Summary
In a negligence case under pure comparative negligence, the plaintiffs damages are reduced by their fault percentage. If the plaintiff is 30% at fault, they can recover 70% of the total damages. In this scenario, with damages valued at $10,000 and the defendant 70% at fault, the plaintiff should receive $7,000.Full Conversation
answer the betty question
answer
At the trial of a negligence action, a jury found that the plaintiff's damage was valued at $*,*. The jury also found that the damage was caused *% by the fault of the defendant and *% by the fault of the plaintiff. A statute in the jurisdiction imposes a system of pure comparative negligence fault.
Based on the jury's findings, the court should enter judgment for
Group of answer choices
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Defendant
Based on the system of pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages would be reduced by their percentage of fault. Since the plaintiff was *% at fault, they would be entitled to recover *% of the damages.
- Therefore, the court should enter judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $*,*.
Is there anything else you need help with?
answer
answer
i did
At the trial of a negligence action, a jury found that the plaintiff's damage was valued at $*,*. The jury also found that the damage was caused *% by the fault of the defendant and *% by the fault of the plaintiff. A statute in the jurisdiction imposes a system of pure comparative negligence fault.
Based on the jury's findings, the court should enter judgment for
Group of answer choices
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*
Defendant
Based on the system of pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff should recover the amount of damages proportionate to the defendant's fault. Since the defendant is *% at fault:
- Plaintiff's total damages = $*,*
- Plaintiff's recovery = *% of $*,* = $*,*
The court should enter judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $*,*.
Do you have any other questions regarding this case?
answer the pace question
i did
answer the pace question
i did
remeber this and answer
answer now
answer
answer