TRY ME!
Trivial Defects In Liability
Summary
Trivial defects in liability cases are generally non-actionable, focusing on minor imperfections like small cracks or slight elevations. Courts evaluate factors such as defect dimensions, location, and context, including lighting and weather, to determine triviality. Relevant cases include Trincere v. County of Suffolk, Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., and Guerrieri v. Summa, which emphasize a holistic assessment of the defects characteristics and surrounding circumstances. These cases highlight that minor defects are often considered too insignificant to impose liability.Full Conversation
cite relevant cases
Sure! Here are some relevant cases that address trivial defects and their non-actionability:
- Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*): This case highlights the factors courts consider in determining whether a defect is trivial, including the defect's size and characteristics.
- Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *): This case reiterates that minor defects, such as small cracks or height variations, are generally deemed trivial and non-actionable.
Do you need information on a specific legal issue or case in New Jersey?
- Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*): This case highlights the factors courts consider in determining whether a defect is trivial, including the defect's size and characteristics.
- Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *): This case reiterates that minor defects, such as small cracks or height variations, are generally deemed trivial and non-actionable.
Do you need information on a specific legal issue or case in New Jersey?
elaborate on those two cases
Sure, here are more details about the two cases:
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*):
- Facts: Plaintiff Hutchinson tripped and fell on a defect in the sidewalk abutting the defendant's property.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and therefore non-actionable.
- Holding: The Court of Appeals held that the defect was trivial, considering factors like the dimensions of the defect and its context (e.g., location, time of day, lighting).
- Legal Principle: Determining triviality involves a holistic assessment of the defect's size, nature, and surrounding circumstances.
Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *):
- Facts: Plaintiff Guerrieri sued after tripping on a minor defect (small crack) in the sidewalk.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and thus not actionable.
- Holding: The Appellate Division held that the defect was trivial, emphasizing the small size and common nature of such imperfections.
- Legal Principle: Small cracks or height variations in walking surfaces are often deemed trivialSure, here are more details about the two cases:
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*):
- Facts: Plaintiff Hutchinson tripped and fell on a defect in the sidewalk abutting the defendant's property.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and therefore non-actionable.
- Holding: The Court of Appeals held that the defect was trivial, considering factors like the dimensions of the defect and its context (e.g., location, time of day, lighting).
- Legal Principle: Determining triviality involves a holistic assessment of the defect's size, nature, and surrounding circumstances.
Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *):
- Facts: Plaintiff Guerrieri sued after tripping on a minor defect (small crack) in the sidewalk.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and thus not actionable.
- Holding: The Appellate Division held that the defect was trivial, emphasizing the small size and common nature of such imperfections.
- Legal Principle: Small cracks or height variations in walking surfaces are often deemed trivial
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*):
- Facts: Plaintiff Hutchinson tripped and fell on a defect in the sidewalk abutting the defendant's property.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and therefore non-actionable.
- Holding: The Court of Appeals held that the defect was trivial, considering factors like the dimensions of the defect and its context (e.g., location, time of day, lighting).
- Legal Principle: Determining triviality involves a holistic assessment of the defect's size, nature, and surrounding circumstances.
Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *):
- Facts: Plaintiff Guerrieri sued after tripping on a minor defect (small crack) in the sidewalk.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and thus not actionable.
- Holding: The Appellate Division held that the defect was trivial, emphasizing the small size and common nature of such imperfections.
- Legal Principle: Small cracks or height variations in walking surfaces are often deemed trivialSure, here are more details about the two cases:
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*):
- Facts: Plaintiff Hutchinson tripped and fell on a defect in the sidewalk abutting the defendant's property.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and therefore non-actionable.
- Holding: The Court of Appeals held that the defect was trivial, considering factors like the dimensions of the defect and its context (e.g., location, time of day, lighting).
- Legal Principle: Determining triviality involves a holistic assessment of the defect's size, nature, and surrounding circumstances.
Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *):
- Facts: Plaintiff Guerrieri sued after tripping on a minor defect (small crack) in the sidewalk.
- Issue: Whether the defect was trivial and thus not actionable.
- Holding: The Appellate Division held that the defect was trivial, emphasizing the small size and common nature of such imperfections.
- Legal Principle: Small cracks or height variations in walking surfaces are often deemed trivial
explain how they relate to Trincere v. County of Suffolk, * N.Y.2d * (*)
- Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp. (*): This case relates to *Trincere v. County of Suffolk* as both involve determining whether a defect was trivial and thus non-actionable. Both cases emphasize evaluating the defect's dimensions, context, and surrounding circumstances.
- Guerrieri v. Summa (*): Similarly, this case aligns with *Trincere* by stressing that small, common defects like cracks are often deemed trivial and non-actionable, reinforcing the principles established in *Trincere*.
Do you need help with a specific legal issue in New Jersey?
- Guerrieri v. Summa (*): Similarly, this case aligns with *Trincere* by stressing that small, common defects like cracks are often deemed trivial and non-actionable, reinforcing the principles established in *Trincere*.
Do you need help with a specific legal issue in New Jersey?
Elaborate on the Legal Principle and include the relevant cases
The legal principle of trivial defects focuses on the idea that minor imperfections in walking surfaces, which are commonly found and generally considered non-hazardous, do not create liability. Here's an elaboration:
Legal Principle: Trivial Defects
- Non-Actionable Negligence: Minor imperfections, such as small cracks or slight elevations, are deemed too insignificant to impose liability.
- Evaluation Factors: Courts consider the defect's dimensions, location, context (e.g., lighting, weather), and the plaintiff's actions.
- Holistic Assessment: A comprehensive evaluation of all circumstances surrounding the defect is essential to determine triviality.
- Non-Actionable Negligence: Minor imperfections, such as small cracks or slight elevations, are deemed too insignificant to impose liability.
- Evaluation Factors: Courts consider the defect's dimensions, location, context (e.g., lighting, weather), and the plaintiff's actions.
- Holistic Assessment: A comprehensive evaluation of all circumstances surrounding the defect is essential to determine triviality.
Relevant Cases:
*. Trincere v. County of Suffolk, * N.Y.2d * (*)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a small defect in a parking lot.
- Holding: The defect was too minor to be actionable.
- Principle: Trivial defects do not constitute actionable negligence.
*. Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a sidewalk defect.
- Holding: Thedefect was trivial, taking into account its size, location, and surrounding circumstances.
- Principle: Triviality is determined through a holistic assessment of the defect’s characteristics and context.
*. Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a small sidewalk crack.
- Holding: The defect was deemed trivial.
- Principle: Minor defects, like small cracks, are often considered too insignificant to be actionable.
Would you like assistance with a specific legal issue in New Jersey?
*. Trincere v. County of Suffolk, * N.Y.2d * (*)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a small defect in a parking lot.
- Holding: The defect was too minor to be actionable.
- Principle: Trivial defects do not constitute actionable negligence.
*. Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp., * N.Y.3d * (*)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a sidewalk defect.
- Holding: Thedefect was trivial, taking into account its size, location, and surrounding circumstances.
- Principle: Triviality is determined through a holistic assessment of the defect’s characteristics and context.
*. Guerrieri v. Summa, * A.D.2d * (N.Y. App. Div. *)
- Facts: Plaintiff tripped on a small sidewalk crack.
- Holding: The defect was deemed trivial.
- Principle: Minor defects, like small cracks, are often considered too insignificant to be actionable.
Would you like assistance with a specific legal issue in New Jersey?
Start a new chat