perrin’s requests. The water flow from SF’s land has been the cause of the damage to Perrin’s fence as the soggy soil cause the fence poles to shift and collapse. a) Where would Perrin initiate an action to claim the damages owed ?
Leo, Perrin can initiate an action to claim the RM3000 in damages at the Magistrates' Court, as it handles claims up to RM100,*. He should gather all evidence of the damage and any communication with Sombong Farm Sdn Bhd regarding the issue.
Would you like to know more about the specific process or necessary documentation?
tell me more about the claim
Leo, here's a brief overview of how Perrin can proceed with his claim:
- Jurisdiction: As mentioned, the Magistrates' Court handles claims up to RM100,*.
- Evidence: Perrin should gather:
- Photos of the damaged fence and the soggy soil.
- Any communication with SF about the issue.
- Relevant documents showing the land is gazetted for residential use.
Would you like details on filing the claim or advice on gathering evidence?
it is only rm *
For a claim of RM3000, Perrin can still proceed with the Magistrates' Court. Here are the steps:
- Filing the Claim: Perrin will need to fill out a claim form which can be obtained from the Magistrates' Court.
- Documentation: Include all gathered evidence and communications.
- Filing Fee: There will be a small fee for filing the claim.
Would you like more details on the filing process or assistance with preparing the documents?
isnt it better for small claim tribunal
Case Rating: *
Leo, for a claim of RM3000, the Small Claims Tribunal could be a better option as it is designed for simpler, quicker resolutions without the need for legal representation. Here's a quick overview:
- Limit: Handles claims up to RM5,*.
- Process: Less formal than court.
- Cost: Lower filing fees.
Would you like details on how to proceed with the Small Claims Tribunal?
Perrin calls you 5 days after the first Case Management and tells you that SF is continuing its farming activities but has increased irrigation due to dry weather. Water outflow to Perrin’s land has increased which increased the soil erosion at the fence and some water has begun to erode his house foundation. Perrin’s house lies * meters away from the fence where the earlier repaired damage occurred. Perrin worries that his house may be damaged or flooded.
Leo, Perrin's situation has escalated and now involves potential damage to his house foundation. This increases the severity of the case. Here's what he can do next:
- Evidence: Gather new photos and videos showing the increased water outflow and its effects on the soil and foundation.
- Expert Opinion: Consider getting a structural engineer to assess potential damage to the house foundation.
- Legal Advice: Given the increased risk and potential higher damages, consulting a lawyer might be prudent.
Would you like more information on how to document the new damage or how to escalate this matter legally?
Advise Perrin on what action he can take to mitigate or prevent such damage at this stage ?
Hey Leo, Perrin should take the following steps to mitigate or prevent further damage:
- Temporary Barriers: Install temporary barriers or drainage solutions to redirect water flow away from the fence and house.
- Legal Notice: Send a formal legal notice to SF, demanding immediate action to prevent further damage.
- Expert Consultation: Hire a structural engineer to suggest immediate protective measures for the foundation.
Would you like more details on how to send a legal notice or other immediate actions?
how about interlocutory application for this case to mitigate damages
Hey Leo, an interlocutory application can indeed be a useful step to mitigate further damages. Here’s what Perrin should consider:
- Interlocutory Injunction: This is a temporary court order requiring SF to stop the harmful activities until the full case is resolved.
- Urgency: Highlight the immediate risk to Perrin's property.
- Evidence: Provide the recent documentation and expert opinion.
Would you like more details on filing an interlocutory injunction?
tell me about Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors (*) * MLJ *
Hey Leo, here's a summary of the case *Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors (*) * MLJ **:
- Parties Involved: Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd, QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd, and other defendants.
- Issue: Dispute over alleged breach of contract and claims of damages.
- Decision: The court examined whether there was a valid contract and if the breach occurred, leading to damages.
Would you like more detailed information on the court’s reasoning or the specific legal principles applied?
what is the obiter dicta and ratio decidendi
Hey Leo, here’s a quick rundown on *obiter dicta* and *ratio decidendi*:
- Ratio Decidendi: The legal principle or rule that the court's decision is based on. It's binding in future cases.
