Surveillance Footage Dispute Clarification

Summary

Police surveillance footage may suggest a hit-and-run did not occur as described, but it doesnt rule out the possibility of injuries or other evidence. Its important to gather witness statements and additional evidence to support your account of the incident. Consider reviewing the footage if possible and consult with a legal professional for guidance.

Full Conversation

When police say that they have surveillance footage that shows a hit and run did not occur does that mean that the incident did not happen as described that led to theses injuries in a well trafficked and highly surveilled area?
****he police's statement about the surveillance footage may indicate that they believe the incident did not happen as described. However, it doesn't necessarily mean the injuries didn't occur or that there isn't other evidence.
Have you seen the footage or been given the opportunity to review it?
****o clarify the injuries did happen it’s just a matter of how this happened
It sounds like there's a dispute about the circumstances of the injuries. If the police claim the surveillance footage doesn't support a hit-and-run, it's crucial to gather more evidence.
- Have you gathered witness statements or other evidence to support your version of events?