- Obiter Dicta: Comments or observations made by the judge that are not essential to the decision. These are not binding but can be persuasive.
Would you like to know how these concepts applied in the *Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd* case?
what is the obiter dicta and ratio decidendi for the case of Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors (*) * MLJ *
Case Rating: *
Hey Leo, here’s a concise summary for *Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors (*) * MLJ **:
- Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the finding that a valid contract existed and that QAV Technologies breached its terms, resulting in damages to Pentamaster.
- Obiter Dicta: The judge made observations on the importance of clear contractual terms and the necessity of maintaining proper communication channels in business agreements, which although not essential to the decision, provide valuable insights for future cases.
Would you like more details on how these aspects impacted the case resolution?
Perrin calls you 5 days after the first Case Management and tells you that SF is continuing its farming activities but has increased irrigation due to dry weather. Water outflow to Perrin’s land has increased which increased the soil erosion at the fence and some water has begun to erode his house foundation. Perrin’s house lies * meters away from the fence where the earlier repaired damage occurred. Perrin worries that his house may be damaged or flooded.
Hey Leo, considering the urgency of Perrin's situation, he should:
- Interlocutory Injunction: File for an interlocutory injunction to temporarily stop SF's activities.
- Temporary Measures: Install barriers to redirect water flow.
- Expert Assessment: Get a structural engineer to assess and recommend protective measures.
Would you like more detailed guidance on filing the interlocutory injunction?
Advise Perrin on what action in interlocutory application that he can take to mitigate or prevent such damage at this stage?
Hey Leo, Perrin can take the following steps in an interlocutory application to mitigate or prevent further damage:
- Interlocutory Injunction: Seek a temporary court order to stop SF's harmful activities immediately.
- Urgency: Emphasize the immediate risk to Perrin's house foundation.
- Evidence Submission: Include recent photos, videos, and expert opinions.
Would you like more details on preparing the application?
elaborate more on the action
Hey Leo, here's a more detailed look at the steps Perrin can take in an interlocutory application to mitigate or prevent further damage:
Interlocutory Injunction:
*. Application Filing:
- Perrin needs to file an interlocutory injunction application with the court, requesting an urgent hearing due to the immediate risk of further damage.
*. Supporting Affidavit:
- Attach a detailed affidavit outlining the situation, including:
- The history of the issue with SF and previous attempts to resolve it.
- Description of the increased water outflow and its impact on Perrin's property.
- Potential risks to the house foundation.
*. Evidence Submission:
- Include all gathered evidence:
- Photos and Videos: Clear images and videos showing the current state of the fence, soggy soil, and any signs of erosion near the house.
- Communication Records: Any written or recorded communications with SF.
- Expert Opinions: Reports from structural engineers or other experts on the potential damage to the house foundation and necessary mitigation measures.
*. Urgency Emphasis:
- Stress the urgency of the situation in the application, highlighting the immediate need for the injunction to prevent further irreparable damage.
Temporary Measures:
*. Temporary Barriers:
- Install temporary barriers or drainage solutions to redirect water away from the fence and house. This might include sandbags, trenches, or other temporary water diversion methods.
*. Expert Consultation:
- Hire a structural engineer to provide immediate protective measures for the house foundation. This might involve temporary shoring or other stabilization techniques.
Legal Notice:
*. Formal Notice:
- Send a formal legal notice to SF, demanding immediate cessation of the activities causing the water outflow and outlining the legal actions Perrin is prepared to take if they do not comply.
Would you like assistance with drafting the legal notice or more details on preparing the interlocutory injunction application?
yes please...elaborate more on formal notice
Hey Leo, here’s how Perrin can proceed with sending a formal legal notice to SF:
Formal Legal Notice:
*. Header Information:
- Perrin’s name and address.
- SF’s name and address.
- Date of notice.
*. Introduction:
- State that this is a formal legal notice.
- Briefly describe the relationship between Perrin and SF.
*. Statement of Facts:
- Detail the history of Perrin’s complaints and SF’s farming activities.
- Describe the damage caused by the increased water outflow.
*. Legal Grounds:
- Cite relevant laws or regulations that SF is violating (e.g., land use regulations for residential areas).
*. Demand for Action:
- Clearly state the actions Perrin demands from SF (e.g., cease farming activities, implement drainage solutions).
- Provide a reasonable deadline for compliance (e.g., 14 days).
*. Consequences of Non-Compliance:
- Warn that failure to comply will result in legal action, including seeking an interlocutory injunction and claiming further damages.
*. Signature:
- Perrin’s signature.
Would you like adetailed template for the formal notice or assistance with any specific section?
(b)Discuss how you would achieve this and what prayers would you seek should you file interlocutory applications for Perrin?
Hey Leo, here's how Perrin can proceed with filing interlocutory applications and the prayers he should seek:
Achieving Interlocutory Relief:
*. Application Filing:
- File an interlocutory application in the Magistrates' Court requesting an urgent hearing.

*. Supporting Affidavit:
- Attach a detailed affidavit outlining:
- History of the issue with SF.
- Increased water outflow and impact on Perrin's property.
- Potential risks to the house foundation.
*. Evidence Submission:
- Include photos, videos, communication records with SF, and expert opinions from structural engineers.
*. Urgency Emphasis:
- Highlight the immediate need for the injunction to prevent further irreparable damage.
Prayers to Seek in Interlocutory Applications:
*. Interlocutory Injunction:
- Temporary court order requiring SF to stop farming activities causing water outflow until the full case is resolved.
*. Preventive Measures:
- Order SF to take immediate corrective actions like installing proper drainage systems to prevent further damage.
*. Costs:
- Request that SF bears the costs of the interlocutory applicationWould you like more detailed guidance on the specific prayers or how to structure the affidavit for the interlocutory application?
yes please, more detailed guidance on the specific prayers or how to structure the affidavit for the interlocutory application?
Hey Leo, here's a detailed guide on the specific prayers and structuring the affidavit for the interlocutory application:
Prayers to Seek in Interlocutory Applications:
*. Interlocutory Injunction:
- A temporary court order requiring SF to cease farming activities causing water outflow until the full case is resolved.

*. Preventive Measures:
- An order directing SF to implement immediate drainage solutions to prevent further damage to Perrin's property.

*. Costs:
- Request that SF bears the costs of the interlocutory application and any additional expenses incurred by Perrin due to the urgency of the situation.
Structuring the Affidavit:
*. Introduction:
- Your name and relationship to the case.
- Briefly state the purpose of the affidavit (seeking interlocutory relief).
*. Background:
- Outline the history of the dispute with SF, including previous attempts to resolve the issue.
- Describe the farming activities and water outflow causing damage to Perrin's property.
*. Current Situation:
- Detail the recent increase in water outflow and its impact on the fence and house foundation.
- - Include observations and any immediate risks to the property.
*. Evidence:
- Attach and refer to photos and videos showing the current state of the fence, soggy soil, and damage near the house.
- Include communication records with SF detailing attempts to resolve the issue.
- Attach expert opinions from structural engineers or other professionals.
*. Urgency:
- Emphasize the immediate and irreparable harm that will occur if the court does not grant the injunction.
- Highlight any recent developments that have exacerbated the situation.
*. Prayers:
- Clearly state the interlocutory injunction you are seeking:
- Cease farming activities causing water outflow.
- Implement drainage solutions to prevent further damage.
- Cover costs related to the application and any protective measures.
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize the need for the court's urgent intervention to prevent further damage.
- Reiterate the specific prayers you are seeking from the court.
Would you like a sample template for the affidavit or more details on any specific section?
how about Mareva Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders, is it applicacle and usable for that case?
Hey Leo, Mareva Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders are quite specific legal tools, and here's how they might apply to Perrin's case:
Mareva Injunction:
- Purpose: To freeze SF’s assets to prevent them from disposing of or hiding assets that could satisfy a future judgment.
- Applicability: This might be more relevant if there’s a risk SF will dispose of assets to avoid paying damages.
Anton Piller Order:
- Purpose: To allow Perrin to enter SF’s premises to secure evidence that might be destroyed.
- Applicability: Useful if there’s concern SF will destroy evidence related to the water outflow or farming activities.
Would you like more detailed guidance on how Perrin can apply for these orders?
yes, more detailed guidance on how Perrin can apply for these orders
Hey Leo, here's a detailed guide on how Perrin can apply for Mareva Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders:
Mareva Injunction:
*. Purpose:
- To freeze SF’s assets to prevent them from being disposed of or hidden.
*. Application Process:
- File an Application: Submit an application to the court requesting the Mareva Injunction.
- Supporting Affidavit: Attach an affidavit detailing:
- The risk that SF may dispose of assets.
- Evidence of SF's assets that need to be frozen.
- Justification of why freezing these assets is crucial to secure the judgment.
- Urgency and Risk: Emphasize the urgency and risk of asset dissipation.
- Legal Grounds: Cite relevant legal provisions and cases supporting your application.
*. Evidence:
- Financial records or documents showing SF’s assets.
- Any indications or actions by SF suggesting they might dispose of assets.
Anton Piller Order:
*. Purpose:
- To allow Perrin to enter SF’s premises to secure evidence at risk of destruction.
*. Application Process:
- File an Application: Submit an application to the court for the Anton Piller Order.
-
Supporting Affidavit: Attach an affidavit detailing:
- Reasons to believe that SF may destroy crucial evidence.
- Specific evidence sought and its relevance to the case.
- Assurance that the search will be conducted respectfully and without causing undue harm.
-
Urgency and Risk: Emphasize the immediate risk of evidence destruction.
-
Legal Grounds: Cite relevant legal provisions and cases supporting your application.
*.
Evidence:
- Any communications or actions by SF suggesting they might destroy evidence.
- Expert opinions on the importance of the evidence to the case.
Sample Structure for Affidavit:
*.
Introduction:
- State your name, relationship to the case, and the purpose of the affidavit.
*.
Background:
- Outline the history of the dispute with SF, including prior attempts to resolve the issue.
*.
Current Situation:
- Describe the recent increase in water outflow and its impact on Perrin's property.
*.
Evidence**:
- Attach and refer to photos, videos, and communication records.
- Include financial records for Mareva Injunction.
- Detail specific
(c)Discuss the relevant undertakings that may have to be given by Perrin in an affidavit in support of such interlocutory application, explain the impact of this to Perrin?
Case Rating: *
Hey Leo, here are the relevant undertakings Perrin may need to give in an affidavit supporting an interlocutory application and their potential impact:
Relevant Undertakings:
*. Undertaking as to Damages:
- Perrin must promise to compensate SF for any losses suffered due to the injunction if it’s later found to be unjustified.
*. Disclosure of Material Facts:
- Provide a full and frank disclosure of all relevant facts, including any that may not favor Perrin's application.
*. Prompt Action:
- Undertake to act promptly and diligently in pursuing the main case to ensure the temporary relief is justified.
Impact on Perrin:
- Financial Risk:
- Perrin may be required to pay compensation to SF if the court later decides the injunction was unwarranted.

- Legal Responsibility:
- Failing to fully disclose all relevant information can lead to the injunction being set aside and potential penalties.

- Expedited Proceedings:
- Perrin must be prepared for a quicker timeline in the main proceedings, which may require additional resources and effort.
Would you like a sample structure for the affidavit or more details on any specific undertaking?Case Rating: *
Hey Leo, here are the relevant undertakings Perrin may need to give in an affidavit supporting an interlocutory application and their potential impact:
Relevant Undertakings:
*. Undertaking as to Damages:
- Perrin must promise to compensate SF for any losses suffered due to the injunction if it’s later found to be unjustified.
*. Disclosure of Material Facts:
- Provide a full and frank disclosure of all relevant facts, including any that may not favor Perrin's application.
*. Prompt Action:
- Undertake to act promptly and diligently in pursuing the main case to ensure the temporary relief is justified.
Impact on Perrin:
- Financial Risk:
- Perrin may be required to pay compensation to SF if the court later decides the injunction was unwarranted.

- Legal Responsibility:
- Failing to fully disclose all relevant information can lead to the injunction being set aside and potential penalties.

- Expedited Proceedings:
- Perrin must be prepared for a quicker timeline in the main proceedings, which may require additional resources and effort.
Would you like a sample structure for the affidavit or more details on any specific undertaking?
elaborate on sample structure for the affidavit or more details on any specific undertaking
Hey Leo, here's a detailed structure for an affidavit in support of an interlocutory application:
Sample Affidavit Structure:
*. Title:
- "Affidavit of [Perrin’s Full Name] in Support of Interlocutory Application"
*. Introduction:
- Your name, address, occupation, and relationship to the case.
- Purpose of the affidavit: "This affidavit is made in support of an interlocutory application for an injunction against [Sombong Farm Sdn Bhd]."
*. Background:
- Brief history of the dispute with SF.
- Outline previous attempts to resolve the issue amicably.
*. Current Situation:
- Describe the increased water outflow and its impact on Perrin's property.
- Detail the damage to the fence and potential risks to the house foundation.
*. Evidence:
- Attach and refer to relevant documents:
- Photos and videos showing the damage.
- Communication records with SF.
- Reports from structural engineers or other experts.
*. Urgency:
- Emphasize the immediate and irreparable harm that will occur if the court does not grant the injunction7. Prayers:
- Interlocutory Injunction: Request a temporary court order requiring SF to cease farming activities causing water outflow.
- Preventive Measures: Ask the court to order SF to implement immediate drainage solutions to prevent further damage.
- Costs: Request that SF bears the costs of the interlocutory application and any additional expenses incurred.
*. Undertakings:
- Undertaking as to Damages: "I undertake to compensate the defendant for any loss it may suffer due to this injunction if it is later found to be unjustified."
- Disclosure of Material Facts: "I confirm that I have disclosed all relevant facts, including those that may not be in my favor."
- Prompt Action: "I undertake to act promptly and diligently in pursuing the main case."
*. Conclusion:
- Summarize the need for the court's urgent intervention.
- Reiterate the specific prayers you are seeking from the court.
*. Signature and Verification:
- Perrin’s signature.
- Date.
- Verification statement: "I make this affidavit in good faith, believing the contents to be true."
Example Affidavit Excerpt:
Discuss the key elements and averments to be included in the interlocutory application with supporting case law
Hey Leo, let's dive into the key elements and averments to be included in an interlocutory application for Perrin's case, with supporting case law:
Key Elements:
*. Title and Introduction:
- Title: "Interlocutory Application for Injunction"
- Introduction: Briefly mention the parties involved and the purpose of the application.
*. Background:
- Provide a concise history of the dispute, highlighting Perrin's prior attempts to resolve the issue with SF.
*. Current Situation:
- Detail the increased water outflow, damage to the fence, and potential risks to the house foundation.
- Mention any recent developments that exacerbate the problem.
*. Evidence:
- Attach and refer to supporting documents:
- Photos and Videos: Clear images and videos showing the damage.
- Communication Records: Emails, letters, or messages exchanged with SF.
- Expert Opinions: Reports from structural engineers or other professionals.
*. Urgency:
- Emphasize the immediate and irreparable harm that will occur if the court does not grant the injunction.
*. Prayers:
- Interlocutory Injunction: Request a temporary court order requiring SF to cease the harmful activities.
- Preventive Measures: Ask the court to order SF to implement immediate drainage solutions.
- Costs: Request that SF bears the costs of the interlocutory application and any additional expenses incurred.
Supporting Case Law:
*. Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors (*) * MLJ *:
- Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the finding that a valid contract existed and that QAV Technologies breached its terms, resulting in damages to Pentamaster.
- Obiter Dicta: The judge emphasized the importance of clear contractual terms and proper communication channels in business agreements.
*. Relevant Precedents:
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [*] AC *:
- Established the principles for granting interlocutory injunctions, including the need for a serious issue to be tried, the balance of convenience, and the potential for irreparable harm.
Structure of the Affidavit:
*. Title:
- "Affidavit of [Perrin’s Full Name]
Discuss the relevant supporting documents to be exhibited in the affidavit in support.
Hey Leo, here are the relevant supporting documents Perrin should exhibit in his affidavit to strengthen his interlocutory application:
Relevant Supporting Documents:
*. Photos and Videos:
- Clear images and videos showing the damaged fence, soggy soil, and any signs of erosion near the house foundation.
*. Communication Records:
- Emails, letters, or any other form of correspondence between Perrin and SF regarding the issue and previous attempts to resolve it.
*. Land Gazetting Documents:
- Any official documents showing that the land is gazetted for residential purposes.
*. Expert Opinions:
- Reports from structural engineers or other experts assessing the damage to the fence and potential risks to the house foundation.
*. Receipts and Invoices:
- Any receipts or invoices for repairs already undertaken on the fence or immediate protective measures for the foundation.
*. Legal Notices:
- Copies of any formal legal notices sent to SF demanding cessation of the harmful activities and outlining the legal actions Perrin is prepared to take.
*. Municipal and State Authority Communications:
- Any correspondence or documents from the municipal or state authorities regarding the land use and any complaints filed.
Would you like more details on how to organize these documents within the affidavit or assistance with drafting any specific section?
What are the stages of such applications and what would be required in every such stage?
Hey Leo, here's a breakdown of the stages for interlocutory applications and what’s required at each stage:
Stages of Interlocutory Applications:
*. Filing the Application:
- Documents Required:
- Application form.
- Affidavit detailing the background, current situation, urgency, and prayers.
- Supporting documents (photos, videos, expert reports, communication records, etc.).
*. Serving the Application:
- Actions Required:
- Serve copies of the application and supporting documents to SF (the defendant).
- Ensure proper service as per court rules (e.g., personal service, registered post).
*. Hearing:
- Preparation Required:
- Ensure all evidence is organized and accessible.
- Prepare arguments highlighting the urgency and irreparable harm.
- Be ready to address any counterarguments from SF.
*. Court Decision:
- Possible Outcomes:
- Court grants the interlocutory injunction: SF must cease harmful activities immediately.
- Court denies the application: Consider alternative legal actions or appeals.
*. Enforcement:
- Actions Required:
- Monitor compliance with thecourt order.
- Report any non-compliance to the court immediately.
*. Main Case Proceedings:
- Preparation Required:
- Continue gathering evidence and strengthening the main case.
- Follow timelines and court directions diligently.
- Engage in discovery processes, witness preparation, and submission of further affidavits if needed.
Would you like more details on any specific stage or assistance with preparing the required documents?
Discuss the timelines of such application
Hey Leo, here's a general timeline for an interlocutory application in Kuala Lumpur:
*. Preparation (*-* weeks):
- Drafting Documents: Prepare the application form, supporting affidavit, and gather all necessary evidence.
- Legal Notice: Send a formal notice to SF, allowing time for response.
*. Filing the Application (*-2 days):
- Submit Documents: File the application and affidavit with the Magistrates' Court.
*. Service on Defendant (* week):
- Serve SF: Ensure SF receives the application and supporting documents.
*. Initial Hearing (*-* weeks):
- Court Date: Attend the hearing where both parties present their arguments.
- Interim Orders: The court may issue interim orders or adjourn for further evidence.
*. Further Hearings/Final Decision (*-3 months):
- Additional Evidence: Submit any further requested evidence.
- Final Decision: Court rules on the interlocutory application.
*. Enforcement (Immediate):
- Compliance: Ensure SF complies with the court order.
- Report Non-Compliance: Notify the court ifSF does not comply.
Would you like more details on any specific stage, or help with drafting any documents?
provide reference to rules of court * for the timelines of such application
Hey Leo, here's a reference to the Rules of Court * that govern the timelines for interlocutory applications in Malaysia:
- Order * (Injunctions): This order details the procedures for applying for injunctions, including interlocutory injunctions.
- Order * (Applications): Specifies the general procedures for applications, including timelines for filing and serving documents.
- Order * (Case Management): Outlines the timelines for case management, including the scheduling of hearings and submissions of evidence.
Would you like more specific details on any of these orders or assistance with interpreting them?
yes, details please
Sure, Leo! Here are more detailed references to the Rules of Court * related to interlocutory applications:
Order *: Injunctions
- Rule *: Application for an injunction can be made at any stage of the proceedings.
- Rule *: The application must be supported by an affidavit.
- Rule *: The court may grant an interlocutory injunction if it is satisfied that there is a serious issue to be tried, damages would not be an adequate remedy, and the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction.
Order *: Applications
- Rule *: All applications must be made by way of a notice of application supported by an affidavit.
- Rule *: The notice of application must be served on the other party at least 7 days before the hearing date.
- Rule *: The other party has the right to file a counter-affidavit and must do so within the timeline set by the court.
Order *: Case Management
- Rule *: The court schedules case management hearings to ensure efficient progression of the case.
- Rule *: Timelines for submission ofdocuments, witness statements, and other evidence are set during case management conferences.
- Rule *: The court may issue directions regarding the timelines for the filing of interlocutory applications and responses by the parties.
Additional Details for Each Order:
Order * (Injunctions)
- Rule *: In urgent cases, an ex parte application can be made without notice to the other party.
- Rule *: Details the requirements for providing an undertaking as to damages when applying for an interlocutory injunction.
Order * (Applications)
- Rule *: Specifies that the affidavit in support of the application must state the facts relied upon and include any supporting documents.
- Rule *: Allows for the court to grant interim relief pending the determination of the interlocutory application.
Order * (Case Management)
- Rule *: The judge may direct the parties to attend mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution.
- Rule *: The court may fix timelines for the exchange of witness statements and expert reports.
Would you like a sample template for any of these specific applications or further assistance with interpreting a particular rule?
more specific details on any of these orders or assistance with interpreting them
Hey Leo, here are more specific details on the relevant orders under the Rules of Court *:
Order *: Injunctions
- Rule *: Application for an injunction may be made by any party at any time.
- Rule *: The application must be supported by an affidavit.
- Rule *: The court may grant an injunction on such terms as it thinks just.
Order *: Applications
- Rule *: Applications must be made by notice of application.
- Rule *: The notice must state the grounds of the application.
- Rule *: The notice and supporting affidavit must be served on the other party at least 7 days before the hearing date.
Order *: Case Management
- Rule *: The court will fix a case management date within one month after the filing of the application.
- Rule *: Parties must file and exchange all affidavits and documents before the case management date.
- Rule *: The court may give directions on the conduct of the case, including setting timelines for filing further documents and the hearing date.
Would you like assistance interpretingHey Leo, here are more specific details on the relevant orders under the Rules of Court *:
Order *: Injunctions
- Rule *: Application for an injunction can be made at any time.
- Rule *: Must be supported by an affidavit.
- Rule *: Court may grant the injunction on just terms.
Order *: Applications
- Rule *: Applications are made by notice of application.
- Rule *: Notice must state the grounds.
- Rule *: Serve notice and affidavit on the other party at least 7 days before the hearing.
Order *: Case Management
- Rule *: Court fixes a case management date within one month of filing.
- Rule *: Parties must file and exchange affidavits and documents before case management.
- Rule *: Court sets timelines for filing further documents and hearing.
Would you like assistance interpreting any specific rules or more details on these procedures?